Diego Dompe wrote:
> Hi Caglar,
>
Hi,
> Thanks for your time and effort on this one!
>
>> Due to the changes in header file locations lately in arm tree, all
>> machine
[...]
>> After all these dplinkk module builds, but it is not working!!!
>> However, I have
>> another issue which might a
Hi Caglar,
Thanks for your time and effort on this one!
Due to the changes in header file locations lately in arm tree, all
machine
specific includes have to be changed in source files and build
scripts must be
modified to accomodate new header locations. Some changes also
needed for new
k
Diego Dompe wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi,
I also want to run demo software on git kernel, and started building components
after Diego's post. Here are my results...
> Highlevel flow:
> - Need to modify the dsplink release to compile against your kernel
Due to the changes in header file locations latel
Hi,
Highlevel flow:
- Need to modify the dsplink release to compile against your kernel
- Need to modify cmemk to compile against your kernel
When you have dsplink and cmemk, you can basically run the codec
servers and combos.
We have done this on the past and the issues I can remember are:
Hi,
The DVSDK v1.30 available from TI is based on the MontaVista Linux 2.6.10 Linux
Support Package.
In these weeks I made some effort to port the git kernel 2.6.25 to my
DM6446-based board.
Now, does anybody know how to make the DVSDK v1.30 working along with the git
kernel 2.6.25?
Also a high