Re: [darktable-user] Duplicated version number created for existing image

2023-07-27 Thread Guillermo Rozas
Sorry, I'm not part of the developer team and know nothing of the internal code of darktable. But surely your post pn Pixls will attract the right people. Best regards, Guillermo On Thu, Jul 27, 2023, 11:02 Dusenberg wrote: > No problem, Guillermo, and thanks for your help. It does seem a big

Re: [darktable-user] Duplicated version number created for existing image

2023-07-27 Thread Dusenberg
No problem, Guillermo, and thanks for your help.  It does seem a big issue, particularly looking at the db, and  I do hope some more developer eyes see the post.  In meantime, do you know which files I would find the relevant 'create duplicate' functionality in the source code so I can dig into

Re: [darktable-user] Duplicated version number created for existing image

2023-07-27 Thread Guillermo Rozas
Hi, sorry for the late reply, I was a bit busy. Yes, pixls.us will probably give you more 'developer eyes' to check the problem. It's probably a big, so I would be prepared to file one on GitHub. Best regards, Guillermo On Thu, Jul 27, 2023, 06:21 Dusenberg wrote: > I have posted this on

Re: [darktable-user] Duplicated version number created for existing image

2023-07-27 Thread Dusenberg
I have posted this on pixls.us now it is back up. Dusenberg On 26/07/2023 20:39, Dusenberg wrote: Guillermo Since my last post, I have extracted data from the dt db image table for the image and versions concerned from three backup instances of the dt database going back 3 years:     a)

Re: [darktable-user] Duplicated version number created for existing image

2023-07-26 Thread Dusenberg
Guillermo Since my last post, I have extracted data from the dt db image table for the image and versions concerned from three backup instances of the dt database going back 3 years:     a) 2020-12-14 - pre-dt3.4.0, closest I can get to the original shot date     b) 2023-07-22 - dt4.2.1, before

Re: [darktable-user] Duplicated version number created for existing image

2023-07-26 Thread Dusenberg
Guillermo, Answers to your questions: a) xmp's are named '__<$VERSION>.RAWextension.xmp'     eg: original raw: '20200325_BonallyWoods_NIK_1413.NEF' version 3 xmp: '20200325_BonallyWoods_NIK_1413_03.NEF.xmp' b)  I've checked the files and the new duplicate '3' has overwritten the existing

Re: [darktable-user] Duplicated version number created for existing image

2023-07-25 Thread Guillermo Rozas
That sounds strange. How are the xmp files named? If the duplicate uses a previously used version number, does it also overwrites the corresponding xmp sidecar? Regards, Guillermo On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 1:06 PM Dusenberg wrote: > Hi Guillermo > > Yes the original and all duplicates were in the

Re: [darktable-user] Duplicated version number created for existing image

2023-07-25 Thread Dusenberg
Hi Guillermo Yes the original and all duplicates were in the database before making the new duplicate. Regards Dusenberg On 25/07/2023 15:03, Guillermo Rozas wrote: Hi, were the original and all the duplicates present in the database before making the duplicate? Regards, Guillermo On Tue,

Re: [darktable-user] Duplicated version number created for existing image

2023-07-25 Thread Guillermo Rozas
Hi, were the original and all the duplicates present in the database before making the duplicate? Regards, Guillermo On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 5:57 AM Dusenberg wrote: > Originally posted to darktable-dev list in error. > > dt 4.2.1 (OBS), Linux Mint 21,Ubuntu 22.04 jammy > > I have an image from

[darktable-user] Duplicated version number created for existing image

2023-07-25 Thread Dusenberg
Originally posted to darktable-dev list in error. dt 4.2.1 (OBS), Linux Mint 21,Ubuntu 22.04 jammy I have an image from March 2020 developed in darktable. I went back to it today to try another edit on it (its a monochrome rendition that I just can't get 'right'). However, today when I created