2013/8/5 Markus Jung
>
> > Which kind of JPEG would be useful? I shoot in RAW only, so I have no
> > 'ordinary' JPEG straight from the camera; I'd have to create it, unless
> the
> > embedded JPEG thumbnail is sufficient.
>
> I'm not absolutely sure, but i think the embedded JPEG equals the one
>
Am 05.08.2013 08:34, schrieb Marie-Noëlle Augendre:
> 2013/8/5 Torsten Bronger
>
>> Hallöchen!
>>
>> Marie-Noëlle Augendre writes:
>>
>>> I said a few days ago that the basic curve gives lobster skin to
>>> people. I'm now working on a whole batch of landscapes
>>> photographies, and for them to
2013/8/5 Torsten Bronger
> Hallöchen!
>
> Marie-Noëlle Augendre writes:
>
> > I said a few days ago that the basic curve gives lobster skin to
> > people. I'm now working on a whole batch of landscapes
> > photographies, and for them too the colors are very wrong, with
> > greens and yellows com
Are you exporting downscaled? If high quality resampling is off
(default), the denoising results depend on the export size and may look
different from the 1:1 darktable view. For this reason, i do all final
exports either with hq resampling enabled or downscale them outside
darktable manually.
Reg
Hallöchen!
Marie-Noëlle Augendre writes:
> I said a few days ago that the basic curve gives lobster skin to
> people. I'm now working on a whole batch of landscapes
> photographies, and for them too the colors are very wrong, with
> greens and yellows completely oversaturated.
Could you provide
* Federico Bruni [08-04-13 19:38]:
> I've used denoise (non local means) to reduce the noise of a picture
> taken without flash in a dark scene.
> The result in DT window looked ok to me, but apparently the denoise is
> missing in the exported image.
>
> I've uploaded the raw, the xmp and the jpe
* Federico Bruni [08-04-13 19:20]:
> 2013/8/5 Patrick Shanahan
>
> > * Federico Bruni [08-04-13 19:06]:
> > > It would be nice if the filmstrip in darkroom showed the number of the
> > > current image I'm working on.
> > > Darktable is aware of the number of images I've filtered in light table
Hi all
I've used denoise (non local means) to reduce the noise of a picture taken
without flash in a dark scene.
The result in DT window looked ok to me, but apparently the denoise is
missing in the exported image.
I've uploaded the raw, the xmp and the jpeg files, plus a screenshot of
what I see
2013/8/5 Patrick Shanahan
> * Federico Bruni [08-04-13 19:06]:
> > It would be nice if the filmstrip in darkroom showed the number of the
> > current image I'm working on.
> > Darktable is aware of the number of images I've filtered in light table
> > before entering the darkroom, I'd like to se
I see that when selecting auto exposure that nearly the entire image is
automatically selected, ~97%, and that it is possible to select an area of
the image you would prefer the auto exposure to reflect but I cannot
determine the method to make darktable actually use the selected area.
ie: opening
* Federico Bruni [08-04-13 19:06]:
> It would be nice if the filmstrip in darkroom showed the number of the
> current image I'm working on.
> Darktable is aware of the number of images I've filtered in light table
> before entering the darkroom, I'd like to see the number in the top bar
> updating
It would be nice if the filmstrip in darkroom showed the number of the
current image I'm working on.
Darktable is aware of the number of images I've filtered in light table
before entering the darkroom, I'd like to see the number in the top bar
updating as I work on the images: 40 of 130 images, 41
2013/8/4 Markus Jung
> You better read the responses you get here more carefully. It is not the
> first time you participate a discussion about base curve.
Things appear to get worse with later DT versions, and I've read other
people complaints about the base curve recently.
I've given up tryin
What camera do you have? I think I somehow see what you say with the Nikon
alternate colorcurve.
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 10:10 PM, Marie-Noëlle Augendre wrote:
> I said a few days ago that the basic curve gives lobster skin to people.
> I'm now working on a whole batch of landscapes photographie
You better read the responses you get here more carefully. It is not the
first time you participate a discussion about base curve. I will try to
give you a short summary.
The camera sensor reacts almost linear to exposure. Human perception
does not, it can be approximated by some exponential funct
I said a few days ago that the basic curve gives lobster skin to people.
I'm now working on a whole batch of landscapes photographies, and for them
too the colors are very wrong, with greens and yellows completely
oversaturated.
In both cases, I have to deactivate the basic curve in order to start
Hi,
I found the issue. My screen was indeed uncalibrated due to KDE issues. I
fixed the problem and now my exports look virtually the same regardless of
whether I export using sRGB or display profile.
More information about KDE colormanagment can be found here:
http://userbase.kde.org/Color_Mana
Hi Johannes,
Here is another example:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/fo8iqgrasilrm7p/rb2zNRt0ZC
I have included the two jpgs with display profile and sRGB and also xmp and
the original raw file.
Timo
On 4 August 2013 22:34, Timo Mohnani wrote:
> Hi Johannes,
>
> Here is another example including
Hallöchen!
John P Santos writes:
> Thanks! I found an ICC profile for the Canon T3i, named 6000
> (which I guess would be for the 600D). That did the trick. I've
> been taking a lot of pictures of the sky, and all the subtlety of
> the colour has been restored! So much better. Unfortunately
Hi Devs and contributors.
I've just edited a shoot I did yesterday.
Subject was surfboard blanks being shaped for a new range at a local surf shop.
Very industrial, worked really well in monochrome.
I did all the editing in DT.
It was an absolute pleasure.
So this is a thank you from me for such
20 matches
Mail list logo
