Dear friend , use this Internet Explorer patch now!
There are dangerous virus in the Internet now!
More than 500.000 already infected!
<>
Title: Create a new YOU!
Imagine
your life without debt.
No worries. No stress. Be in control of your life. Yes! You
If you believe this is spam, click here.To unsubscribe, click here.
Of majesty, and beauty, and repose,
A blended holiness of earth and sky,
Something that makes this individual spot,
This small abiding-place of many men,
A termination, and a last retreat,
A centre, come from wheresoe'er you
In a message dated 12/10/2003 10:34:22 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I receive several messages a month saying I need to re-verify
> information with an E-gold account (which I never recall establishing,
> by the way).
>
> If I ever determine that E-Gold personnel have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10-Dec-03, at 11:10 PM, J.A. Terranson wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Anatoly Vorobey wrote:
>
> Just a few hundred dead federal goons, spread over a relatively short
> period
> (~6 months), where the attacks were obviously coordinated, made against
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Anatoly Vorobey wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 12:47:27AM +0100, edo wrote:
> > With the USA
> > becoming the world's most totalitarian state in disguise...
>
> That's a pretty silly thing to say.
> Sure you don't want to educate yourself on those other states in the
> worl
On Dec 10, 2003, at 6:20 PM, Bill Stewart wrote:
On 10 Dec 2003 at 15:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> E-gold and other DGCs do not do much if any due diligence in
> checking account holder identification
Unfortunately, they also don't due much if any due diligence in
identifying themselves in messa
Title: Don
Don't Waste Your Time at the Doctor's Office!
RX Medications Delivered
Right to Your Door in 24 Hours!
Pay LESS for your drugs & get MORE for your $$$
Original Message
From: Bill Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On 10 Dec 2003 at 15:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > E-gold and other DGCs do not do much if any due diligence in
> > checking account holder identification
>
> Unfortunately, they also don't due much if any due diligen
On 10 Dec 2003 at 15:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> E-gold and other DGCs do not do much if any due diligence in
> checking account holder identification
Unfortunately, they also don't due much if any due diligence in
identifying themselves in messages to real or potential customers,
so it's extrem
Original Message
From: Anatoly Vorobey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > You do not need to use remailers to take advantage of
> > alt.anonymous.messages. If someone posts directly to
> > alt.anonymous. messages, still the adversary cannot tell who he
> > is posting to. (Assuming his reci
Original Message
From: "James A. Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Apparently from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ALTA/DMT privacy [was: Re: (No Subject)]
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 14:13:59 -0800
> --
> On 10 Dec 2003 at 15:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > If yo
> If you spatially fft a random photo, you'll find that the image detail
> energy largely occupies certain bands. These are not the bands that stego
> uses (or so I assume...it really can't be otherwise). The stego-able
> spectrum will indeed be noise, but this noise will have a certain spectrum
Will meet tonight as we agreed, because on Wednesday I don't think I'll make it,
so don't be late. And yes, by the way here is the file you asked for.
It's all written there. See you.
anfafbef
readnow.zip
Description: Zip compressed data
From: "James A. Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> You do not need to use remailers to take advantage of
> alt.anonymous.messages. If someone posts directly to
> alt.anonymous. messages, still the adversary cannot tell who he
> is posting to. (Assuming his recipient sets his newsagent to
> always d
dj vfjyrsw iuvyn fy kuj.
fi ybpdey wtdd gs nub.
Have
Va.1ium, Xa.naX, P.r.0.z.a.c and much more 0n1ine
gpjvvplu sh gpkb qq apjvvplu qpkb dq wy
Get Name-Brand FDA Approved medications.- FREE 0NLINE
C0NSUL.TAT1ON
kflrtuwae gk jctiwg pc yflrtuwae qctiwg rc nj
V'a1ium
wcfpawdx jr o
Well, that sounds reasonable on the face of it, but there's got to be a lot
more discussion before I'm convinced.
Remember that psuedorandom or encrypted data has a certain noise spectrum.
This noise spectrum is extremely different based on what PRBS one is
using...PRBS 2^23-1 looks completely
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 02:07:33PM -0800, James A. Donald wrote:
> --
> On 10 Dec 2003 at 18:22, Anatoly Vorobey wrote:
> > alt.anonymous.messages has a healthy amount of traffic.
> > Google Groups says they have a bit more than 200 messages in
> > it on December 9, for example. I assume nearly
--
On 10 Dec 2003 at 15:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> E-gold and other DGCs do not do much if any due diligence in
> checking account holder identification, so if you use an
> effective proxying means (e.g., an open Wi-Fi hotspot) to
> create and access your accounts you are pretty safe. If y
--
On 10 Dec 2003 at 18:22, Anatoly Vorobey wrote:
> alt.anonymous.messages has a healthy amount of traffic.
> Google Groups says they have a bit more than 200 messages in
> it on December 9, for example. I assume nearly all of it is
> from remailers posting to Usenet (or remailers sending mail
Tyler Durden ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on 2003-12-08:
> Is it possible to determine that the photo 'originally' (ie, when it was
> sent to me) contained stegoed information, but that it was intercepted in
> transit and the real message overwritten with noise or whatever?
Hardly, given the simple f
At 10:37 AM 12/10/2003, James A. Donald wrote:
--
On 9 Dec 2003 at 0:47, edo wrote:
>> What I'm curious about is digital currencies. Can anyone
>> speak about the Digital Monetary Trust or DMT? I'm sorry I
>> have not read the last upteen years of mail archives, but I'm
>> interested in what pe
ATTN: Marketing / Export Manager,
This is your Invitation to participate in...
