A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=156
==
Reported By:xing
Assigned To:
The following bug has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=157
==
Reported By:OlegL
Assigned To:
We have a third confirmation on the authentication bug which is pretty
serious now that we know it's not an isolated incident with Thunderbird.
This got me thinking a bit how dbmail could improve on the pre-release
testing.
Speaking for myself, I don't like to test cvs since there are just to
Yes! This is a great idea. I agree with it all.
""[EMAIL PROTECTED]"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Right now for minor versions we have CVS, which I don't think have
> enough people testing on, and immediate release.
There are also CVS snapshots, which at least clear the hurdle for those
who don't like to manually check out packages. But it st
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=157
==
Reported By:OlegL
Assigned To:
==
Found the sigpipe bug I believe.
If the mysql connection disappears for some reason (idle timeout, or mysql
restart), the dbmail process should reconnect. It does so for normal queries,
but in the case of authentication the mysql connection is used for escaping the
login/password sequences wit
Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Found the sigpipe bug I believe.
>
> If the mysql connection disappears for some reason (idle timeout, or mysql
> restart), the dbmail process should reconnect. It does so for normal
> queries, but in the case of authentication the mysql connection is u
The following bug has been RESOLVED.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=157
==
Reported By:OlegL
Assigned To:
The following bug has been RESOLVED.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=155
==
Reported By:xing
Assigned To:
I've done the checkin already. Nothing major wrt searching so I don't really
expect any problems there. I've skipped optimizing _ic_sort, just because that
was less trivial to fix.
below link shows the gist of what I've done:
http://cvs.dbmail.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/dbmail/dbsearch.c.diff?r1=1
Aaron, I'm backing out the search optimization just to be sure.
Paul J Stevens wrote:
I've done the checkin already. Nothing major wrt searching so I don't
really expect any problems there. I've skipped optimizing _ic_sort, just
because that was less trivial to fix.
below link shows the gist
The following bug has been ASSIGNED.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=156
==
Reported By:xing
Assigned To:
Hi,
Paul, I can do a release right now if you're confident about the
fixes. shall I do this right now?
Ilja
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 11:20:56 +0100 (CET), [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The following bug has been ASSIGNED.
> ==
I'm all for releasing. My fixes should make dbmail *much* more robust in case of
dropped database connections, a problem which has plagued dbmail as long as I
can remember.
The only uncertainty on my part has to do with my implementation of
db_check_connection in pgsql/dbpgsql.c. It's pretty
So looking back on the past three releases, they're all about 1 - 1.5
months apart (2.0.0 -> 2.0.1 -> 2.0.2/3). That seems like a reasonable
release rate right now, given the number of things in 2.0 that could use
touching up or speeding up.
Not to get too far ahead of myself, I'm thinking that we
The following bug has been RESOLVED.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=142
==
Reported By:aaron
Assigned To:
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=122
==
Reported By:va1210
Assigned To:
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=149
==
Reported By:paul
Assigned To:
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=145
==
Reported By:bjohnson
Assigned T
> --
> aaron - 12-Jan-05 19:41 CET
> --
> What the issue here? I don't believe that the envelope sender is kept
> neither with lmtp nor with pipe/dbmail-smtp d
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=145
==
Reported By:bjohnson
Assigned T
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=145
==
Reported By:bjohnson
Assigned T
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=122
==
Reported By:va1210
Assigned To:
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=127
==
Reported By:sr
Assigned To:
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=148
==
Reported By:Dead2
Assigned To:
Jesse Norell wrote:
--
aaron - 12-Jan-05 19:41 CET
--
What the issue here? I don't believe that the envelope sender is kept
neither with lmtp nor with pipe/d
27 matches
Mail list logo
