On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 10:53:53AM -0700, Mark A. Greer wrote:
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 09:14:13PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Mark A. Greer wrote:
static struct davinci_soc_info davinci_soc_info_dm355 = {
.io_desc= dm355_io_desc,
.io_desc_num=
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 01:43:41PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Tuesday 31 March 2009, Mark A. Greer wrote:
The serial infrastructure is pretty limited WRT this (I have same issue
on da830 evm--I only want to use uart2).
Couldn't you add some kind of ignore this one flag to that
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 08:55:41 -0700
Mark A. Greer mgr...@mvista.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 01:43:41PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Tuesday 31 March 2009, Mark A. Greer wrote:
The serial infrastructure is pretty limited WRT this (I have same
issue on da830 evm--I only want to use
Mark A. Greer wrote:
Currently, there is one set of platform_device and platform_data
structures for all DaVinci SoCs. The differences in the data
between the various SoCs is handled by davinci_serial_init()
by checking the SoC type. However, as new SoCs appear, this
routine will become more
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 12:55:36PM -0500, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 08:55:41 -0700
Mark A. Greer mgr...@mvista.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 01:43:41PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Tuesday 31 March 2009, Mark A. Greer wrote:
The serial infrastructure is pretty
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 09:14:13PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Mark A. Greer wrote:
static struct davinci_soc_info davinci_soc_info_dm355 = {
.io_desc= dm355_io_desc,
.io_desc_num= ARRAY_SIZE(dm355_io_desc),
@@ -654,6 +694,7 @@ static struct
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 10:42:09 -0700
Mark A. Greer mgr...@mvista.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 12:55:36PM -0500, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 08:55:41 -0700
Mark A. Greer mgr...@mvista.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 01:43:41PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On
On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 01:13:46AM -0400, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 22:04:46 -0700
Kevin Hilman khil...@deeprootsystems.com wrote:
Hugo Villeneuve h...@hugovil.com writes:
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:31:13 -0700
Kevin Hilman khil...@deeprootsystems.com wrote:
David
On Wednesday 01 April 2009, Mark A. Greer wrote:
The real problem seems to be the way that the 8250 driver assigns its
device numbers. If you disagree with that methodology, then fix the 8250
driver. Don't use some ugly hacks to avoid the real problem.
That's what David has already
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 02:32:52PM -0500, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:14:28 -0700
Mark A. Greer mgr...@mvista.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 11:33:58PM -0400, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 19:05:13 -0700
Hi Mark,
In doing so, it seems you are
On Tuesday 31 March 2009, Mark A. Greer wrote:
The serial infrastructure is pretty limited WRT this (I have same issue
on da830 evm--I only want to use uart2).
Couldn't you add some kind of ignore this one flag to that
infrastructure, and just have DaVinci use it?
This issue is hardly new to
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 01:43:41PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Tuesday 31 March 2009, Mark A. Greer wrote:
The serial infrastructure is pretty limited WRT this (I have same issue
on da830 evm--I only want to use uart2).
Couldn't you add some kind of ignore this one flag to that
On Tuesday 31 March 2009, Mark A. Greer wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 01:43:41PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Tuesday 31 March 2009, Mark A. Greer wrote:
The serial infrastructure is pretty limited WRT this (I have same issue
on da830 evm--I only want to use uart2).
Couldn't you
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 03:32:33PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Tuesday 31 March 2009, Mark A. Greer wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 01:43:41PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Tuesday 31 March 2009, Mark A. Greer wrote:
The serial infrastructure is pretty limited WRT this (I have same
David Brownell davi...@pacbell.net writes:
On Tuesday 31 March 2009, Mark A. Greer wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 01:43:41PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Tuesday 31 March 2009, Mark A. Greer wrote:
The serial infrastructure is pretty limited WRT this (I have same issue
on da830
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:31:13 -0700
Kevin Hilman khil...@deeprootsystems.com wrote:
David Brownell davi...@pacbell.net writes:
On Tuesday 31 March 2009, Mark A. Greer wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 01:43:41PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Tuesday 31 March 2009, Mark A. Greer wrote:
Hugo Villeneuve h...@hugovil.com writes:
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:31:13 -0700
Kevin Hilman khil...@deeprootsystems.com wrote:
David Brownell davi...@pacbell.net writes:
On Tuesday 31 March 2009, Mark A. Greer wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 01:43:41PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 22:04:46 -0700
Kevin Hilman khil...@deeprootsystems.com wrote:
Hugo Villeneuve h...@hugovil.com writes:
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:31:13 -0700
Kevin Hilman khil...@deeprootsystems.com wrote:
David Brownell davi...@pacbell.net writes:
On Tuesday 31 March 2009, Mark
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 11:33:58PM -0400, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 19:05:13 -0700
Mark A. Greer mgr...@mvista.com wrote:
From: Mark A. Greer mgr...@mvista.com
Currently, there is one set of platform_device and platform_data
structures for all DaVinci SoCs. The
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 09:08:19PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
On Saturday 28 March 2009, Mark A. Greer wrote:
*info)
static int __init davinci_init(void)
{
- return platform_device_register(serial_device);
+ return
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:14:28 -0700
Mark A. Greer mgr...@mvista.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 11:33:58PM -0400, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 19:05:13 -0700
Mark A. Greer mgr...@mvista.com wrote:
From: Mark A. Greer mgr...@mvista.com
Currently, there is one set
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 02:32:52PM -0500, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:14:28 -0700
Mark A. Greer mgr...@mvista.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 11:33:58PM -0400, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 19:05:13 -0700
Mark A. Greer mgr...@mvista.com wrote:
From: Mark A. Greer mgr...@mvista.com
Currently, there is one set of platform_device and platform_data
structures for all DaVinci SoCs. The differences in the data
between the various SoCs is handled by davinci_serial_init()
by checking the SoC type. However, as new SoCs appear, this
routine
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 19:05:13 -0700
Mark A. Greer mgr...@mvista.com wrote:
From: Mark A. Greer mgr...@mvista.com
Currently, there is one set of platform_device and platform_data
structures for all DaVinci SoCs. The differences in the data
between the various SoCs is handled by
24 matches
Mail list logo
