Re: [darktable-devel] wanted: proof-reader for usermanual

2013-03-13 Thread Ulrich Pegelow
Am 12.03.2013 21:33, schrieb Ammon Riley: > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 1:20 PM, Ulrich Pegelow > wrote: >> Please indicate if you have timing issues; probably we can re-allocate work >> a bit in that case. > > If someone can take care of my part of section 3, that would help. > In the last week, I've

Re: [darktable-devel] wanted: proof-reader for usermanual

2013-03-13 Thread Colin Adams
I wanted the new executable too, so I can compare the manual with what the program is doing, and see any discrepancies, and anything I find hard to follow. Thanks to Jeremy's scripts, I have just managed to build 1.2 and it is running now. On 13 March 2013 11:58, Tobias Ellinghaus wrote: > Am Mi

Re: [darktable-devel] [PATCH] updated copyright year in about dialogue

2013-03-13 Thread Tobias Ellinghaus
Am Mittwoch, 13. März 2013, 10:36:25 schrub Simon Harhues: > Hi, Hey! > just noticed, that the about dialogue still shows 2012 as the > copyright year. Changed that to 2013. Maybe a method returning the > current year would be easier? :) > It looks as if the string was not translatable (don't kno

Re: [darktable-devel] wanted: proof-reader for usermanual

2013-03-13 Thread Tobias Ellinghaus
Am Mittwoch, 13. März 2013, 07:46:45 schrub Colin Adams: > On 12 March 2013 20:20, Ulrich Pegelow wrote: > > Hi Guys, > > > > here is the latest update of our usermanual: > > > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/z4ynpofg77vqw83/darktable-usermanual-130312.pdf > > > > Proofreading changes are complete

[darktable-devel] [PATCH] updated copyright year in about dialogue

2013-03-13 Thread Simon Harhues
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, just noticed, that the about dialogue still shows 2012 as the copyright year. Changed that to 2013. Maybe a method returning the current year would be easier? :) It looks as if the string was not translatable (don't know if this is how it should b

Re: [darktable-devel] wanted: proof-reader for usermanual

2013-03-13 Thread jeremy rosen
yes, darktable 1.2 has a different db format that can not be reverted back to 1.1.x easily I used the attached scripts to compile and run DT when developing. It installs DT in a completely separate subtree and uses the proper parameters to launch it don't use them as is (they have hard-coded path