On Wed, Jan 19, 2005, ""Aaron Stone"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2005, Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>> Aaron, please don't use the my_ namespace. I've only recently switched
>> over all the my_malloc, my_strdup, etc calls over to use dm_ instead.
>> my_ is bound to
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005, Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Aaron, please don't use the my_ namespace. I've only recently switched
> over all the my_malloc, my_strdup, etc calls over to use dm_ instead.
> my_ is bound to conflict with the mysql space.
Right, I'll change it. It's actually the
Aaron, please don't use the my_ namespace. I've only recently switched over all the my_malloc, my_strdup, etc
calls over to use dm_ instead. my_ is bound to conflict with the mysql space.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug.
===
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005, ""Johannes russek""
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> hey guys,
> how far are you with implementing the cached message headers?
Hasn't been started yet.
> is that feature avaible in the stable release?
It won't appear in DBMail 2.0 at all, but will be added into DBMail 2.1
devel
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=165
==
Reported By:va1210
Assigned To:
The following bug has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=165
==
Reported By:va1210
Assigned To:
hey guys,
how far are you with implementing the cached message headers?
is that feature avaible in the stable release?
i would be glad, if only writing of those is supported.
i actually don't need it for performance tuning of imap reading, but i need
it because i want to use dbmail as an email arch
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=152
==
Reported By:paul
Assigned To:
The following bug has been RESOLVED.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=153
==
Reported By:aaron
Assigned To:
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=164
==
Reported By:real10us
Assigned T
The following bug has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=164
==
Reported By:real10us
Assigned T
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005, Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Are you using "autoreconf -f -i" ?
>
Yeah, and I had it working once before using -f -i, but it's not now :-(
Aaron
Aaron,
Are you using "autoreconf -f -i" ?
--
aaron - 19-Jan-05 12:01 CET
--
I tried putting changing AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(dbmail, 2.0) to
AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(dbmai
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=131
==
Reported By:jnorell
Assigned To
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=161
==
Reported By:xing
Assigned To:
> THIS
>
> dbmail_users:
>
>15 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> dbmail_aliases:
>
>... [EMAIL PROTECTED]15
>... [EMAIL PROTECTED] 15
>
> OR THIS
>
> dbmail_aliases:
>
>... [EMAIL PROTECTED]15
>... [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> T
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=118
==
Reported By:seanc
Assigned To:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005, Ewald Geschwinde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> with this configuration added in the alias table
>
> alias
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> deliver_to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> it does also not work
> This is the trace I sent in the first mail If the user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> is not in db
with this configuration added in the alias table
alias
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
deliver_to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it does also not work
This is the trace I sent in the first mail If the user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
is not in dbmail he rejects the user and does not do a select in the
aliases table if there is one
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=149
==
Reported By:paul
Assigned To:
Originally you described [EMAIL PROTECTED] had deliver-to of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
but does it now
work, or are you still having a problem even with the configuration I just
suggested?
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005, Ewald Geschwinde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> Oh, now I get it. Sorry I was being dense about
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005, Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>>If and when you start working on this, please check out the
>>>check_dbmail_deliver.c code which will contain unit-test cases for all
>>>auth.h code.
>>
>> Have there been any changes to the auth functions in head? If I can
>> re
The following bug has been CLOSED
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=122
==
Reported By:va1210
Assigned To:
The following bug has been CLOSED
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=160
==
Reported By:sr
Assigned To:
The following bug has been RESOLVED.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=160
==
Reported By:sr
Assigned To:
> Oh, now I get it. Sorry I was being dense about your question. The answer
> is that DBMail 1.x *does not check the users table at all* when looking
> for
> delivery addresses.
>
> dbmail_users:
>
>15[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> dbmail_aliases:
>
>... [EMAIL PROTECTED] 15
>...
Aaron Stone wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005, Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
If and when you start working on this, please check out the
check_dbmail_deliver.c code which will contain unit-test cases for all
auth.h code.
Have there been any changes to the auth functions in head? If
The following bug has been RESOLVED.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=127
==
Reported By:sr
Assigned To:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005, Ewald Geschwinde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 20:46:17 -, Aaron Stone
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 18, 2005, Ewald Geschwinde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>> > I tested something with my dbmail.
>> >
>> > I have now deleted teh user [EMA
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005, Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> If and when you start working on this, please check out the
> check_dbmail_deliver.c code which will contain unit-test cases for all
> auth.h code.
Have there been any changes to the auth functions in head? If I can
rewrite ldap i
On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 20:46:17 -, Aaron Stone
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2005, Ewald Geschwinde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > I tested something with my dbmail.
> >
> > I have now deleted teh user [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > and only the aliases to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] exists like
Aaron,
If and when you start working on this, please check out the
check_dbmail_deliver.c code which will contain unit-test cases for all auth.h code.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following bug has been ASSIGNED.
==
http://ww
The following bug has been ASSIGNED.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=127
==
Reported By:sr
Assigned To:
The following bug has been RESOLVED.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=163
==
Reported By:paul
Assigned To:
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=163
==
Reported By:paul
Assigned To:
The following bug has been ASSIGNED.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=065
==
Reported By:ilja
Assigned To:
36 matches
Mail list logo
