Aurélien, you seem to have put your finger on the issues. Very well observed,
it would be good to think that users feedback was considered.
Sent from Workspace ONE Boxer
On 20 Apr 2019 11:41, Aurélien Pierre wrote:
Hi,
I second that. I tend to avoid every distraction while working and pref
Hi,
I second that. I tend to avoid every distraction while working and
prefer non-real time communication channels, especially when I'm not on
a GMT±1 timezone (most dt's devs are EU-based, so IRC disadvantages
Americas, Asia, Australia, NZ, etc.). Also, some skilled devs are not
fluent enough in
I think we mix up 2 (or 3) different things in this topic. Let's say
a contributor wants to implement some feature:
First some discussion should probably happen, for example other
developers can help with pointers on how said feature can and should be
integrated into DT core. I don't see any need
We are facing the same issue, where to discuss things, with the lua-scripts
repository. We've thought about using github issues and discuss.pixls.us,
but we still haven't come up with a solution. I think I'm just going to
try the github issues and see how it goes.
Bill
On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 1
Le mercredi 17 avril 2019 à 14:12 -0300, Moritz Moeller a écrit :
> But I agree with parent that it is not the right tool to discuss big
> changes.
> IRC has no history. IRC has no message threads.
> That's why I mentioned NNTP.
My first best is GitHub Issues.
You create an enhancement request t
On 17.4.19 09:16, johannes hanika wrote:
i second the 'getting old' bit. and i really like IRC.
Maybe you misunderstood my message's intend?
Yes, I too prefer IRC over any 'modern' chat client.
But I agree with parent that it is not the right tool to discuss big
changes.
IRC has no histor
Le mercredi 17 avril 2019 à 08:47 -0400, Mark Feit a écrit :
> PRs shouldn't exist until there's code to be pulled. Sometimes there's
> discussion about a project before anyone writes a single line.
I just don't agree. Many nice dt features won't have been created
otherwise. Many people like dt,
On 4/16/19 1:51 PM, rawfiner wrote:
Using github by commenting directly on PRs
I'm in favor of this with some modifications with the mailing list as a
second choice. IRC is too ephemeral without logging and conversations
can go on for days and end up intermixed with other topics, making it
On 4/16/19 11:46 PM, Moritz Moeller wrote:
> There is this thing called 'a news server' which has all of below
> but has infinite history (for free) and you can actually see who
> replied to whom before even opening/deciding to read a message.
>
> That feature alone makes a news server with a dece
i second the 'getting old' bit. and i really like IRC. i could never
get the hang of these fancy websites that force you to use a mouse.
for slack at least there used to be an IRC bridge. it seems mattermost
may be an alternative that does support IRC, for those of us who
insist on animated gifs fo
Hi,
Am 16.04.19 um 19:51 schrieb rawfiner:
Currently, the place where big changes should be discussed is IRC
(according to houz, as I have not seen this information anywhere, which
is problematic as new contributors may make big changes, so they have at
least to be able to know where is the pl
There is this thing called 'a news server' which has all of below but
has infinite history (for free) and you can actually see who replied to
whom before even opening/deciding to read a message.
That feature alone makes a news server with a decent client (e.g.
Thunderbird) a thousand times sup
Hi,
I have one addition to the list.
I haven't been part of the dev team so I'm not offended, if my proposal
won't be considered.
We have been using in our company's context slack for discussions and
information exchange. There are also other similar alternatives available.
pros:
– discussions
13 matches
Mail list logo
