On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 07:25:43PM +0300, Yusuf Caglar AKYUZ wrote:
> Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
>
> > Another heads up - the "next" branch is now rebased with vpfe v3 patches.
>
> Thanks again. Now I'm using your "next" branch for my own development.
FYI, I've rebased the "next" branch of linux-d
David Brownell writes:
> On Monday 29 June 2009, Yusuf Caglar AKYUZ wrote:
>> >> BTW, does this tree includes musb patches which was submitted to usb
>> >> mailing list. but yet not included in mainline and davinci trees?
>> >
>> > Can you please be more specific which musb patches you are refer
On Monday 29 June 2009, Yusuf Caglar AKYUZ wrote:
> >> BTW, does this tree includes musb patches which was submitted to usb
> >> mailing list. but yet not included in mainline and davinci trees?
> >
> > Can you please be more specific which musb patches you are referring to?
> >
>
> I must admit
Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> Another heads up - the "next" branch is now rebased with vpfe v3 patches.
>
Thanks again. Now I'm using your "next" branch for my own development.
>> BTW, does this tree includes musb patches which was submitted to usb
>> mailing list. but yet not included in mainline
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 05:09:12PM +0300, Yusuf Caglar AKYUZ wrote:
> Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 12:46:31AM +0300, Yusuf Caglar AKYUZ wrote:
> >> Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote:
> >>> We have been using the arago git tree and I don't see any of the issues
> >>> that you ar
Denys Dmytriyenko wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 12:46:31AM +0300, Yusuf Caglar AKYUZ wrote:
>> Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote:
>>> We have been using the arago git tree and I don't see any of the issues
>>> that you are seeing. Could you use arago tree and Let me know if you see
>>> the same is
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 12:46:31AM +0300, Yusuf Caglar AKYUZ wrote:
> Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote:
> > We have been using the arago git tree and I don't see any of the issues
> > that you are seeing. Could you use arago tree and Let me know if you see
> > the same issue? This tree is being test
; >To: Kevin Hilman
> >Cc: Karicheri, Muralidharan; davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com
> >Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11 - v3] ARM: DaVinci: Video: DM355/DM6446 VPFE
> >Capture driver
> >
> >Kevin Hilman wrote:
> >> m-kariche...@ti.com writes:
> >
Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote:
> Yusuf,
>
> I am not sure what is the state of vpfe branch maintained by Kevin.
>
> We have been using the arago git tree and I don't see any of the issues that
> you are seeing. Could you use arago tree and Let me know if you see the same
> issue? This tree is b
.@gmail.com]
>Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 3:37 PM
>To: Kevin Hilman
>Cc: Karicheri, Muralidharan; davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com
>Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11 - v3] ARM: DaVinci: Video: DM355/DM6446 VPFE
>Capture driver
>
>Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> m-kariche...@ti
Kevin Hilman wrote:
> m-kariche...@ti.com writes:
>
>> From: Muralidharan Karicheri
>>
>> Big Thanks to all reviewers who have contributed to this driver
>> by reviewing and offering valuable comments.
>>
>> VPFE Capture driver for DaVinci Media SOCs :- DM355 and DM6446
>>
>> This is the version
On Mon, 2009-06-22 at 10:21 -0400, Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Check the following log...
>
> The crash doesn't seem to directly related to this patch. Did you get any
> error while applying the patch. You seem to have not build tvp514x. So no sub
> device available to register in
cidsp.com [mailto:davinci-linux-open-source-
>bounces+m-karicheri2=ti@linux.davincidsp.com] On Behalf Of Steve Chen
>Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 3:46 PM
>To: davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com
>Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11 - v3] ARM: DaVinci: Video: DM355/DM6446 VPFE
>Capture driver
com] On Behalf
>Of Scott Sweeny
>Sent: Friday, June 19, 2009 2:57 PM
>To: davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com
>Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11 - v3] ARM: DaVinci: Video: DM355/DM6446 VPFE
>Capture driver
>
>On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 16:11 -0400, m-kariche...@ti.com wrote:
>> F
On Friday 19 June 2009 22:49:07 Kevin Hilman wrote:
> m-kariche...@ti.com writes:
> > From: Muralidharan Karicheri
> >
> > Big Thanks to all reviewers who have contributed to this driver
> > by reviewing and offering valuable comments.
> >
> > VPFE Capture driver for DaVinci Media SOCs :- DM355 an
m-kariche...@ti.com writes:
> From: Muralidharan Karicheri
>
> Big Thanks to all reviewers who have contributed to this driver
> by reviewing and offering valuable comments.
>
> VPFE Capture driver for DaVinci Media SOCs :- DM355 and DM6446
>
> This is the version v3 of the patch series. This is
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 15:45 -0400, Steve Chen wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 14:56 -0400, Scott Sweeny wrote:
> ...
> > vpfe-capture: vpfe vpss master & slave clocks disabled
> > dm644x_ccdc_init
> > vpfe_register_ccdc_device: DM6446 CCDC
> > dm355_ccdc_init
> > vpfe_register_ccdc_device: DM355 CCD
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 14:56 -0400, Scott Sweeny wrote:
...
> vpfe-capture: vpfe vpss master & slave clocks disabled
> dm644x_ccdc_init
> vpfe_register_ccdc_device: DM6446 CCDC
> dm355_ccdc_init
> vpfe_register_ccdc_device: DM355 CCDC
> TCP cubic registered
...
Noticed above lines in the kernel boo
On Wed, 2009-06-17 at 16:11 -0400, m-kariche...@ti.com wrote:
> From: Muralidharan Karicheri
>
> Big Thanks to all reviewers who have contributed to this driver
> by reviewing and offering valuable comments.
>
> VPFE Capture driver for DaVinci Media SOCs :- DM355 and DM6446
>
> This is the vers
From: Muralidharan Karicheri
Big Thanks to all reviewers who have contributed to this driver
by reviewing and offering valuable comments.
VPFE Capture driver for DaVinci Media SOCs :- DM355 and DM6446
This is the version v3 of the patch series. This is the reworked
version of the driver based o
20 matches
Mail list logo
