past/present/future.
I'm starting to think that Mr Donald's contributions to Cypherpunks may be
part of his job description.
-TD
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: I am anti war. You lot support Saddam
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 01:40:51 -0500
At 08:14 PM 12/23
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> It really is that they hate us for our (relative) freedom.
Believe it or not, but most people do not care about what way you live.
The only way they know about your "freedom" by watching american TV. So
blame it on yourself.
> I
> can see that
--
James A. Donald
> > That was the "raghead fanatic way of life should perish."
> > Not "raghead fanatics should perish"
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Oh some distinction...
The difference between killing people and setting them free
doubtless seems trivial to the fans of slavery and terror.
>. and
At 12:20 AM 12/24/2003 -0800, "James A. Donald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--
Jamie Lawrence
> > > As it stands, you seem only capable of attempting to
> > > impute motives to others that you imagine they might
> > > hold, based on wildy improbable chains of cause and
> > > effect in philosoph
--
Jamie Lawrence
> > > As it stands, you seem only capable of attempting to
> > > impute motives to others that you imagine they might
> > > hold, based on wildy improbable chains of cause and
> > > effect in philosophical arguments and obscure cause and
> > > effect based on international rel
--
J.A. Terranson
> We had [9/11] coming. Years ago. One cause above *all*
> others (although there are dozens):
>
> Israel.
>
> We have, through our total support of the israeli mass murder
> state, earned the retribution of civilized peoples.
>
> We lost 3k on 9/11. So what. How many
At 08:14 PM 12/23/2003 -0800, CIA-apologist "James A. Donald"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--
James A. Donald
> > > > You have just told us that poor little Saddam is a
> > > > victim.
Jamie Lawrence:
> > > Incorrect. I said no such thing, and you're being a twit
> > > by attempting to credit m
At 04:40 PM 12/23/2003 -0800, Tim May wrote:
Chomsky lies. and you are obviously a sock puppet for the Trilateralist
Bilderbergers.
It's amazing how many people are building burgers these days
instead of doing technical work, now that sockpuppets.com crashed.
Usually they're round, and Wendy's mak
--
James A. Donald
> > > > You have just told us that poor little Saddam is a
> > > > victim.
Jamie Lawrence:
> > > Incorrect. I said no such thing, and you're being a twit
> > > by attempting to credit me with such statements.
James A. Donald
> > You were telling us that the USG's terrible m
On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, James A. Donald wrote:
> James A. Donald;
> > > You have just told us that poor little Saddam is a victim.
>
> Jamie Lawrence wrote:
> > Incorrect. I said no such thing, and you're being a twit by
> > attempting to credit me with such statements.
>
> You were telling us tha
--
James A. Donald
> > > > Anyone who wants to argue that the guys in the two
> > > > towers had it coming, and poor Saddam is a victim, puts
> > > > himself in the corner with the people who are stupid,
> > > > evil, and losers.
Jamie Lawrence:
> > > Anyone who babbles such inane false re
On Dec 23, 2003, at 3:07 PM, Jamie Lawrence wrote:
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, James A. Donald wrote:
James A. Donald;
You have just told us that poor little Saddam is a victim.
Incorrect. I said no such thing, and you're being a twit by attempting
to credit me with such statements. Your repeated attempt
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, James A. Donald wrote:
> --
> James A. Donald
> > > > > Anyone who wants to argue that the guys in the two
> > > > > towers had it coming, and poor Saddam is a victim, puts
> > > > > himself in the corner with the people who are stupid,
> > > > > evil, and losers.
>
>
--
James A. Donald
> > > > Anyone who wants to argue that the guys in the two
> > > > towers had it coming, and poor Saddam is a victim, puts
> > > > himself in the corner with the people who are stupid,
> > > > evil, and losers.
Jamie Lawrence:
> > > Anyone who babbles such inane false re
that drives most of this sort of feeling,
> suddenly required knocking over a crippled tyrant.
The title of this thread is 'I am anti war. You lot support
Saddam" I don't defend the war on Iraq. Why are you
supporting Saddam?
James A. Donald
> > Anyone who wants to argue t
15 matches
Mail list logo
