Who is the point of contact for AS on this issue?
-J
--
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, Dave Rolsky wrote:
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
Not that I'm blaming DateTime; there's plenty of blame to go around.
ActiveState is to blame for (as rumor has it) having someone maybe
sometime complete
On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, John Peacock wrote:
Module::Build already has it's own
way to tell about dependencies but afaik no one uses it except
CPANPLUS.
And what is worse is that the Module::Build dependencies are treated as
/suggestions/, and will not throw an error if one is not met. I just got a
c
Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
Module::Build already has it's own
way to tell about dependencies but afaik no one uses it except
CPANPLUS.
And what is worse is that the Module::Build dependencies are treated as
/suggestions/, and will not throw an error if one is not met. I just
got a cpantester
On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 10:48:19AM -0600, Dave Rolsky wrote:
> Clearly the easiest for AS is to simple install Module::Build and its
> dependencies before trying to build PPMs.
Agreed. But IIRC it has no non-core dependencies.
> >What's the way forward in all this? I don't know. I do know tha
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
Not that I'm blaming DateTime; there's plenty of blame to go around.
ActiveState is to blame for (as rumor has it) having someone maybe
sometime completely rewrite their build scripts, instead of just
quickly addressing this deficiency. DateTime i
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 04:32:39PM -0600, Dave Rolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Nov 2004, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
>
> >Has anyone that is a win32/activeperl user complained to Activestate
> >that they are not providing a DateTime PPM? I assume that DateTime is
> >still working on win
That is goofy... has anyone opened a trouble ticket on this or complained
directly?
-J
--
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004, Dave Rolsky wrote:
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
Has anyone that is a win32/activeperl user complained to Activestate that
they are not providing a DateTime PPM? I assume that
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
Has anyone that is a win32/activeperl user complained to Activestate
that they are not providing a DateTime PPM? I assume that DateTime is
still working on win32 but the PPM status page shows that DT 0.22 is
failing to build on _all_ platforms.
It's cau
Has anyone that is a win32/activeperl user complained to Activestate that they
are not providing a DateTime PPM? I assume that DateTime is still working on
win32 but the PPM status page shows that DT 0.22 is failing to build on _all_
platforms.
-J
--
-- Forwarded message --
Date: S
