RE: DM6467 EVM u-boot Nand flash issue

2009-04-04 Thread Neeraj Tandon
Thanks Sandeep, I need USB read support in u-boot so uImage and filesystem can be read off a USB memory stick. This is the reason I wanted to move to a version other than TI released u-boot 1.2 for 6467. Would you be knowing if any u-boot version supports USB read from U-boot for DM6467 ?

RE: DM6467 EVM u-boot Nand flash issue

2009-04-04 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Neeraj, The latest U_boot does not have support for DM6467. You are compiling for the DVEVM. This is meant for DM6446. Compiling for DM6446 and using it for DM6467 EVM will not work. Withing TI we have got U-Boot working on 1.3.4. Maybe you can use that. I will add support for DM646

DM6467 EVM u-boot Nand flash issue

2009-04-04 Thread Neeraj Tandon
Hi, I posted in this in u-boot list. Since this is more specific to Davinci I am posting here. If anyone has used recent version of u-boot for DM6467 and managed to boot from NAND flash then let me know. Following is the issue I am facing with U-boot. I am using u-boot version 2009.3 for TI

Re: [PATCH 3/6] ARM: DaVinci: NTOSD_644XA: Add EMAC device

2009-04-04 Thread Jorge Luis Zapata Muga
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 7:47 PM, David Brownell wrote: > On Friday 03 April 2009, Jorge Luis Zapata Muga wrote: >> @@ -27,6 +28,17 @@ static struct davinci_uart_config >> ntosd_644xa_uart_config __initdata = { > > Looks like there are linewrap problems ... > > >> .enabled_uarts = (1 << 0),

Re: [PATCH 4/6] ARM: DaVinci: NTOSD_644XA: Add I2C device

2009-04-04 Thread Jorge Luis Zapata Muga
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 7:49 PM, David Brownell wrote: > On Friday 03 April 2009, Jorge Luis Zapata Muga wrote: > >> +static struct davinci_i2c_platform_data ntosd_644xa_i2c_pdata = { >> +   .bus_freq   = 20 /* kHz */, >> +   .bus_delay  = 100 /* usec */, >> +}; >> + > > Did you rea

RE: [PATCH] ARM: DaVinci: emac: Use MACSRCADDR if valid before random

2009-04-04 Thread Nori, Sekhar
From: Troy Kisky Sent: Saturday, April 04, 2009 7:37 AM > > If the MACSRCADDR register has been initialized by bootloader, > then use that instead of a random mac. Where was this scenario useful? If intent is to use the initialization done by U-Boot, using eth= bootarg would be a better approach