[PATCH 0/9]

2011-05-17 Thread Ben Gardiner
The davinci platforms are mapping their io regions using iotables. This patch series converts them to mapping using ioremap. This series is based on-top-of '[RFC PATCH v3] Consolidate SRAM support' from Russell King. The first patch in the series is a squash of the neccessary changes as reported

[PATCH 0/9] davinci: EDMA updates

2009-12-01 Thread Sudhakar Rajashekhara
This patch set corrects some issues with the existing EDMA driver and also adds support for EDMA resource (channel/slots) sharing between two processors (say ARM and DSP). The patch set has been tested on DM646x, OMAP-L137 and OMAP-L138 EVM boards. Sudhakar Rajashekhara (9): davinci: Correct re

Re: [PATCH 0/9] davinci: EDMA updates

2010-01-05 Thread Kevin Hilman
Sudhakar Rajashekhara writes: > This patch set corrects some issues with the existing EDMA > driver and also adds support for EDMA resource (channel/slots) > sharing between two processors (say ARM and DSP). > > The patch set has been tested on DM646x, OMAP-L137 and OMAP-L138 > EVM boards. Hi Su

RE: [PATCH 0/9] davinci: EDMA updates

2010-01-06 Thread Sudhakar Rajashekhara
Kevin, On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 04:12:57, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Sudhakar Rajashekhara writes: > > > This patch set corrects some issues with the existing EDMA > > driver and also adds support for EDMA resource (channel/slots) > > sharing between two processors (say ARM and DSP). > > > > The patch

Re: [PATCH 0/9] davinci: EDMA updates

2010-01-06 Thread Troy Kisky
Kevin Hilman wrote: > Sudhakar Rajashekhara writes: > >> This patch set corrects some issues with the existing EDMA >> driver and also adds support for EDMA resource (channel/slots) >> sharing between two processors (say ARM and DSP). >> >> The patch set has been tested on DM646x, OMAP-L137 and O

Re: [PATCH 0/9] davinci: EDMA updates

2010-01-06 Thread Kevin Hilman
Troy Kisky writes: > Kevin Hilman wrote: >> Sudhakar Rajashekhara writes: >> >>> This patch set corrects some issues with the existing EDMA >>> driver and also adds support for EDMA resource (channel/slots) >>> sharing between two processors (say ARM and DSP). >>> >>> The patch set has been tes

RE: [PATCH 0/9] davinci: EDMA updates

2010-01-07 Thread Nori, Sekhar
On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 06:05:12, Kevin Hilman wrote: > Troy Kisky writes: > > > Kevin Hilman wrote: > >> Sudhakar Rajashekhara writes: > >> > >>> This patch set corrects some issues with the existing EDMA > >>> driver and also adds support for EDMA resource (channel/slots) > >>> sharing between

Re: [PATCH 0/9] davinci: EDMA updates

2010-01-07 Thread Kevin Hilman
"Nori, Sekhar" writes: > On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 06:05:12, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> Troy Kisky writes: >> >> > Kevin Hilman wrote: >> >> Sudhakar Rajashekhara writes: >> >> >> >>> This patch set corrects some issues with the existing EDMA >> >>> driver and also adds support for EDMA resource (cha

Re: [PATCH 0/9] davinci: EDMA updates

2010-01-07 Thread Caglar Akyuz
On Thursday 07 January 2010 09:22:33 pm Kevin Hilman wrote: > "Nori, Sekhar" writes: > > On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 06:05:12, Kevin Hilman wrote: > >> Troy Kisky writes: > >> > Kevin Hilman wrote: > >> >> Sudhakar Rajashekhara writes: > >> >>> This patch set corrects some issues with the existing E

[PATCH 0/9] post cpdma/mdio refactoring fixes

2010-09-13 Thread Cyril Chemparathy
This series consists of fixes for issues found during broader testing of the davinci cpdma/mdio separation series. The fixes included here are: 1. Ability to force 100/full rather than auto-detect phy. This is necessary for the external switch on the da830 evm platform 2. Fix end-of-qu

Re: [PATCH 0/9] post cpdma/mdio refactoring fixes

2010-09-14 Thread Kevin Hilman
Cyril Chemparathy writes: > This series consists of fixes for issues found during broader testing of the > davinci cpdma/mdio separation series. > > The fixes included here are: > > 1. Ability to force 100/full rather than auto-detect phy. This is necessary > for the external switch on th

[PATCH 0/9] ARM: davinci: DT boot support for DA850

2012-09-06 Thread Sekhar Nori
This series adds basic DT boot support for DA850 EVM and EnBW CMC board. Heiko Schocher (2): ARM: davinci: da850: add SoC DT data ARM: davinci: add support for am1808 based EnBW CMC board Sekhar Nori (7): ARM: davinci: uncompress.h: bail out if uart not initialized ARM: davinci: serial: p

