Just tried this for myself. A lot of warnings..
I guess the cleaned up statements are in the patches you'll send me
today? ;)
I agree we should keep the __attribute__ thing in the source. It does
not cost us anything, and it helps preventing bugs. Sounds like free
lunch to me! :)
Ilja
Hi,
Roel Rozendaal - ICS wrote:
taking this to the development:
just checked rfc 3501; @ APPEND:
(..)
If a date-time is specified, the internal date SHOULD be set in
the resulting message; otherwise, the internal date of the
resulting message is set to the current date and time by default.
If you have CVS updated to your latest working tree I'll patch against it in a
few hours. This moment I have to finish up a project before daybreak.
Aaron
Ilja Booij [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Just tried this for myself. A lot of warnings..
I guess the cleaned up statements are in the patches
Here it goes... I'll also post to SourceForge.
Aaron
Ilja Booij [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
HEAD is completely updated. I'm having some trouble updating
dbmail_2_0_branch, due to conflicts when applying patches. I guess I'll
wait with updating that branch. Or, like somebody suggested a while
I've applied the patch (have not updated CVS yet).
I ran into the following problem:
When delivering a message, all message go into the mailbox of user_idnr
0 (that is: zero).
The problem seems to be, that the user_idnrs to deliver the messages to
are kept in delivery-userids (in a list),
Posted to SourceForge. A little patch to pipe.c and header.c, which fixes a
buffer boundary issue in the newline/rfc counting, the forgotten delivery
useridnr loop and a missing rfcsize argument to sort_and_deliver.
It's also a proper forwards patch now :-P
Aaron
Aaron Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 04:38, Paul J Stevens wrote:
Chris Nolan wrote:
Hi all!
I'm looking to migrate the dodgy setup from hell to DBMail. Here's the
problem:
* The current setup is:
Postfix 1.x + UW-IMAP (ugh...) + SASL + PWCheck
I want to move this across to:
backport to woody of dbmail-1.2.3 has just been uploaded
to debian.nfgd.net
Louis van Belle wrote:
Is there a change the 1.2.3 dbmail version
Wil be packaged for debian woody (stable)
___
Dbmail mailing list
Dbmail@dbmail.org
Chris Nolan wrote:
And SMTP AUTH with users in dbmail only, will work if you use pam-mysql.
Of course if 2.0 will do ldap that will work even better performance wise.
Admittedly, I want to get as far away from SASL as I can. I've used
Cyrus stuff before and although it's quite good,
Roel Rozendaal - ICS wrote:
cool :-) if you find it working, would you consider it posting to the
list? We might include it as a utility as long as the problem isn't
solved.
regards roel
Op 26-feb-04 om 18:33 heeft Ronny Walter het volgende geschreven:
Hello,
of course, i can post it to
Roel,
I noticed that some of the original patch I sent you a while ago for
memory leaks missed these few db_free_result's I have attached the patch
for current cvs. Thanks. I am still trying to track down the issue with
the list.c node_add it still seems that there is an instance in the
codebase
Why don't you use pop before smtp ?
It is inbuilt in dbmail and preffered by the users cause they do not have to
type/remember passwords.
BIVOL
- Original Message -
From: Chris Nolan
To: dbmail@dbmail.org
Sent: Sunday, February 29, 2004 12:05 PM
Subject: [Dbmail] Postfix 2.0 + DBMail +
12 matches
Mail list logo
