On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 01:42 +0300, Alexander Benaguev wrote:
> hi, community!
>
> right now i'v got this from the postmater:
> -
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Sieve script run error
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> X-DBMail-PhysMessage-ID: 409080
Aaron Stone wrote:
> I am not sure if the problem is with the script or the message. Please
> post the script so that we can see if the error is in the script. If it
> is, I'll try to improve the error reporting by adding context about
> where the bad address was found in the script.
but dbmail-sie
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006, Alexander Benaguev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Aaron Stone wrote:
>> I am not sure if the problem is with the script or the message. Please
>> post the script so that we can see if the error is in the script. If it
>> is, I'll try to improve the error reporting by adding cont
I'm in a situation where a particular users mail was deleted from dbmail
(not just "status" deleted, but the entire account, mailboxes,
messages, etc were removed). Now I need to recover these from a tape
backup and put the mail back in the users (recreated) account.
I'm having the entire dbmail
Bernard Johnson wrote:
> It seems that just dumping the database records for this user and then
> trying to insert them to the live database will run into problems with
> the mailbox ids and such not matching.
correct.
>
> I'm thinking about using a tool like imapsync to synchronize the
> mess
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 08:55 +0100, Paul J Stevens wrote:
>
> Bernard Johnson wrote:
>
> > I'm thinking about using a tool like imapsync to synchronize the
> > messages from the old database to disk, then from disk to the new database.
>
> Sounds like a sane strategy to me.
Please write up a page
Wasn't there a "user->mbox" script somewhere?
After which the mbox -> user import can be done.
guys
i did something wrong:
update dbmail_messages set status=2
now all messages just disapear!!!
what is the status to restore them all?
ok i put it back to status=1
ufa!
- Original Message -
From: Jorge Bastos
To: DBMail mailinglist
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 9:30 AM
Subject: HELP!!
guys
i did something wrong:
update dbmail_messages set status=2
now all messages just disapear!!!
what is th
On 29-nov-2006, at 9:50, Marc Dirix wrote:
Wasn't there a "user->mbox" script somewhere?
After which the mbox -> user import can be done.
Or you could just use a regular emai client (thunderbird,
Mail.app etc.) to connect to the two imap servers
(production and restore) siimultaneously and
You messed up real good this time.
You just told dbmail that all messages are STATUS_DELETE.
This is *not* the query I sent you yesterday!
Only way out is setting all messages to SEEN (status=1) or NEW (status=0)
Or: recover from a backup.
And make sure you dont run dbmail-util while you're bu
Theory is, LMTP is much faster than dbmail-smtp but has anyone actually measured
this difference? I'm on a local machine so I can go either way.
Tom,
It's not just performance that should be taken into consideration.
LMTP is a must for people who use multiple MTA's talking to semi-remote
dbmail installations.
Tom Allison wrote:
> Theory is, LMTP is much faster than dbmail-smtp but has anyone actually
> measured this difference? I'm on
Can I configure dbmail to accept LMTP traffic on a unix socket instead of
TCP/IP?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can I configure dbmail to accept LMTP traffic on a unix socket instead of
TCP/IP?
[LMTP]
#
# Port to bind to.
#
PORT = 24
SOCKET = /var/run/dbmail-lmtpd.sock
Without the "PORT = SOMEINTEGERVALUE", dbmail will complain, it's just
required, has no meaning when SOCKET i
That's very cool!
On 11/29/2006, "Aleksander" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Can I configure dbmail to accept LMTP traffic on a unix socket instead of
>> TCP/IP?
>
>[LMTP]
>#
># Port to bind to.
>#
>PORT = 24
>SOCKET = /var/run/dbmail-lmtpd.sock
>
>
>Without the "PORT =
Sure:
[LMTP]
socket=/var/run/dbmail/dbmail-lmtpd.sock
bind=
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Can I configure dbmail to accept LMTP traffic on a unix socket instead of
> TCP/IP?
> ___
> DBmail mailing list
> DBmail@dbmail.org
> https://mailman.fastxs.nl/mail
Paul/Aaron,
The field here on headername with a varchar(100) should be text to prevent
something bigger?
Like the dbmail_headervalue that has a text type
CREATE TABLE dbmail_headername (
id BIGINT NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
headername VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL DEFAULT
Hi,
I'm struggling with porting an procmail script to sieve.
DATE=`date +%m%y`
:0
* ^From.*MAILER-DAEMON
bounced$DATE
The problem is in the $DATE part so every month a new mailbox is
created, has sieve a replacement for this?
Kind regards,
Marc
Jorge Bastos wrote:
> Paul/Aaron,
> The field here on headername with a varchar(100) should be text to
> prevent something bigger?
> Like the dbmail_headervalue that has a text type
>
> CREATE TABLE dbmail_headername (
> id BIGINT NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
> headername
Message-IDs?
I'll have to see if I can find one.
But sometimes the are insanely long.
Perhaps a bit spammy, but long just the same.
RFC2822 says you should plan on 78 but might encounter 998 character
length strings.
I don't know that I've ever seen a message-id wrap around.
On 11/29/2006, "Pa
The message id is not a header name, it's a value. Values can be
arbitrarily long. The 998 number is how many characters you can have
before a mandatory CRLF pair appears. The 999'th and beyond characters
between CRLF's are allowed to be dropped (though RFC 2822 says you should
be nice and try to h
libSieve does not implement the variables drafts at all yet, so
unfortunately dynamic mailbox names are not possible at this time.
Aaron
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006, Marc Dirix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi,
>
> I'm struggling with porting an procmail script to sieve.
>
> DATE=`date +%m%y`
> :0
> *
23 matches
Mail list logo
