HI Cynthia
On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 at 17:43, Cynthia Revström via db-wg wrote:
>
> Hi db-wg,
>
> I just want to start out by saying that I support efforts to try to better
> understand and document this.
> What I don't (currently) support is changing DB policy (policy in the form of
> RIPE documents
I suggest that this is not just a localized decision of the db-wg, but
has global implications. You are discussing a field whose value is
interpreted both directly from WHOIS and RDAP, and less directly from
delegated files in the registry system across all the RIR. Your
consumers are my consumers,
Hi,
I strongly support what George has written.
On Tue, 7 Mar 2023 at 14:29, George Michaelson via db-wg wrote:
[...]
> I don't necessarily disagree with you about the risks here, but I
> suggest that the decision to deprecate or alter behavior with this
> field is not something which a single
Hi George
Thanks for your comments. Of course global context is important in
these situations and I appreciate you raising this issue.
It says in the file:
https://ftp.ripe.net/pub/stats/ripencc/RIR-Statistics-Exchange-Format.txt
3.3 Record format:
...
cc= ISO 3166 2-letter count
Hi Leo
On Tue, 7 Mar 2023 at 23:51, Leo Vegoda wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I strongly support what George has written.
>
> On Tue, 7 Mar 2023 at 14:29, George Michaelson via db-wg
> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > I don't necessarily disagree with you about the risks here, but I
> > suggest that the decision to
Hi Denis,
On Tue, 7 Mar 2023 at 16:20, denis walker wrote:
> > On Tue, 7 Mar 2023 at 14:29, George Michaelson via db-wg
> > wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > I don't necessarily disagree with you about the risks here, but I
> > > suggest that the decision to deprecate or alter behavior with this
>
> I suggest that this is not just a localized decision of the db-wg, but
> has global implications.
+1, and this aside from the idea having other fatal flaws, as discussed
here before.
randy
--
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your
subscription options
Hi Leo
>From my perspective as an analyst it's getting interesting now... Yes
we can consider it as a complex problem needing a complex
solution...but are either really complex? Maybe it is the environment
that is complex and not this specific problem or solution.
On Wed, 8 Mar 2023 at 01:29, Leo
Hi Randy
On Wed, 8 Mar 2023 at 03:11, Randy Bush wrote:
>
> > I suggest that this is not just a localized decision of the db-wg, but
> > has global implications.
>
> +1, and this aside from the idea having other fatal flaws, as discussed
> here before.
Can you please be a little more specific? W
