Re: Vengeance Libertarianism

2004-01-01 Thread Anatoly Vorobey
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 01:14:01PM -0600, Harmon Seaver wrote: > On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 01:59:50PM -0500, Sunder wrote: > > If those are your beliefs, then by all means, set the first example, and > > go kill yourself. Better yet, sacrifice yourself to your goddess... By > > doing so, you'll als

Re: Release Saddam now

2003-12-19 Thread Anatoly Vorobey
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 01:17:28PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Saddam is being wrongly held by illegal invaders and occupiers. He > should be immediately released or turned over to legitimate > authorities, such as the international courts. Advocate for the > release of Saddam Hussein, and

Re: U.S. in violation of Geneva convention?

2003-12-19 Thread Anatoly Vorobey
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 10:11:32AM -0500, Sunder wrote: > That all depends on your definition of sovereign. After all, "we" put, or > at least helped, that monster into power. Not really, no. > So, while he was our puppet, He was never out puppet. > he was the good guy, He was never the good

Re: U.S. in violation of Geneva convention?

2003-12-17 Thread Anatoly Vorobey
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 04:46:51PM -0500, Michael Kalus wrote: > Nice, but the problem still remains: At this point it doesn't matter > what he has done (or we say he has done). Of course it matters. > This is not a punishment. > "Innocent until proofen guilty" anyone? This is the basis for th

Re: U.S. in violation of Geneva convention?

2003-12-17 Thread Anatoly Vorobey
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 12:12:55PM -0600, Harmon Seaver wrote: > > This isn't a ski mask burglary. We KNOW Saddam ruled Iraq. > > We KNOW what crimes were committed. Simple syllogism. > > No we don't. We only know what the propaganda mills have told us. Twenty years > ago it was a different st

Re: U.S. in violation of Geneva convention?

2003-12-17 Thread Anatoly Vorobey
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 05:06:55PM -0500, Tyler Durden wrote: > A thread that started out quasi-interesting has descended into > non-Cypherpunk levels of triviality. I thought it was trivial all along. > The original point stands, and is valid. The Islamic world and, in > particular, the Arabic

Re: U.S. in violation of Geneva convention?

2003-12-17 Thread Anatoly Vorobey
You wrote on Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 03:19:43PM -0500: > Jim Dixon wrote: > > > > >I have gazed into the abyss and seen a man having his teeth checked and > >getting a haircut. :-| > > > > > > And how would you have felt to be the one who got your teeth checked and > get a haircut with the whole

Re: (No Subject)

2003-12-11 Thread Anatoly Vorobey
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 10:10:03PM -0600, J.A. Terranson wrote: > > > With the USA > > > becoming the world's most totalitarian state in disguise... > > > > That's a pretty silly thing to say. > > Sure you don't want to educate yourself on those other states in the > > world? > > It's not silly

Re: alt.anonymous.messages

2003-12-10 Thread Anatoly Vorobey
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 02:07:33PM -0800, James A. Donald wrote: > -- > On 10 Dec 2003 at 18:22, Anatoly Vorobey wrote: > > alt.anonymous.messages has a healthy amount of traffic. > > Google Groups says they have a bit more than 200 messages in > > it on December

Re: (No Subject)

2003-12-10 Thread Anatoly Vorobey
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 04:20:20PM -0600, Declan McCullagh wrote: > We have anonymity in Web browsing (more or less, thanks to Lance & > co). It's not NSA-proof, but it's probably subpoena-proof. > > We have anonymity in email thanks to remailers (to the extent they're > still around). > > We hav

Re: Speaking of Reason

2003-12-10 Thread Anatoly Vorobey
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 08:26:22AM -0500, R. A. Hettinga wrote: > Unfortunately, if you want to read Tim, you have to read his evil twin > Skippy, too. > > Living in *his* killfile, on the other hand, and if he actually uses it, > can be useful. Try it, you'll like it. So what you're saying is th

Re: whitehouse.gov/robots.txt

2003-12-10 Thread Anatoly Vorobey
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 12:56:24PM +0100, Eugen Leitl wrote: > Can somebody with a webspider crawl these documents, and put it up > on the web? > > http://www.whitehouse.gov/robots.txt All or nearly all of them are duplicates of same documents elsewhere in the directory tree; "X/text/" and

Re: Anti-globalization

2003-12-09 Thread Anatoly Vorobey
On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 06:41:21PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote: > On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Tyler Durden wrote: > > > However, I don't see the strong support for Soviet or Maoist-style state > > control these days...these are vaguely romantic notions once in a while, but > > they don't have any deep ide

Re: Got.net and its narcing out of its customers

2003-12-09 Thread Anatoly Vorobey
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 01:57:00PM -0500, Duncan Frissell wrote: > > Then one of them claimed he had arranged to have my account yanked, for > > "violation of the DMCA." He claimed he had sent copies of my "criminal" > > admissions to Got.net, to the RIAA, to "law enforcement" (shudder!), > > and s

Re: (No Subject)

2003-12-09 Thread Anatoly Vorobey
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 12:47:27AM +0100, edo wrote: > With the USA > becoming the world's most totalitarian state in disguise... That's a pretty silly thing to say. Sure you don't want to educate yourself on those other states in the world? > As far as I'm concerned, true anonymity in finacial

Re: Got.net and its narcing out of its customers

2003-12-09 Thread Anatoly Vorobey
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 04:37:44AM +, Michael Shields wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "James A. Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Searching GG on "don frederickson got tim" is maybe more reliable than > >> pasting this URL. > > > > For long urls, compress with tinuyurl.com > >