On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 11:32:18PM +0200, Peter Rabbitson wrote:
> Given the discussion generated way more interest than I anticipated, at
> this point I am pausing all activity ( both code and administrative
> changes ), until at least the 8th of October. I want to give ample time
> for all int
I’ve been watching this conversation unfold from the sidelines, and as an
extremely infrequent user of DBIC (but highly interested Perl community member
and sometimes Open Source community manager), I haven’t felt the need to
participate before now — but I’m afraid there’s something that’s being
Having just read the C4 spec, I generally find its proposals reasonable.
However, section 2.5 "Branches and Releases" seems too simplistic and I would
recommend against adopting that part as is.
In particular, its third point:
"To make a stable release a Maintainer shall tag the repository. S
On 2016-10-06 2:18 AM, Aaron Trevena wrote:
One quick thing to mention, is that SQL and Relational Databases have
moved forward considerably since we were using Class::DBI. I'm now
working on a project using latest Postgres features, and I've been
literally astonished at some of the new stuff th
On 2016-10-06 8:43 AM, Matt S Trout wrote:
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 08:17:49PM -0700, Darren Duncan wrote:
That would be good, also in light with how that sentence continues:
"I suspect what we need to try and achieve is to get DBIC a bit more
decentralised - have it be a specific framework buil
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 12:24:59PM +0200, Hartmaier Alexander wrote:
> A big part was also his and mst's plan to use Data::Query in DBIx::Class
> which they seen to have abandoned without communicating it.
Not so much abandoned as I basically got locked out as well and entirely
lost motivation to
Woops, didn't mean to refer to the old version of C4. I don't know
the differences between C4.1 and C4.2 are, but I suspect the newer one
is probably better. Corrected link is
https://rfc.zeromq.org/spec:42/C4/.
On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 09:57:38AM -0700, fREW Schmidt wrote:
> Hello friends,
>
>
Hello friends,
TL;DR:
* Given that we want stability and community involvment, maybe we
should try C4.1 which optimizes for these.
* I really strongly think that all members of (AT LEAST) the core
group need to act like adults when conversing with other people,
especially realizing tha
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 08:17:49PM -0700, Darren Duncan wrote:
> That would be good, also in light with how that sentence continues:
>
> "I suspect what we need to try and achieve is to get DBIC a bit more
> decentralised - have it be a specific framework build atop a
> more-like-Plack-for-DB-stuf
Sorry for replying that late but I was away for two month and didn't
find the right words in the short peroids of time I had.
castaway let me quote her answer in the mail conversation between David
Golden and the current PAUSE maintainers of DBIC that preceded this one:
Having read the last fe
I've not got much to add that hasn't already said, except that my
current priority is stability and performance over feature improvements.
Other than that, I would like to publicly thank Ribasushi for the huge
amount of effort and dedication he has put into the project. Not
just the code commits,
This pretty much matches my situation and opinion.
Thanks Riba for the great work so far.
+1 for Matt's plan.
Cheers,
--
Wallace Reis
Em 5 de out de 2016 08:55, "Nigel Metheringham" escreveu:
Background: I have been a happy DBIx::Class user from the early days. I
have some code contribution
On 4 October 2016 at 21:45, Aaron Crane wrote:
> Matt S Trout wrote:
>> Since people seem to be unsure as to what the alternative to riba's project
>> freeze would actually be, let me provide something a little more concrete.
>>
>> This is intended as a basis for discussion rather than a complete
On Tue, 04 Oct 2016 19:20:51 +0100, Peter Mottram wrote:
On 04/10/16 19:08, Matt S Trout wrote:
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 12:49:49PM -0400, Ashley Pond V wrote:
I did say MST RFC:MUST be respected. :P This is only here because of
you. I was an early CDBI user and was there for the fights over i
14 matches
Mail list logo
