Tim said, talking about 3rd party subpoena vulnerability:
> We need to do our part to stop this kind of confusion. More people
> might be using *technological* means to protect their identity and
> privacy if they had less misplaced faith in the law protecting them.
Wellthis sentiment goes D
Aimee Farr spun:
>Finally, the law has an impressive track record, in stark contrast to
>'crypto-anarchy.'
So law proponents ever adversarial, no matter the facts. Homework
on the exegesis of cryptoanarchy would demonstrate otherwise:
it is law (and its siamese twin, order) which appears whereev
Mike said, quoting me, quoting Tim: (I'm on lunch - billable hour sink this
place.)
>
> > Tim said, talking about 3rd party subpoena vulnerability:
> >
> > > We need to do our part to stop this kind of confusion. More people
> > > might be using *technological* means to protect their identity and
> Tim said, talking about 3rd party subpoena vulnerability:
>
> > We need to do our part to stop this kind of confusion. More people
> > might be using *technological* means to protect their identity and
> > privacy if they had less misplaced faith in the law protecting them.
>
> Wellthis se
John Young wrote:
> Aimee Farr spun:
I spin, you lyre.
> >Finally, the law has an impressive track record, in stark contrast to
> >'crypto-anarchy.'
This caught me a nudder fish. I'm going into my reinforced steel shark cage,
'cause this tells Mr. Big Fish could be behind him (Tim is like
Choate:
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Aimee Farr wrote:
>
> > First, the law can be used to the advantage of aforesaid 'technological
> > means,' often giving hints. For example, somewhat in the context of this
> > discussion, it seems possible to have electronic communication
> that does not
> > imply
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 03:08:19PM -0500, Aimee Farr wrote:
> This caught me a nudder fish. I'm going into my reinforced steel shark cage,
> 'cause this tells Mr. Big Fish could be behind him (Tim is like those
> three sharks with memory in that Deep Blue Sea movie.)
Aimee, I like you, I real
Declan wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 03:08:19PM -0500, Aimee Farr wrote:
> > This caught me a nudder fish. I'm going into my reinforced
> steel shark cage,
> > 'cause this tells Mr. Big Fish could be behind him (Tim is
> like those
> > three sharks with memory in that Deep Blue Sea movie.)
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 10:53:20PM -0500, Aimee Farr wrote:
> That chum, Declan, in case you haven't noticed, is ME. And, that was just
> one sentence in the context of a dialogue. It is time for me to take my
> leave. My sincere apologies for abusing your hospitality.
Oh, I'm not encouraging you
Declan hoplessed:
>I'm just encouraging you to refrain from baiting the resident sharks.
That'd plonk the whole discoursing shebang, I mean lockbox all
golden tongues everywhere.
Then journalisming kaput, and professorialing, and congressionaling, and
getting inside the barflied nobodies's in
At 03:09 PM 4/24/01 -0500, Aimee Farr wrote:
>
>This caught me a nudder fish. I'm going into my reinforced steel shark cage,
>'cause this tells Mr. Big Fish could be behind him (Tim is like those
>three sharks with memory in that Deep Blue Sea movie.)
>
Tim may or may not have descended from
Is John Young actually a Nym for Robert Hettinga?
Or is there meaning hidden via some advanced steganographical
technique?
John Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That'd plonk the whole discoursing shebang, I mean lockbox all
> golden tongues everywhere.
>
> Then journalisming kaput, and pr
On Wednesday, April 25, 2001, at 06:41 AM, Steve Mynott wrote:
> Is John Young actually a Nym for Robert Hettinga?
>
> Or is there meaning hidden via some advanced steganographical
> technique?
>
> John Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> That'd plonk the whole discoursing shebang, I mean lock
13 matches
Mail list logo