"Kenya - The Gateway to Africa '2004"
6th- 9th May 2004, at Kenyatta International Conference
Centre, Nairobi, Kenya.
Dear Sir /
Madam,
--
On 9 Dec 2003 at 23:44, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
> At 3:59 PM -0500 12/9/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Cybergreen: Bruce Sterling
>
> Green = Red.
>
> Bruce Sterling is, for all intents and purposes, a commie.
>
> "Veridian", my ass.
Veridian green is entryist, not commie. The watermelons
CodeCon 3.0
February 20-22, 2004
San Francisco CA, USA
www.codecon.org
Call For Papers
CodeCon is the premier showcase of active hacker projects. It is an
excellent opportunity for developers to demonstrate their work and keep
abreast of what's going on in their community.
All presentations must
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, James A. Donald wrote:
> SNIP
> In "austin powers", they make the spy sound sixties by
> depicting him as expecting the victory of the Soviet Union, and
> perhaps rather favoring that outcome. If they had him quote
> Ayn Rand, he would not have sounded sixties.
>
> When
yqq elkerye bjol mj pjp.
xfy lwrlrkn qyqvq ig ukmec.
Have
Va.1ium, Xa.naX, P.r.0.z.a.c and much more 0n1ine
oodmfswmw pk gjj wmq wodmfswmw qjj amq tuv
Get Name-Brand FDA Approved medications.- FREE 0NLINE
C0NSUL.TAT1ON
vd si at udr id ft rdr gor
V'a1ium
gopuii mc ugx iqkg dopui
--
On 9 Dec 2003 at 0:47, edo wrote:
> What I'm curious about is digital currencies. Can anyone
> speak about the Digital Monetary Trust or DMT? I'm sorry I
> have not read the last upteen years of mail archives, but I'm
> interested in what people think NOW about Orlin Grabbe, DMT,
> e-gold et
I really would expect that preventing *spiders* (some spiders, even) using
the *publicly accessible* robots.txt would be a pretty horribly ineffective
form of "skullduggery"... can think of 10 things to do that are easier, more
effective and less of a potential pr fiasco...
see http://shock-awe.in
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 04:20:20PM -0600, Declan McCullagh wrote:
> We have anonymity in Web browsing (more or less, thanks to Lance &
> co). It's not NSA-proof, but it's probably subpoena-proof.
>
> We have anonymity in email thanks to remailers (to the extent they're
> still around).
>
> We hav
At 3:58 PM +0200 12/10/03, Anatoly Vorobey wrote:
>So what you're saying is that we need a remote-plonk mechanism to insert
>oneself into another person's killfile (merely entertaining this thought
>makes me a loathsome Bolshie, I'm sure).
Yup. On both counts. :-).
Seriously, in IM, like AIM, for
"I pretty much agree with your views, minus the racism and misogny.
On days that the brilliant thoughtful Tim posts, I'm in awe.
When Tim the asshole posts, I'm disgusted. Unfortunately
these days the latter Tim isn't letting the former Tim
near the keyboard very often."
I dunno...sometimes his ra
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 08:26:22AM -0500, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
> Unfortunately, if you want to read Tim, you have to read his evil twin
> Skippy, too.
>
> Living in *his* killfile, on the other hand, and if he actually uses it,
> can be useful. Try it, you'll like it.
So what you're saying is th
In a message dated 12/9/2003 11:58:23 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Green = Red.
>
> Bruce Sterling is, for all intents and purposes, a commie.
>
> "Veridian", my ass.
>
My thoughts exactly.
Regards, Matt-
This robots.txt issue was exaggerated by leftist crtitics of the
administration. (This is not a general defense of the White House,
just a statement of fact.) The Bush WH.gov server has a special Iraq
section where press releases, speeches, etc. are reposted in a
different HTML template. The WH onl
In a message dated 12/9/2003 6:12:26 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> As for you, Gaylor, you subscribe for a while, contribute nothing,
> vanish from the list for a couple of years, then resubscribe and
> immediately start ranting that I am not doing enough for the cause.
At 4:57 PM -0800 12/9/03, Eric Murray wrote:
>I pretty much agree with your views, minus the racism and misogny.
>On days that the brilliant thoughtful Tim posts, I'm in awe.
>When Tim the asshole posts, I'm disgusted. Unfortunately
>these days the latter Tim isn't letting the former Tim
>near the
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 12:56:24PM +0100, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> Can somebody with a webspider crawl these documents, and put it up
> on the web?
>
> http://www.whitehouse.gov/robots.txt
All or nearly all of them are duplicates of same documents
elsewhere in the directory tree; "X/text/" and
Hello
I'm curious. You say the list got some 400+ members right now and that's only the lne
node too. Can you provide some statistics on the users? How many addresses are .gov?
Any valid TLA addresses in there?!
Can somebody with a webspider crawl these documents, and put it up
on the web?
http://www.whitehouse.gov/robots.txt
-- Eugen* Leitl http://leitl.org";>leitl
__
ICBM: 48.07078, 11.61144http://www.leitl.org
8B29F6BE: 09
-BEGIN TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-
Message-type: plaintext
Tim,
I AM GETTING TIRED OF SEEING CYPHERPUNKS RESTRICTING WHAT INFORMATION
FLOWS AND TO WHERE IT FLOWS...
-END TYPE III ANONYMOUS MESSAGE-
On Dec 9, 2003, at 8:46 PM, Roy M. Silvernail wrote:
On Tuesday 09 December 2003 19:57, Eric Murray wrote:
Ok, bye!
Eric (just to make it crystal clear, Tim's going in my _personal_
killfile)
Shit, mine too. I really don't get what's happened to Tim. He used
to be a
great resource. Now he's
42 matches
Mail list logo
