-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am 16.11.2013 22:11, schrieb Tobias Ellinghaus:
> Am Samstag, 16. November 2013, 19:10:41 schrieb Markus Jung:
>> Am 16.11.2013 11:15, schrieb Tobias Ellinghaus:
>>> The alternative would be to always reset the selection when
>>> entering darkroom (
Am Samstag, 16. November 2013, 19:10:41 schrieb Markus Jung:
> Am 16.11.2013 11:15, schrieb Tobias Ellinghaus:
> > The alternative would be to always reset the selection when
> > entering darkroom (currently this is only done when < 2 images are
> > selected) but that would hurt more people as sele
I remembered now, I experimented with custom ICC profiles when they
only could be placed in /usr/share/darktable, so I made a symlink to
~/.darktable. So ignore me.
But it is /color/, not /colour/.
On Sun, 17 Nov 2013 00:46:59 +0400
parafin wrote:
> Hmm, just rechecked, turns out it is ~/.confi
Hmm, just rechecked, turns out it is ~/.config/darktable now and was
changed quite a long time ago. Sorry for confusion, just missed when it
was changed.
On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 20:56:59 +0100
Togan Muftuoglu wrote:
> > "parafin" == parafin writes:
>
> parafin> since always AFAIK, the rea
> "parafin" == parafin writes:
parafin> since always AFAIK, the reasoning I guess is that ICC profiles
parafin> aren't really configuration, but data.
Then have a look at http://www.darktable.org/usermanual/ch03s04s08.html.php
or to quote for the a quick response
3.4.8.3. Output co
since always AFAIK, the reasoning I guess is that ICC profiles aren't
really configuration, but data.
On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 20:06:14 +0100
Togan Muftuoglu wrote:
> > "parafin" == parafin writes:
>
> parafin> ~/.darktable/color/out, not ~/.config/darktable/color/out On Sat,
>
> Since wh
> "parafin" == parafin writes:
parafin> ~/.darktable/color/out, not ~/.config/darktable/color/out On Sat,
Since when is this so ? All darktable configurations live in
~/.config/darktable as far I know
--
Life is endless possibilities
~/.darktable/color/out, not ~/.config/darktable/color/out
On Sat, 16 Nov 2013 19:34:46 +0100
Togan Muftuoglu wrote:
> > "Arnaud" == Arnaud Thevenet writes:
>
> Arnaud> Hello,
> Arnaud> Thank you for providing such a nice software and being available
> for
> Arnaud> support.
>
> "Arnaud" == Arnaud Thevenet writes:
Arnaud> Hello,
Arnaud> Thank you for providing such a nice software and being available
for
Arnaud> support.
Arnaud> My issue is simple : I do not see any of my .icc profiles in the
Arnaud> Darktable lists. Not in output colour prof
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am 16.11.2013 11:15, schrieb Tobias Ellinghaus:
> The alternative would be to always reset the selection when
> entering darkroom (currently this is only done when < 2 images are
> selected) but that would hurt more people as selections would
> nev
Hi,
It's not a error directly,
Please have a look at this change log :
http://www.darktable.org/redmine/projects/darktable/repository/revisions/1ef59835ad8c9f77274a94644d11d5dda23c15d0
It's to resolve a bug
(http://www.darktable.org/redmine/issues/9567#change-23835 )
but remove a feature, fee
Hello,
Thank you for providing such a nice software and being available for
support.
My issue is simple : I do not see any of my .icc profiles in the
Darktable lists. Not in output colour profile, not in input colour
profile, not in export profile.
My goal is to soft proof with the icc profil
On 16/11/13 12:19, Rob Dean wrote:
Since the suggested way of using profiled denoise is to use non-local
means with the lightness blend mode and then create another instance of
profiled denoise with the wavelets mode using the color blend mode I'm
wondering if this could be combined somehow to gi
Since the suggested way of using profiled denoise is to use non-local
means with the lightness blend mode and then create another instance of
profiled denoise with the wavelets mode using the color blend mode I'm
wondering if this could be combined somehow to give more of a "one
click" profiled
Am Freitag, 15. November 2013, 19:41:16 schrieb Patrick Shanahan:
> As of darktable-1.3_1383_g5d0ad4e_git-3.1.TM.x86_64, export action is
> again inconsistent between lighttable mode and darkroom mode. I hope this
> is in error. In lighttable mode all *selected* images are exported, but
> in dark
I agree with you, but you wrote to the wrong mailing list. Discussions
like that should take place at darktable-devel.
Regards,
Markus
Am 16.11.2013 01:41, schrieb Patrick Shanahan:
> As of darktable-1.3_1383_g5d0ad4e_git-3.1.TM.x86_64, export action is
> again inconsistent between lighttable mod
16 matches
Mail list logo
