>Cryptome received a visit today from FBI Special Agents Todd Renner and Christopher
>Kelly from the FBI Counterterrorism Office in New York, 26 Federal Plaza, telephone
>212) 384-1000. Both agents presented official ID and business cards.
Good stuff. Pigs getting concerned about cryptome means th
Not scared, hungry. They're looking for more "collars" they can throw in
jail so they meet their quotas.
--Kaos-Keraunos-Kybernetos---
+ ^ + :25Kliters anthrax, 38K liters botulinum toxin, 500 tons of /|\
\|/ :sarin, mustard and VX gas, mobile bi
SA Renner did most of the talking and carried a
manila folder with a file name on it beginning with
"SP," I think. Couldn't see the remainder. He didn't
open it during the session and it may have been
a prop.
They showed up without warning, no call ahead, got
past our Doberman doorman (we're on
>I tried to get them to sit together but they carefully
>bracketed me.
John, it's imaginable how it feels. It's very inconvenient when men
with guns send their minions - and it wouldn't surprise me if it does,
over time, change Cryptome's attitude. Avoid heroic stupidity. Optimize
for the long run
On Nov 8, 2003, at 11:06 AM, Anonymous wrote:
Cryptome received a visit today from FBI Special Agents Todd Renner
and Christopher
Kelly from the FBI Counterterrorism Office in New York, 26 Federal
Plaza, telephone
212) 384-1000. Both agents presented official ID and business cards.
Good stuff. P
In a message dated 11/10/2003 3:02:47 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
They showed up without warning, no call ahead, got
past our Doberman doorman (we're on the 6th floor)
who usually calls us about visitors but didn't this time,
and hasn't said a peep since the visit.
Why o
Matt wrote:
>Why open the door to them? I have a few friends who as a matter of principle
>do not open their doors to people they do not know. Letting a Fedgoon in is
>akin to inviting a vampire into your house.
I was expecting someone else at about the same time. True, I could
have refused ent
>Confirming the allegation about idiot witnesses, I am
>sure I would not recognize either agent if I saw them
>again. The IDs yes, and the questions, but not the
>bland biometrics.
You do have right to take pictures in your residence, no ?
I am sure that "John Young's real time door webcam" would
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 09:01:00PM -0800, Tim May wrote:
> People should not talk to the Feds. If the Feds come calling, refer
> them to one's lawyer. For those who don't have a lawyer on retainer,
> tell them that you need to consult with a lawyer first. Whether you do
> or you don't is beside
Declan wrote:
>Even if you don't have a lawyer on retainer, and I suspect few folks
>here do, saying you need to consult with one will provide you with
>time to give the local ACLU affiliate a call. Also law school legal
>clinics can be useful sources of free advice in a pinch.
I've consulted a l
At 04:35 AM 11/16/2003 +0100, Anonymous wrote:
>Confirming the allegation about idiot witnesses, I am
>sure I would not recognize either agent if I saw them
>again. The IDs yes, and the questions, but not the
>bland biometrics.
You do have right to take pictures in your residence, no ?
I am sure t
My comment about the SAs having no noticeable body odor
came out the notion that persons on a dangerous mission
emit an easily identifiable smell, a smell not unlike that
emitted by an unwary target when suddently confronted with
danger.
Innocents need not worry about these unintentional fear
ema
At 07:40 AM 11/30/03 -0800, John Young wrote:
>My comment about the SAs having no noticeable body odor
>came out the notion that persons on a dangerous mission
>emit an easily identifiable smell, a smell not unlike that
>emitted by an unwary target when suddently confronted with
>danger.
Agents ha
13 matches
Mail list logo
