>So "Cypherpunks" is a political movement, then? You are cohesive, and, as
>frequently pointed out, have a written doctrine. (i.e., "read the archives,
>twit" seems to echo in my mind). You have meatspace meetings, and members
>which identify with you as a "movement."
Of course, and hereby I off
It was a joke, James. "CAACA?" C'mon
~Aimee
> When the US introduced legislation against the communist
> movement, that movement was for the most part centrally
> directed from Moscow, and had as its objective the
> destruction of the USA and its conquest and occupation by the
> Soviet army
--
On 20 Jan 2002, at 1:53, Aimee Farr wrote:
> Somebody wrote:
>
> > I, in particular (and many other Cpunk Movement members)
> > do not consider People That Control Armed Men to be "us"
> > and will not identify
> their snitching
> > capabilities with my well-being.
>
> So "Cypherpunks" is
Heh, that's really funny, considering that the United States is already
in a state of anarcy. He who has the most lawyers, buddy-connections and
bucks, can do anything and is indeed already in power. Last elections
witnessed the take-over of the Unites States by military crypto-anarchists.
Georg
Somebody wrote:
> I, in particular (and many other Cpunk Movement members) do not
> consider People That Control Armed Men to be "us" and will not identify
their snitching
> capabilities with my well-being.
So "Cypherpunks" is a political movement, then? You are cohesive, and, as
frequently poin
