On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 12:40:26AM -0500, Declan McCullagh wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 10:48:37PM -0500, Dave Emery wrote:
> > I might hasten to add that as I am sure Declan knows, this
> > addition to the Homeland Defense Act also includes the CSEA provisions
> > that turn hobby listening
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 10:48:37PM -0500, Dave Emery wrote:
> I might hasten to add that as I am sure Declan knows, this
> addition to the Homeland Defense Act also includes the CSEA provisions
> that turn hobby listening to certain easy to receive but off limit
> radio signals from an offens
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 10:20:42PM -0800, Steve Schear wrote:
> At 11:59 PM 11/15/2002 -0500, Dave Emery wrote:
> >And I am on record as advising some of the folks doing gnu-radio
> >that in my personal opinion it was rather unlikely that a user
> >programmable open source software radio wo
ld ladies of their retirement $?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >From: Jim Choate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >CC: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: News: House votes life sentences for hackers (fwd)
&g
At 11:59 PM 11/15/2002 -0500, Dave Emery wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 08:01:08PM -0800, Tim May wrote:
Whilst hardly (understatement of the year) a Washington insider,
I would speculate that perhaps someone in the DOJ has gotten concerned
about recent white hat hacker projects like gru-r
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 08:01:08PM -0800, Tim May wrote:
>
> And software-defined radios, which are now coming from at least two
> sources, will make this even easier. Indeed, "trespassing" into the Big
> Brother-owned frequencies will be even easier.
>
> We may even see SDRs outlawed from the
On Friday, November 15, 2002, at 07:48 PM, Dave Emery wrote:
I might hasten to add that as I am sure Declan knows, this
addition to the Homeland Defense Act also includes the CSEA provisions
that turn hobby listening to certain easy to receive but off limit
radio signals from an offense with a m
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 12:11:35PM -0500, Declan McCullagh wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 10:09:37AM -0500, Tyler Durden wrote:
> > Holy Shit!
> >
> > Does that mean that some 18-year-old script kiddie could get LIFE?
>
> Yes, that's what the law says. Has to be a malicious attack, etc. I linke
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 10:09:37AM -0500, Tyler Durden wrote:
> Holy Shit!
>
> Does that mean that some 18-year-old script kiddie could get LIFE?
Yes, that's what the law says. Has to be a malicious attack, etc. I linked
to the text of the bill -- you may want to read the gory details for yoursel
de!"
Send script kiddies away for life? How about sending the CTOs of publically
traded companies away for life if something as simple as a DoS attack robs
little old ladies of their retirement $?
From: Jim Choate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: <[
10 matches
Mail list logo
