Rich Salz wrote:
>> *shrug* it doesn't retroactively enforce the safety net - but that's
>> ok, most MS products don't either :)
> The whole point is to enhance common practice, not stay at the lowest
> common denominator.
If someone has *already* issued a certificate - and ignored the CA flag - is
On Dec 14, 2003, at 6:33 PM, Thomas Shaddack wrote:
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003, Tyler Durden wrote:
Spread the word. The adminstration got desparate. In a few weeks
they'll
announce this isn't the real Saddam, but that rounding up all of the
clones
is necessary progress in the fight to get the real Sa
Hi, I've been admiring your and Tim's contributions, and I was wondering if
either of you were planning to subscribe to the (new) news list.
http://lists.cryptnet.net/mailman/listinfo/cpunx-news
Be sure and check the archive before posting. It is still small.
Otherwise, if anyone could recommen
On Sun, 14 Dec 2003, Tyler Durden wrote:
> Spread the word. The adminstration got desparate. In a few weeks they'll
> announce this isn't the real Saddam, but that rounding up all of the clones
> is necessary progress in the fight to get the real Saddam.
If I don't remember incorrectly, they sai
Ahh... but if that were true, why would the US ever admit it? Let's say
they run a DNA test and it's not him... why not just say, "We ran a DNA
test and it's him!!" That would be a bigger boost for Bush for the
coming election.
There's still 13 more in the deck of cards - as well as Bin Lade
On Dec 14, 2003, at 6:07 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I've been admiring your and Tim's contributions, and I was
wondering if
either of you were planning to subscribe to the (new) news list.
http://lists.cryptnet.net/mailman/listinfo/cpunx-news
Be sure and check the archive before posting.
On 14 Dec, Tim May wrote:
> No, we don't need a "cpunx-news" list. This is what Google and the
> ability to see hundreds of various lists and sites is for.
>
> "News" lists tend strongly to be just dumping grounds for crap from
> other lists.
Yea, and I'll admit that I'm a junky, which is why I
On Dec 14, 2003, at 6:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14 Dec, Tim May wrote:
No, we don't need a "cpunx-news" list. This is what Google and the
ability to see hundreds of various lists and sites is for.
"News" lists tend strongly to be just dumping grounds for crap from
other lists.
Yea, and I'
On Sat, 13 Dec 2003, John Kelsey wrote:
> Of course, there's a more fundamental problem with surrendering to the lone
> warriors. Imagine that there's such a wave of pro-life terrorism that we
> finally agree to ban abortion. You're a fanatically committed pro-choice
> activist. What's your nex
Spread the word. The adminstration got desparate. In a few weeks they'll
announce this isn't the real Saddam, but that rounding up all of the clones
is necessary progress in the fight to get the real Saddam.
-TD
_
Get holiday tips
From: Thomas Shaddack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Sat, 13 Dec 2003, John Kelsey wrote:
>
> > Of course, there's a more fundamental problem with surrendering to the lone
> > warriors. Imagine that there's such a wave of pro-life terrorism that we
> > finally agree to ban abortion. You're a fanatical
At 06:49 PM 12/13/2003 +0100, some provocateur claiming to be Anonymous wrote:
A question for the moment might well be how many if any of
the remailers are operated by TLAs?
The TLAs have proposed running various anonymizers for China
and other countries that have oppressive eavesdroppers.
If yo
On Dec 14, 2003, at 12:40 AM, Bill Stewart wrote:
At 06:49 PM 12/13/2003 +0100, some provocateur claiming to be
Anonymous wrote:
A question for the moment might well be how many if any of
the remailers are operated by TLAs?
The TLAs have proposed running various anonymizers for China
and other
I went to a meeting of the Irvine Underground (irvineunderground.org)
which reminded me of late-90s SF CP meatings. Although the overall
tech level was probably lower and social implications weren't a big
topic.
Also, at this meeting, there were far more cameras or videocams than
were present (at
(resend)
At 11:52 AM 12/13/03 -0500, John Kelsey wrote:
>At 09:19 AM 12/12/03 -0800, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
>...
>>You need to think about the "lone warrior" scenario that the Gang
>>worries about. McVeighs and Rudolphs.
>>They were influenced by memes which were not immediately suppressed.
>
Tim May wrote:
I haven't carefully looked at the current source code (if it's
available) for things like "Type II Mixmaster" remailers, things which
offer reply-blocks.
The source is available for mixmaster. However, Type II does not offer
reply blocks.
Certainly for the canonical Cypherpunks
16 matches
Mail list logo
