If you launch the System Settings in Gnome, choose Device Color
Profiles, then select your monitor and/or printer from the list and
choose Add Profile in the bottom right.
I find it very easy in Gnome. If you use dispcalGUI to create your color
profile, it will automatically add it for you.
Ri
Il 13 novembre 2014 22:02:07 CET, David Vincent-Jones ha
scritto:
>I have switched over to using the gnome desktop and do have the
>gnome-color-manager installed but cannot find how to add the profiles
>for my monitors and printers. I do have the required profiles on my
>system.
>
You can add
David Vincent-Jones píše v Čt 13. 11. 2014 v 13:02 -0800:
> I have switched over to using the gnome desktop and do have the
> gnome-color-manager installed but cannot find how to add the profiles
> for my monitors and printers. I do have the required profiles on my
> system.
>
AFAIK, there is
Michael Below píše v Po 03. 11. 2014 v 17:14 +0100:
> Hi,
>
Hi,
> the graphics card is a NVidia GTX 750ti card, precisely this one:
> http://www.evga.com/Products/Product.aspx?pn=02G-P4-3751-KR
>
Have you got it work with any other application to really display 30bit
depth?
I have the same card
I have switched over to using the gnome desktop and do have the
gnome-color-manager installed but cannot find how to add the profiles
for my monitors and printers. I do have the required profiles on my
system.
Strangely when I used KDE the setup was much easier!
David
-
On Thu, 2014-11-13 at 17:46 +0100, Matthias Bodenbinder wrote:
> When I try this with default settings, reducing exposure by -2 EV and setting
> highlight reconstruction to "restore color" I get a nice picture with good
> highlights.
>
> Using darktable 1.5+2272~g575742b
>
> Matthias
I agree .
First, have you checked if your have any free space in your home partition?
El 13/11/2014 14:10, "Francesco Scaglioni" escribió:
> Using GIT from a couple of weeks ago on attempting to launch
> DT on thsi ubuntu 14.04 system I got the error "moving
> database into new XDG directory structure" and
Restoring color within the module for highlight reconstruction did
indeed the trick and worked wonders. Thanks for the hint! Darktable is
now on par with the other programs I tried.
What I don't understand though: Why isn't this integrated into the
"normal" tool for highlights and shadows or
Hi,
Apologies for thread hyjacking but direct messages to the
list seem never to get delivered. I have been using DT from
GIT for quite some tim ewith no problem. Worked fine
yesterday afternoon. Then this morning I was met with the
"moving database into new XDG directory structure" error on
st
> I'm using Darktable for a while now, believing that it is indeed a
> great program with an amazing set of features.
>
> But lately it has come to my attention that the handling of highlights
> in not on par with other programs, like shown in this example:
>
> http://abload.de/img/dsc_1284dt_1a8u
When I try this with default settings, reducing exposure by -2 EV and setting
highlight reconstruction to "restore color" I get a nice picture with good
highlights.
Using darktable 1.5+2272~g575742b
Matthias
--
Compre
http://picpaste.com/pics/highlights-Ars8Wv8B.1415893141.jpg
my result. xmp in jpg.
-jo
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Rob Z. Smith wrote:
> Which version of dt are you using?
>
>
>
> With dt 1.4 or an early 1.5 I had much the same problem and whatever I
> did couldn’t get near lightroom f
Which version of dt are you using?
With dt 1.4 or an early 1.5 I had much the same problem and whatever I did
couldn’t get near lightroom for cloud detail. However there have been big
improvements and after updating to current master two or three months ago dt
was much better, in fact at l
I didn't pay much attention to the shadows. Of course they could be
optimized, but the difference in the highlights is much more evident,
especially with those nasty tonal breaks using Darktable. When I tried
to recover the highlights I ended up with the image I provided. Other
programs do a
I'm not sure that's a fair comparison, you've got a lot more detail in
the shadows in the Darktable image. Also looks like the contrast is
quite different.
--
Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7.
Monitor 10 serve
Hello!
I'm using Darktable for a while now, believing that it is indeed a great
program with an amazing set of features.
But lately it has come to my attention that the handling of highlights
in not on par with other programs, like shown in this example:
http://abload.de/img/dsc_1284dt_1a8
Using GIT from a couple of weeks ago on attempting to launch
DT on thsi ubuntu 14.04 system I got the error "moving
database into new XDG directory structure" and DT fails to
launch. Thought I must have done a stupid so updated GIT as
of about 10 minutes ago ( 1135 GMT ) and still the same
error.
There are some confusion here. So to simplify
Profiles have much more information than just color space.The lighting of
the original subject (and surrounding) is very important for an input
profile. Unless you have specific input profiles for every lighting, it is
not so useful to have an input pr
Nope, if the input image is a jpeg the 'input profile' if one was used at all
would have been applied by the capture device/system so that has already been
done for your jpeg and it is not needed except for raws. Specifically for dt
an input profile isn't needed even for raws as we have colour
19 matches
Mail list logo