[PATCH 0/9] Feature enhancement of VPFE/CCDC Capture driver

2010-01-04 Thread hvaibhav
From: Vaibhav Hiremath While adding support for AM3517/05 devices I have implemented/came-across these features/enhancement/bug-fixes for VPFE-Capture driver. Also the important change added is, to introduced "ti-media" directory for all TI devices. Vaibhav Hiremath (9): Makfile:Removed dupli

[PATCH 0/9] ARM: DaVinci: Video: DM355/DM6446 VPFE Capture driver

2009-05-15 Thread m-karicheri2
From: Muralidharan Karicheri VPFE Capture driver for DaVinci Media SOCs :- DM355 and DM6446 These patches add support for VPFE (Video Processing Front End) based video capture on DM355 and DM6446 EVMs. For more details on the hardware configuration and capabilities, please refer the vpfe_capture

RE: [PATCH 0/9] Feature enhancement of VPFE/CCDC Capture driver

2010-01-10 Thread Hiremath, Vaibhav
hav > Subject: [PATCH 0/9] Feature enhancement of VPFE/CCDC Capture driver > > From: Vaibhav Hiremath > > While adding support for AM3517/05 devices I have implemented/came- > across > these features/enhancement/bug-fixes for VPFE-Capture driver. > > Also the im

RE: [PATCH 0/9] Feature enhancement of VPFE/CCDC Capture driver

2010-01-11 Thread Karicheri, Muralidharan
t: Monday, January 11, 2010 1:29 AM >To: Hiremath, Vaibhav; linux-me...@vger.kernel.org >Cc: linux-o...@vger.kernel.org; hverk...@xs4all.nl; davinci-linux-open- >sou...@linux.davincidsp.com; Karicheri, Muralidharan >Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/9] Feature enhancement of VPFE/CCDC Capture driver

Re: [PATCH 0/9] ARM: DaVinci: Video: DM355/DM6446 VPFE Capture driver

2009-05-17 Thread Ottavio Campana
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 02:35:19PM -0400, m-kariche...@ti.com wrote: > From: Muralidharan Karicheri > > VPFE Capture driver for DaVinci Media SOCs :- DM355 and DM6446 maybe the question is silly, but how do these patches relate to the merge with Linus' tree? I mean, will it be merged for 2

RE: [PATCH 0/9] ARM: DaVinci: Video: DM355/DM6446 VPFE Capture driver

2009-05-18 Thread Karicheri, Muralidharan
-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com >Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] ARM: DaVinci: Video: DM355/DM6446 VPFE Capture >driver > >On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 02:35:19PM -0400, m-kariche...@ti.com wrote: >> From: Muralidharan Karicheri >> >> VPFE Capture driver for DaVinci Media SOCs :- D

Re: [PATCH 0/9] ARM: DaVinci: Video: DM355/DM6446 VPFE Capture driver

2009-06-01 Thread Kevin Hilman
m-kariche...@ti.com writes: > From: Muralidharan Karicheri > > VPFE Capture driver for DaVinci Media SOCs :- DM355 and DM6446 > > These patches add support for VPFE (Video Processing Front End) based > video capture on DM355 and DM6446 EVMs. For more details on the hardware > configuration and ca

Re: [PATCH 0/9] ARM: DaVinci: Video: DM355/DM6446 VPFE Capture driver

2009-06-01 Thread Ottavio Campana
Kevin Hilman wrote: FYI I've added this series to a staging branch of DaVinci git after some minor compile updates for the new kernel. See branch 'staging/vpfe'. cool. I think I'll try it in a few days. ___ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list

Re: [PATCH 0/9] ARM: DaVinci: Video: DM355/DM6446 VPFE Capture driver

2009-06-03 Thread Koen Kooi
On 02-06-09 02:19, Kevin Hilman wrote: m-kariche...@ti.com writes: From: Muralidharan Karicheri VPFE Capture driver for DaVinci Media SOCs :- DM355 and DM6446 These patches add support for VPFE (Video Processing Front End) based video capture on DM355 and DM6446 EVMs. For more details on the

Re: [PATCH 0/9] ARM: DaVinci: Video: DM355/DM6446 VPFE Capture driver

2009-06-03 Thread Kevin Hilman
Koen Kooi writes: > On 02-06-09 02:19, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> m-kariche...@ti.com writes: >> >>> From: Muralidharan Karicheri >>> >>> VPFE Capture driver for DaVinci Media SOCs :- DM355 and DM6446 >>> >>> These patches add support for VPFE (Video Processing Front End) based >>> video capture on D

