On Mon, 2004-05-03 at 05:45, Matthew O. Persico wrote:
On Sat, 1 May 2004 18:53:30 +0100, Tim Bunce typed:
=head2 Example Implementation via DBI Subclass
Another way to think about the behaviour of more_results() is to
imagine a DBI subclass that did something like this:
sub prepare
On Sat, 2004-05-01 at 19:53, Tim Bunce wrote:
Here's an updated version of what I'm thinking of with respect
to $sth-more_results (many thanks for the valuable feedback).
finish: $sth-finish will discard all pending result sets.
($sth-more_results automatically discards any unfetched
rows
Hi Paul,
just compiled Devel-Cover-0.43 with BC++ 5.5, perl 5.6.1, WinNT 4.0 -
looks good:
Using C:/temp/Devel-Cover-0.43/blib
t\aaliasok
t\aalias1...ok
t\abranch_return_subok
t\acond_and.ok
t\acond_branch..ok
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 10:49:07AM +0200, Steffen Goeldner wrote:
Hi Paul,
just compiled Devel-Cover-0.43 with BC++ 5.5, perl 5.6.1, WinNT 4.0 -
looks good:
Good. And before I even got around to replying to your post!
Using C:/temp/Devel-Cover-0.43/blib
t\aaliasok
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 08:28:00AM +0200, Michael Peppler wrote:
I think Tim is just providing a sample implementation, not required
behavior.
Yes.
Certainly DBD::Sybase will continue to behave the way it does now, with
the possible exception of conforming to a few additional rules if they
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 10:25:50AM +0200, Michael Peppler wrote:
On Sat, 2004-05-01 at 19:53, Tim Bunce wrote:
Here's an updated version of what I'm thinking of with respect
to $sth-more_results (many thanks for the valuable feedback).
finish: $sth-finish will discard all pending result
