Re: Named bind params with DBD::Proxy

2004-10-22 Thread Henri Asseily
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, Tim Bunce wrote: > On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 09:00:23AM -0700, Tim Howell wrote: > > 1. Better support for dead connections. In our setup we have > > applications running with Apache::DBI on linux that need to connect to a > > ProxyServer running on Win2K. Currently, if the

Re: Named bind params with DBD::Proxy

2004-10-22 Thread Tim Bunce
On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 09:00:23AM -0700, Tim Howell wrote: > > Just a quick note to let everyone know that I haven't dropped off the > face of the planet and am, indeed working on DBD::Proxy. I got slammed > by a couple of projects on my return from OSCON and the programming side > of my job was

Re: Named bind params with DBD::Proxy

2004-10-22 Thread Tim Bunce
On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 05:00:56PM -0500, Scott T. Hildreth wrote: > Tim, > Are you still maintaining DBD::Proxy? Yes, with a loose definition of the word "maintaining". > Have you had a request for supporting named parameters? Tim Howell [CC'd] volunteered but not much has happened. I coul

Re: Named bind params with DBD::Proxy

2004-10-22 Thread Scott T. Hildreth
Tim, Are you still maintaining DBD::Proxy? Have you had a request for supporting named parameters? STH On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 16:55, Scott T. Hildreth wrote: > I was going bring this up myself. I had this problem the other day. > To get it working I changed the