On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You are not sufficiently suspicious and cynical.
>
> Observe that the three people who are spamming and trolling
> this list have similar political views, views whose
> implementation requires a large and powerful state.
You need to realie that I a
>>Until mattd made his actual purposes known (i.e., that this > is seen by
him as a free archive service), <<
Interesting who's objecting,the fools,liars and knaves are coming out of
the rotten woodwork.
>>I had > [personally] lumped him in with Jei - vocal, but useless. You
are not suffici
--
On 7 Feb 2002, at 1:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jim, I believe Peter's point, and mine as well, is that
> posters such as Jei and mattd differ by their intent. Jei
> is obviously a participant, and an active one. Whether or
> not anyone cares to listen, he's "legit" in that he is
> act
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Eugene Leitl wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Jim Choate wrote:
>
> > > 1) he's nuts. he won't listen to you.
> >
> > > 2) somebody please post that procmail recipe which would clog up his
> > >mailbox
> >
> > You're as nuts as he is.
>
> We have apparently a list policy wh
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Trei, Peter quoted the mad ravings of mattd:
>
> > Consider this recent post excerpt:
> >
> > > I store articles that interest me here.Filter me
> > > out and I'm happy as a pig in shit.
> >
>
> I had to look up the relevant
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Jim, I believe Peter's point, and mine as well, is that posters such as Jei
> and mattd differ by their intent.
Taking up mind reading? You don't know a damn thing about their 'intent'
only how it makes you feal.
mattd posts drivel, delete it. Je
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Trei, Peter wrote:
> This is abuse of the whole notion of a mailing
> list as a place of discourse. It is a sociopathic
> disregard for everyone who uses the list as a
> place for discussion and persuasion. It is more
> contemptable than even spam.
1) he's nuts. he won't list
>>I had to look up the relevant post to believe it wasn't somehow being
used out of context.
It is being used out of context.It meant I was happy to be left alone.I'm
also happy to engage with anyone who wants to engage with me.I would post a
lot less here if I wasn't mentioned.
>>Mattd: H
Jim, I believe Peter's point, and mine as well, is that posters such as Jei
and mattd differ by their intent. Jei is obviously a participant, and an
active one. Whether or not anyone cares to listen, he's "legit" in that he
is actively engaging those who care to receive him. For those who do n
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Trei, Peter quoted the mad ravings of mattd:
> Consider this recent post excerpt:
>
> > I store articles that interest me here.Filter me
> > out and I'm happy as a pig in shit.
>
I had to look up the relevant post to believe it wasn't somehow being used
out of context.
M
>>Read my post again. My problem was not with folks who want to talk or
flame on or off topic.
Not replying to posts from me RE you,Peter,leaves you open here.Are you
scared to respond,Lazy?Hipyocritical?
>>It is with a person who disregards the entire notion of using the list
for discours
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Trei, Peter wrote:
> Read my post again. My problem was not with
> folks who want to talk or flame on or off topic.
Your problem is your a whinner when you don't get your way or people with
other views manage to stand toe to toe and point for point with your CACL
drivel.
>
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Trei, Peter wrote:
> Consider this recent post excerpt:
>
> > I store articles that interest me here.Filter me
> > out and I'm happy as a pig in shit.
>
> Clearly, sociopathic behaviour of this type is not
> amenable to appeals to reason.
That isn't sociopathic. And in fa
13 matches
Mail list logo
