Hello.
Kevin Hilman wrote:
Sergei Shtylyov sshtyl...@ru.mvista.com writes:
[snip]
There is one thing I found difficult to share between OMAP-L1x and
DaVinci variants. That is the RAM is map to different physical address.
For DaVinci Makefile.boot we have
zreladdr-y := 0x80008000
Hello.
David Brownell wrote:
If you want to have MUSB support in kernel you can forget your dream
of single kernel image. :-)
That's quite a pursuasive argument.
Yet I haven't seen any proof to it. There's no fundamental
reason it should be so. Details are missing. :)
Sergei Shtylyov sshtyl...@ru.mvista.com writes:
[snip]
There is one thing I found difficult to share between OMAP-L1x and
DaVinci variants. That is the RAM is map to different physical address.
For DaVinci Makefile.boot we have
zreladdr-y := 0x80008000
params_phys-y := 0x8100
On Tuesday 20 January 2009, Kevin Hilman wrote:
If you want to have MUSB support in kernel you can forget your dream
of single kernel image. :-)
That's quite a pursuasive argument.
Yet I haven't seen any proof to it. There's no fundamental
reason it should be so. Details are missing.