Re: [PATCH 0/9] ARM: DaVinci: Video: DM355/DM6446 VPFE Capture driver

2009-06-03 Thread Koen Kooi
On 03-06-09 19:34, Kevin Hilman wrote: Koen Kooi writes: On 02-06-09 02:19, Kevin Hilman wrote: m-kariche...@ti.com writes: From: Muralidharan Karicheri VPFE Capture driver for DaVinci Media SOCs :- DM355 and DM6446 These patches add support for VPFE (Video Processing Front End) based vid

Re: [PATCH 0/9] ARM: DaVinci: Video: DM355/DM6446 VPFE Capture driver

2009-06-10 Thread Ottavio Campana
Ottavio Campana wrote: Kevin Hilman wrote: FYI I've added this series to a staging branch of DaVinci git after some minor compile updates for the new kernel. See branch 'staging/vpfe'. cool. I think I'll try it in a few days. I tried it today. It seems not to work, let me explain what I

Re: [PATCH 0/9] ARM: DaVinci: Video: DM355/DM6446 VPFE Capture driver

2009-06-11 Thread Ottavio Campana
Ottavio Campana wrote: Ottavio Campana wrote: Kevin Hilman wrote: FYI I've added this series to a staging branch of DaVinci git after some minor compile updates for the new kernel. See branch 'staging/vpfe'. cool. I think I'll try it in a few days. I tried it today. It seems not to wor

Re: [PATCH 0/9] ARM: DaVinci: Video: DM355/DM6446 VPFE Capture driver

2009-06-11 Thread David Brownell
On Thursday 11 June 2009, Ottavio Campana wrote: > * what must the value of I2C_DRIVERID_TVP5150 be? probably just remove it; most of those I2C_DRIVERID values are useless so they've slowly been getting removed. ___ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing l

RE: [PATCH 0/9] ARM: DaVinci: Video: DM355/DM6446 VPFE Capture driver

2009-06-16 Thread Karicheri, Muralidharan
>Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 12:31 PM >To: Kevin Hilman >Cc: Karicheri, Muralidharan; davinci-linux-open- >sou...@linux.davincidsp.com; Muralidharan Karicheri >Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] ARM: DaVinci: Video: DM355/DM6446 VPFE Capture >driver > >Ottavio Campana wrote: >> Kevin

RE: [PATCH 0/9] ARM: DaVinci: Video: DM355/DM6446 VPFE Capture driver

2009-06-16 Thread Karicheri, Muralidharan
age- >From: Ottavio Campana [mailto:ottavio.camp...@dei.unipd.it] >Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 4:46 AM >To: Kevin Hilman >Cc: davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com; Muralidharan Karicheri; >Karicheri, Muralidharan >Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] ARM: DaVinci: Video: DM355/DM6446

[PATCH 0/9] This patch series ports VPBE drivers from 2.6.10 tree.

2009-06-24 Thread caglarakyuz
From: Yusuf Caglar Akyuz IMPORTANT: These drivers by no means for upstream inclusion. I'm posting these just in case somebody wants to use them. This patch series forward port VPBE drivers from 2.6.10 tree into current DaVinci tree. These drivers are sitting locally from 2.6.27 version in my

[PATCH 0/9] ARM: DaVinci: ASoC: Adds Audio support for TI DM646X

2009-03-16 Thread Naresh Medisetty
Adds Audio support for TI DM646X EVM platform Signed-off-by: Naresh Medisetty --- This patch set adds audio support for DM646x This series is dependant on the following 2 patches submitted to the DaVinci git: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: DaVinci: EDMA: Move queue to tc mapping to dm.c [PATCH 2/2] ARM: DaVi

Re: [PATCH 0/9] This patch series ports VPBE drivers from 2.6.10 tree.

2009-06-25 Thread Yusuf Caglar AKYUZ
Karicheri, Muralidharan wrote: > Caglar, > > Is this based on LSP 1.20/1.30? > Yes. Thanks, Caglar ___ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-op

RE: [PATCH 0/9] This patch series ports VPBE drivers from 2.6.10 tree.

2009-06-25 Thread Karicheri, Muralidharan
inux-open-source-boun...@linux.davincidsp.com] On Behalf >Of caglarak...@gmail.com >Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 6:17 PM >To: davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com >Subject: [PATCH 0/9] This patch series ports VPBE drivers from 2.6.10 tree. > >From: Yusuf Caglar Akyuz >

RE: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 0/9] ARM: DaVinci: ASoC: Adds Audio support for TI DM646X

2009-03-18 Thread Medisetty, Naresh
Mark, Thanks for the review. I will re-submit the series by taking care of your comments. > -Original Message- > From: naresh [mailto:x0090...@ti.com] > Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 5:50 PM > To: 'nar...@ti.com' > Subject: > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 08:00:54AM -0400, Naresh Me