Re: DBI 1.15 - regressed DBD::ADO driver?

2001-04-04 Thread Tim Bunce
ay, April 04, 2001 6:17 PM > > To: Tim Bunce; Jonathan Leffler; dbi-users > > Subject: Re: DBI 1.15 - regressed DBD::ADO driver? > > > > > > > > I'd be very happy for DBD::ADO to be released to CPAN (DBI::Shell and > > the proxy modules as well). That w

Re: DBI 1.15 - regressed DBD::ADO driver?

2001-04-04 Thread Simon Oliver
Tim, if these pure-perl modules are bundled with the DBI package and DBI is (re)installed over a newer version of say DBD::ADO then will that newer version be overwritten by CPAN or PPM? If so then it is my preference that the individual modules be kept seperate unless DBI depends on those mo

Re: DBI 1.15 - regressed DBD::ADO driver?

2001-04-04 Thread Steven N. Hirsch
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Thomas A. Lowery wrote: > I've changed my version of DBD::ADO to 2.0, instead of continuing the > 1.X line. This may help in future releases. > > > > Why did the version regress? Let's take a look at the code for > > > blib/DBD/ADO.pm in DBI 1.15 and 1.14: > > Tim and I we

RE: DBI 1.15 - regressed DBD::ADO driver?

2001-04-04 Thread Neil Lunn
> -Original Message- > From: Tim Bunce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 6:17 PM > To: Tim Bunce; Jonathan Leffler; dbi-users > Subject: Re: DBI 1.15 - regressed DBD::ADO driver? > > > > I'd be very happy for DBD::ADO to be

Re: DBI 1.15 - regressed DBD::ADO driver?

2001-04-04 Thread Tim Bunce
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 12:12:57AM -0400, Thomas A. Lowery wrote: > I've changed my version of DBD::ADO to 2.0, instead of continuing the > 1.X line. This may help in future releases. > > > > Why did the version regress? Let's take a look at the code for > > > blib/DBD/ADO.pm in DBI 1.15 and 1.

Re: DBI 1.15 - regressed DBD::ADO driver?

2001-04-03 Thread Jonathan Leffler
"Thomas A. Lowery" wrote: > I've changed my version of DBD::ADO to 2.0, instead of continuing the > 1.X line. This may help in future releases. > > > > Why did the version regress? Let's take a look at the code for > > > blib/DBD/ADO.pm in DBI 1.15 and 1.14: > > Tim and I we're attempting to ma

Re: DBI 1.15 - regressed DBD::ADO driver?

2001-04-03 Thread Thomas A . Lowery
I've changed my version of DBD::ADO to 2.0, instead of continuing the 1.X line. This may help in future releases. > > Why did the version regress? Let's take a look at the code for > > blib/DBD/ADO.pm in DBI 1.15 and 1.14: Tim and I we're attempting to maintain DBD::ADO is two different CVS l

Re: DBI 1.15 - regressed DBD::ADO driver?

2001-04-03 Thread Tim Bunce
That was simply an error on my part. Sorry. Tom, please send me the latest DBD::ADO (or else say that the one on CPAN is the latest you want included in the DBI). Tim. On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 10:21:11AM -0700, Jonathan Leffler wrote: > Hi, > > I just upgraded from DBI 1.14 to 1.15. After the

DBI 1.15 - regressed DBD::ADO driver?

2001-04-02 Thread Jonathan Leffler
Hi, I just upgraded from DBI 1.14 to 1.15. After the install completed, I ran a check on what else needed to be upgraded, the CPAN module reports that DBD::ADO module needs to be upgraded from the current 0.419 to version 1.17 as found in DBI 1.14. Why did the version regress? Let's take a loo