Re: [darktable-user] Weird colors and difficult noise reduction compared to LightRoom or RawTherapee

On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 21:04:03 +0100, Saint Germain wrote: > On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 18:44:30 +0100, Saint Germain > wrote : > >> On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 15:14:02 +1100, Gary Parkinson >> wrote : >> >> > Try using the Darktable style "Denoise_chinese" >> > >> >

Re: [darktable-user] Weird colors and difficult noise reduction compared to LightRoom or RawTherapee

On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 13:47:31 -0800, "I. Ivanov" wrote : > Denoise_chinese is very impressive, thank you! > > I tried on 6400 ISO image and it works better than anything I used > before. > What is also surprising is that it doesn't use the noise profile at all... However it

Re: [darktable-user] Weird colors and difficult noise reduction compared to LightRoom or RawTherapee

Denoise_chinese is very impressive, thank you! I tried on 6400 ISO image and it works better than anything I used before. Regards, B On 2016-12-08 12:04 PM, Saint Germain wrote: On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 18:44:30 +0100, Saint Germain wrote : On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 15:14:02

Re: [darktable-user] Weird colors and difficult noise reduction compared to LightRoom or RawTherapee

On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 18:44:30 +0100, Saint Germain wrote : > On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 15:14:02 +1100, Gary Parkinson > wrote : > > > Try using the Darktable style "Denoise_chinese" > > > > https://dtstyle.net/ > > > > This is actually quite nice ! > Here

Re: [darktable-user] Weird colors and difficult noise reduction compared to LightRoom or RawTherapee

I received a png.xmp file ? Have you started from the raw (.srw) file ? If yes I think it should be a .srw.xmp file... Except if there is something I have misunderstood ? On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 10:33:48 -0800, Jack Bowling wrote : > As requested. here is an xmp of a screenshot of a

Re: [darktable-user] Weird colors and difficult noise reduction compared to LightRoom or RawTherapee

As requested. here is an xmp of a screenshot of a 100% view of the magazine image of the two women. Nothing complex. Image itself not attached due to size. If you wish, I could send it offlist. Jack On 12/08/2016 09:18 AM, Saint Germain wrote: Indeed lensfun doesn't have this lens in its

Re: [darktable-user] Weird colors and difficult noise reduction compared to LightRoom or RawTherapee

Le 08/12/2016 à 17:55, Tim Rolph a écrit : On Thursday 08 Dec 2016 08:13:27 Robert Krawitz wrote: On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 12:08:52 +0100, =?UTF-8?Q?St=c3=a9phane_Gourichon?= wrote: Here's the parameter dump: * disable base curve * disable profiled denoise * RAW noise reduction, default parameters

Re: [darktable-user] Weird colors and difficult noise reduction compared to LightRoom or RawTherapee

Hi, I am really not sure to be able to duplicate what you said. Could you provide perhaps an example (RAW+xmp) ? Thanks a lot On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 07:10:28 +0100, KOVÁCS István wrote : > Hi, > (Second attempt, sorry if you get a duplicate.) > > For very high ISO, i

Re: [darktable-user] Weird colors and difficult noise reduction compared to LightRoom or RawTherapee

On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 15:14:02 +1100, Gary Parkinson wrote : > Try using the Darktable style "Denoise_chinese" > > https://dtstyle.net/ > This is actually quite nice ! Here is the result I have got without touching anything: ttp://dl.free.fr/jisaMUzIg We still have a

Re: [darktable-user] Weird colors and difficult noise reduction compared to LightRoom or RawTherapee

Indeed lensfun doesn't have this lens in its database yet. After the noise profile, it's my next task to create the entry for this particular lens. Can you provide the xmp of your modifications to see exactly what you have done ? Thanks On Wed, 7 Dec 2016 23:54:08 -0800, Jack Bowling

Re: [darktable-user] Weird colors and difficult noise reduction compared to LightRoom or RawTherapee

On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 13:28:22 +0100, johannes hanika wrote : > hi pascal, > > On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Pascal Obry wrote: > > Jo, > > > > The profile (.json) is provided by the author in its original > > message. > > oh, thanks, i did indeed miss

Re: [darktable-user] Weird colors and difficult noise reduction compared to LightRoom or RawTherapee

On Thursday 08 Dec 2016 08:13:27 Robert Krawitz wrote: > On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 12:08:52 +0100, =?UTF-8?Q?St=c3=a9phane_Gourichon?= wrote: > > Here's the parameter dump: > > * disable base curve > > * disable profiled denoise > > * RAW noise reduction, default parameters > > RAW noise reduction,

Re: [darktable-user] Weird colors and difficult noise reduction compared to LightRoom or RawTherapee

On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 16:20:47 +0300, Roman Lebedev wrote: > On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Robert Krawitz wrote: >> On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 12:08:52 +0100, =?UTF-8?Q?St=c3=a9phane_Gourichon?= wrote: >>> Here's the parameter dump: >>> * disable base curve >>> * disable profiled

Re: [darktable-user] Weird colors and difficult noise reduction compared to LightRoom or RawTherapee

On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Robert Krawitz wrote: > On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 12:08:52 +0100, =?UTF-8?Q?St=c3=a9phane_Gourichon?= wrote: >> Here's the parameter dump: >> * disable base curve >> * disable profiled denoise >> * RAW noise reduction, default parameters > RAW noise

Re: [darktable-user] Weird colors and difficult noise reduction compared to LightRoom or RawTherapee

On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 12:08:52 +0100, =?UTF-8?Q?St=c3=a9phane_Gourichon?= wrote: > Here's the parameter dump: > * disable base curve > * disable profiled denoise > * RAW noise reduction, default parameters RAW noise reduction, unfortunately, won't help in my case, since my original is a JPEG.

Re: [darktable-user] Weird colors and difficult noise reduction compared to LightRoom or RawTherapee

hi pascal, On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Pascal Obry wrote: > Jo, > > The profile (.json) is provided by the author in its original message. oh, thanks, i did indeed miss that. but it only contains a profile for iso 25600? not for the 3200 the shot was taken at? > Fact is

Re: [darktable-user] Weird colors and difficult noise reduction compared to LightRoom or RawTherapee

Really good result indeed! 2016-12-08 12:08 GMT+01:00 Stéphane Gourichon < stephane_darkta...@gourichon.org>: > Le 08/12/2016 à 00:44, Saint Germain a écrit : > >> Hello, >> >> I just bought a Samsung NX1 and would like to use Darktable to process >> the RAW (SRW). >> >> However I really tried

Re: [darktable-user] Weird colors and difficult noise reduction compared to LightRoom or RawTherapee

Le 08/12/2016 à 00:44, Saint Germain a écrit : Hello, I just bought a Samsung NX1 and would like to use Darktable to process the RAW (SRW). However I really tried but I couldn't manage to get correct colors or to have a good noise reduction in high iso situation (low light). I've tried

Re: [darktable-user] Weird colors and difficult noise reduction compared to LightRoom or RawTherapee

Jo, The profile (.json) is provided by the author in its original message. Fact is darktable is not has good has Lightroom indeed (my recollection is that darktable was as good as Lr 3.x, but since Lr 4.x a new engine was developped and the noise reduction gives very good result). And indeed

Re: [darktable-user] Weird colors and difficult noise reduction compared to LightRoom or RawTherapee

seems we don't have a noise profile for your NX1. -jo On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 12:44 AM, Saint Germain wrote: > Hello, > > I just bought a Samsung NX1 and would like to use Darktable to process > the RAW (SRW). > > However I really tried but I couldn't manage to get correct