At 05:50 PM 6/4/2002 -0700, Declan McCullagh wrote:
>>* Can$1.3 million/year of remaining cash will be eaten up by four fat
>>executive salaries that remain hefty, even given the dismal financial
>>situation. Each of the three Hill family members gets Can$270K a year,
>>with the CEO receiving
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002 16:58:16 -0400, "Adam Shostack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> I find myself storing a pile of vaugely sensitive information on my
> palm. Where do I find the competent analysis of this?
Perhaps this will help..
http://www.atstake.com/research/reports/index.html#pdd_palm_for
I've been using Cryptopad 3 (Memo pad replacement) and like it (uses Eric Young's
Blowfish).
v4 is available (freeware)
http://www.freewarepalm.com/utilities/cryptopad.shtml
http://www.palmblvd.com/software/pc/CryptoPad-2000-10-12-palm-pc.html
jay
On 4 Jun 2002 at 16:58, Adam Shostack wrote:
On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 04:58:16PM -0400, Adam Shostack wrote:
> I find myself storing a pile of vaugely sensitive information on my
> palm. Where do I find the competent analysis of this? Ideally, I'd
> like to be able to protect things that I move into a "sensitive" area
> (passwords), and ma
We're not missing anything, except more users...
http://open-forge.org
On Tue, 28 May 2002, Mister Heex wrote:
> What are the fundamental building blocks that we're missing for a bright 'n'
> shiny crypto-future?
--
from Intel sources, quoted by eweek 3 jun 02:
Itanium 2 does 1,440 secure transactions/sec,
"nearly three times the performance of an 8-CPU
Ultrasparc III server"
FWIW; there was a thread on SSL performance
here some time ago.
Adam Shostack wrote:
> I find myself storing a pile of vaugely sensitive information on my
> palm. Where do I find the competent analysis of this? Ideally, I'd
> like to be able to protect things that I move into a "sensitive" area
> (passwords), and maybe select items in other places that I wa
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Adam Shostack wrote:
>
> I find myself storing a pile of vaugely sensitive information on my
> palm. Where do I find the competent analysis of this? Ideally, I'd
> like to be able to protect things that I move into a "sensitive" area
> (passwords), and maybe select items i
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Trei, Peter wrote:
> Well, I'm convinced - I guess that's why every single album today is
> released on both CD *and* vinyl - can't piss off the tens of millions of
> turntable owners, after all.
That's not correct. There are lots of albums (aimed at DJ's for example)
that
> Jim Choate[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
>
> On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Trei, Peter wrote:
>
> > Well, I'm convinced - I guess that's why every single album today is
> > released on both CD *and* vinyl - can't piss off the tens of millions of
>
> > turntable owners, after all.
>
> That's not cor
In his paper on Lucre ("2nd defence" against marking):
http://anoncvs.aldigital.co.uk/lucre/
Ben Laurie gives this as a (possibly patent-free) blinding technique,
where h is the message, and g is the public generator:
r = blind(h) = h^y * g^b (mod p)
To "sign",
s = sig
At 05:06 PM 6/3/2002 -0400, Trei, Peter wrote:
>Tim, I think you're missing the point here. Valenti and his ilk would like
nothing more than to force you to to rebuy your visual media *again*, but
they don't have to. I'll bet dollars to donuts that you've rebought some of
your VCR tapes as DVDs. W
Jason Holt writes:
> In his paper on Lucre ("2nd defence" against marking):
> http://anoncvs.aldigital.co.uk/lucre/
>
> Ben Laurie gives this as a (possibly patent-free) blinding technique,
> where h is the message, and g is the public generator:
>
> r = blind(h) = h^y * g^b (mod p)
>
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 07:25:37PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Jim Choate wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Trei, Peter wrote:
> >
> > > Well, I'm convinced - I guess that's why every single album today is
> > > released on both CD *and* vinyl - can't piss off the
On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Jim Choate wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Trei, Peter wrote:
>
> > Well, I'm convinced - I guess that's why every single album today is
> > released on both CD *and* vinyl - can't piss off the tens of millions of
> > turntable owners, after all.
>
> That's not correct. Ther
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: CDR: RE: Degrees of Freedom vs. Hollywood Control Freaks
> Ok, somebody correct me if I'm wrong here, but didn't they officially
cease
> production of vinyl pressings several years ago? As in *all* vinyl
> pressings???
They st
Jason Holt writes:
> In his paper on Lucre ("2nd defence" against marking):
> http://anoncvs.aldigital.co.uk/lucre/
>
> Ben Laurie gives this as a (possibly patent-free) blinding technique,
> where h is the message, and g is the public generator:
>
> r = blind(h) = h^y * g^b (mod p)
>
17 matches
Mail list logo
