Hi Philby,
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 05:11:33, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> From: Philby John
>
> Come out of i2c time out condition by following the
> bus recovery procedure outlined in the i2c protocol v3 spec.
> The kernel must be robust enough to gracefully recover
> from i2c bus failure without havin
"Nori, Sekhar" writes:
> Hi Philby,
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 05:11:33, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> From: Philby John
>>
>> Come out of i2c time out condition by following the
>> bus recovery procedure outlined in the i2c protocol v3 spec.
>> The kernel must be robust enough to gracefully recover
>
Hello Sekhar,
My apologies for the late mail. Had trouble with our mail server and I
seem to have lost mails. Pulling this thread from the list. Comments
inline...
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
> Hi Philby,
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 05:11:33, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> From
Hi Philby,
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 19:23:43, Philby John wrote:
> Hello Sekhar,
>
[...]
> >> +/* Generate a pulse on the i2c clock pin. */
> >> +static void generic_i2c_clock_pulse(unsigned int scl_pin)
> >> +{
> >> + u16 i;
> >> +
> >> + if (scl_pin) {
> >> + /* Send high an
Hello Sekhar,
On 02/08/2010 04:05 PM, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
+static void generic_i2c_clock_pulse(unsigned int scl_pin)
+{
+ u16 i;
+
+ if (scl_pin) {
+ /* Send high and low on the SCL line */
+ for (i = 0; i< 9; i++) {
+ gpio_set_value(scl_pin,
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 20:43:27, Philby John wrote:
> Hello Sekhar,
>
> On 02/08/2010 04:05 PM, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
> +static void generic_i2c_clock_pulse(unsigned int scl_pin)
> +{
> + u16 i;
> +
> + if (scl_pin) {
> + /* Send high and low on the
On 02/08/2010 09:33 PM, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 20:43:27, Philby John wrote:
Hello Sekhar,
On 02/08/2010 04:05 PM, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
+static void generic_i2c_clock_pulse(unsigned int scl_pin)
+{
+ u16 i;
+
+ if (scl_pin) {
+ /* Send high and low on the
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 15:45:15, Philby John wrote:
> On 02/08/2010 09:33 PM, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 20:43:27, Philby John wrote:
> >> Hello Sekhar,
> >>
> >> On 02/08/2010 04:05 PM, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
> >> +static void generic_i2c_clock_pulse(unsigned int scl_pin)
>
> > Right. I was also hoping to rid of cpu_is_xxx usage. The only other way
> > I could think of is to add pinmux index into i2c platform data struct.
> > What do you think is the best approach?
> >
>
> I think passing pinmux index through platform data is fair.
>
> Thanks,
> Sekhar
I recently w
On 03/05/2010 08:50 PM, Griffis, Brad wrote:
Right. I was also hoping to rid of cpu_is_xxx usage. The only other way
I could think of is to add pinmux index into i2c platform data struct.
What do you think is the best approach?
I think passing pinmux index through platform data is fair.
Thank
On 02/08/2010 04:05 PM, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
Hi Philby,
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 19:23:43, Philby John wrote:
Hello Sekhar,
[...]
+/* Generate a pulse on the i2c clock pin. */
+static void generic_i2c_clock_pulse(unsigned int scl_pin)
+{
+ u16 i;
+
+ if (scl_pin) {
+ /* S
> -Original Message-
> From: Philby John [mailto:pj...@mvista.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 7:37 AM
> To: Griffis, Brad
> Cc: Nori, Sekhar; davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com; linux-
> i...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] i2c: davinci: bus
Philby John writes:
> On 02/08/2010 04:05 PM, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
>> Hi Philby,
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 19:23:43, Philby John wrote:
>>> Hello Sekhar,
>>>
>>
>> [...]
>>
> +/* Generate a pulse on the i2c clock pin. */
> +static void generic_i2c_clock_pulse(unsigned int scl_pin)
On 03/17/2010 02:20 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Philby John writes:
On 02/08/2010 04:05 PM, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
Hi Philby,
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 19:23:43, Philby John wrote:
Hello Sekhar,
[...]
+/* Generate a pulse on the i2c clock pin. */
+static void generic_i2c_clock_pulse(unsigned in
Hi Philby,
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 16:58:44, Philby John wrote:
> On 03/17/2010 02:20 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> > Philby John writes:
> >
> >> On 02/08/2010 04:05 PM, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
> >>> Hi Philby,
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 19:23:43, Philby John wrote:
> Hello Sekhar,
>
On 03/17/2010 06:48 PM, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
Hi Philby,
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 16:58:44, Philby John wrote:
On 03/17/2010 02:20 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Philby John writes:
On 02/08/2010 04:05 PM, Nori, Sekhar wrote:
Hi Philby,
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 19:23:43, Philby John wrote:
Hello S
Hi Philby,
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 1:41 AM, Kevin Hilman
wrote:
> From: Philby John
>
> Come out of i2c time out condition by following the
> bus recovery procedure outlined in the i2c protocol v3 spec.
> The kernel must be robust enough to gracefully recover
> from i2c bus failure without havin
Hello Pablo,
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 16:23 +0200, Pablo Bitton wrote:
> Hi Philby,
> i2c_davinci_wait_bus_not_busy(struct davinci_i2c_dev *dev,
> char allow_sleep)
> {
>unsigned long timeout;
> + static u1
18 matches
Mail list logo
