The following bug has been ASSIGNED.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=230
==
Reported By:tmatsuo
Assigned To:
Christian G. Warden wrote:
> I'm attempting to build dbmail2-mysql 2.1.1 using the source package
> from Paul's repository. It fails to find check.h from the check
> package, which isn't listed in Build-Depends.
Comment out the WITH_CHECK line 13 in debian/rules. Unit-testing is for
development
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=220
==
Reported By:mavetju
Assigned To
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=231
==
Reported By:cwarden
Assigned To
No particular reason for the O1.
Thomas Mueller wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know Paul is on vacation - nevertheless maybe someone knows an answer.
>
> Pauls unstable packages are not installable on Sarge so I compiled new
> 2.0.4 packages from SVN. He used the moderate optimizer switch -O1
> instead of -
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=234
==
Reported By:mike
Assigned To:
Brandon,
why reinvent the wheel here? Either use imap where access is restricted
to your client, or build a client that links directly to libdbmail.
Please take not that 2.1 development is under way, and the tables will
change a bit here and there as we add new features or improve
performance. Im
Paul J Stevens wrote:
> Brandon,
>
> why reinvent the wheel here? Either use imap where access is restricted
> to your client, or build a client that links directly to libdbmail.
>
> Please take not that 2.1 development is under way, and the tables will
> change a bit here and there as we add new
The following bug has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=235
==
Reported By:Jetty
Assigned To:
Igor Stroh wrote:
>Paul J Stevens wrote:
>
>
>>Brandon,
>>
>>why reinvent the wheel here? Either use imap where access is restricted
>>to your client, or build a client that links directly to libdbmail.
>>
>>Please take not that 2.1 development is under way, and the tables will
>>change a bit he
PQServerVersion should be PQserverVersion also.
I've fixed both typos in SVN.
Thomas Mueller wrote:
> Aaron Stone wrote:
>
>>On Tue, Jul 26, 2005, Igor Stroh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>
>>>Thomas Mueller wrote:
>>>
dbpgsql.c: In function `db_connect':
dbpgsql.c:80: warning: implicit dec
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=231
==
Reported By:cwarden
Assigned To
Wow. Intense bug. *smacks self in head*
Aaron
On Mon, Aug 1, 2005, Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> PQServerVersion should be PQserverVersion also.
>
> I've fixed both typos in SVN.
>
> Thomas Mueller wrote:
>> Aaron Stone wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, Jul 26, 2005, Igor Stroh <[EMAIL PROTE
What utter nonesense blaming the protocol for bad front -end code. Fix your
code.
Mike
- Original Message -
From: "Igor Stroh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist"
Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 5:18 AM
Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] dbmail web interface
Paul J St
It is my understanding that the biggest issue with IMAP
web interfaces is connection handling. Basically there is
no connection pool for IMAP on most, at least PHP, web
clients.
This can be handled easily by implementing something like
Perdition IMAP Proxy that has its own connection handling,
in
Kevin Baker wrote:
>It is my understanding that the biggest issue with IMAP
>web interfaces is connection handling. Basically there is
>no connection pool for IMAP on most, at least PHP, web
>clients.
>
>This can be handled easily by implementing something like
>Perdition IMAP Proxy that has its o
On Mon, Aug 1, 2005, Brandon Mercer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Kevin Baker wrote:
>
>>It is my understanding that the biggest issue with IMAP
>>web interfaces is connection handling. Basically there is
>>no connection pool for IMAP on most, at least PHP, web
>>clients.
>>
>>This can be handled e
I didn't catch the java api note... are you considering
Apache James integration? James is a very interesting
project, but w/o IMAP support.. seams like dbmail is a
good fit to help out on a james implementation 'til they
wrap up the imap support. It's been years so it might
never happen for them.
18 matches
Mail list logo