Re: convert to/from .NET's System.DateTime?

2003-11-23 Thread Eugene van der Pijll
David Garamond schreef: > Is there a module/routine to do this? From .NET Framework SDK > documentation: "Time values are measured in 100-nanosecond units called > ticks, and a particular date is the number of ticks since 12:00 > midnight, January 1, 1 C.E. in the GregorianCalendar calendar. For

Re: threaded list archive?

2003-11-23 Thread Dave Rolsky
On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Someone should add that to the developer section on the website. :) > > Or even better to the "Mailing List" section of the website. I'm happy to > make the change in CVS if that would help (pretty sure I still have > access). But someone would ha

Re: threaded list archive?

2003-11-23 Thread kellan
> Check out http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=perl-datetime&r=1&w=2, which > has everything since 2001-05 Thanks Dave. > Someone should add that to the developer section on the website. :) Or even better to the "Mailing List" section of the website. I'm happy to make the change in CVS if that wou

Re: convert to/from .NET's System.DateTime?

2003-11-23 Thread Dave Rolsky
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, David Garamond wrote: > Is there a module/routine to do this? From .NET Framework SDK > documentation: "Time values are measured in 100-nanosecond units called > ticks, and a particular date is the number of ticks since 12:00 > midnight, January 1, 1 C.E. in the GregorianCalen

convert to/from .NET's System.DateTime?

2003-11-23 Thread David Garamond
Is there a module/routine to do this? From .NET Framework SDK documentation: "Time values are measured in 100-nanosecond units called ticks, and a particular date is the number of ticks since 12:00 midnight, January 1, 1 C.E. in the GregorianCalendar calendar. For example, a ticks value of 3124

ANNOUNCE: Params::Validate 0.70

2003-11-23 Thread Dave Rolsky
0.70 Nov 23, 2003 - Any validation call that used a callback leaked memory when using the XS version. This was introduced in 0.67, when callbacks started receiving a reference to the parameters as a second argument. Reported by Eugene van der Pijll. Since DateTime.pm (and maybe other DateTime m

Re: Memory leak?

2003-11-23 Thread Dave Rolsky
On Sun, 23 Nov 2003, Todd Lorenz wrote: > Mr. van der Pijll -- Thanks very much; your observations on > Params::Validate do check out on my system. Is running the pure Perl > version of PV considered deprecated, or is there otherwise any reason > why I shouldn't use it? It's much slower. I just

unsubscibe

2003-11-23 Thread Sebastian Krug
Pleas unsubscribe me from the list. Thanks

Re: Memory leak?

2003-11-23 Thread Todd Lorenz
Mr. van der Pijll -- Thanks very much; your observations on Params::Validate do check out on my system. Is running the pure Perl version of PV considered deprecated, or is there otherwise any reason why I shouldn't use it? (Mr. Rolsky suggested in another email that I upgrade to PV version 0.69,