[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000230]: There is a double-free problem in dbmail-imapd.

2005-08-01 Thread bugtrack
The following bug has been ASSIGNED. == http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=230 == Reported By:tmatsuo Assigned To:

Re: [Dbmail-dev] missing Build-Depend in Debian 2.1 package: check

2005-08-01 Thread Paul J Stevens
Christian G. Warden wrote: > I'm attempting to build dbmail2-mysql 2.1.1 using the source package > from Paul's repository. It fails to find check.h from the check > package, which isn't listed in Build-Depends. Comment out the WITH_CHECK line 13 in debian/rules. Unit-testing is for development

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000220]: dbmail-imap crashes in pq library on a double free()

2005-08-01 Thread bugtrack
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug. == http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=220 == Reported By:mavetju Assigned To

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000231]: Multi-line headers mangled by IMAP daemon

2005-08-01 Thread bugtrack
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug. == http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=231 == Reported By:cwarden Assigned To

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Debian Sarge packages / Optimizer O1 vs O2

2005-08-01 Thread Paul J Stevens
No particular reason for the O1. Thomas Mueller wrote: > Hi, > > I know Paul is on vacation - nevertheless maybe someone knows an answer. > > Pauls unstable packages are not installable on Sarge so I compiled new > 2.0.4 packages from SVN. He used the moderate optimizer switch -O1 > instead of -

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000234]: Shared lib relocate R_X86_64_32 amd64

2005-08-01 Thread bugtrack
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug. == http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=234 == Reported By:mike Assigned To:

Re: [Dbmail-dev] dbmail web interface

2005-08-01 Thread Paul J Stevens
Brandon, why reinvent the wheel here? Either use imap where access is restricted to your client, or build a client that links directly to libdbmail. Please take not that 2.1 development is under way, and the tables will change a bit here and there as we add new features or improve performance. Im

Re: [Dbmail-dev] dbmail web interface

2005-08-01 Thread Igor Stroh
Paul J Stevens wrote: > Brandon, > > why reinvent the wheel here? Either use imap where access is restricted > to your client, or build a client that links directly to libdbmail. > > Please take not that 2.1 development is under way, and the tables will > change a bit here and there as we add new

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000235]: dbmail-lmtpd not starting

2005-08-01 Thread bugtrack
The following bug has been SUBMITTED. == http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=235 == Reported By:Jetty Assigned To:

Re: [Dbmail-dev] dbmail web interface

2005-08-01 Thread Brandon Mercer
Igor Stroh wrote: >Paul J Stevens wrote: > > >>Brandon, >> >>why reinvent the wheel here? Either use imap where access is restricted >>to your client, or build a client that links directly to libdbmail. >> >>Please take not that 2.1 development is under way, and the tables will >>change a bit he

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Re: trunk Pg version doesn't compile

2005-08-01 Thread Paul J Stevens
PQServerVersion should be PQserverVersion also. I've fixed both typos in SVN. Thomas Mueller wrote: > Aaron Stone wrote: > >>On Tue, Jul 26, 2005, Igor Stroh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> >>>Thomas Mueller wrote: >>> dbpgsql.c: In function `db_connect': dbpgsql.c:80: warning: implicit dec

[Dbmail-dev] [DBMail 0000231]: Multi-line headers mangled by IMAP daemon

2005-08-01 Thread bugtrack
A BUGNOTE has been added to this bug. == http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/bug_view_advanced_page.php?bug_id=231 == Reported By:cwarden Assigned To

Re: [Dbmail-dev] Re: trunk Pg version doesn't compile

2005-08-01 Thread Aaron Stone
Wow. Intense bug. *smacks self in head* Aaron On Mon, Aug 1, 2005, Paul J Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > PQServerVersion should be PQserverVersion also. > > I've fixed both typos in SVN. > > Thomas Mueller wrote: >> Aaron Stone wrote: >> >>>On Tue, Jul 26, 2005, Igor Stroh <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: [Dbmail-dev] dbmail web interface

2005-08-01 Thread M. J. [Mike] O'Brien
What utter nonesense blaming the protocol for bad front -end code. Fix your code. Mike - Original Message - From: "Igor Stroh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "DBMAIL Developers Mailinglist" Sent: Monday, August 01, 2005 5:18 AM Subject: Re: [Dbmail-dev] dbmail web interface Paul J St

Re: [Dbmail-dev] dbmail web interface

2005-08-01 Thread Kevin Baker
It is my understanding that the biggest issue with IMAP web interfaces is connection handling. Basically there is no connection pool for IMAP on most, at least PHP, web clients. This can be handled easily by implementing something like Perdition IMAP Proxy that has its own connection handling, in

Re: [Dbmail-dev] dbmail web interface

2005-08-01 Thread Brandon Mercer
Kevin Baker wrote: >It is my understanding that the biggest issue with IMAP >web interfaces is connection handling. Basically there is >no connection pool for IMAP on most, at least PHP, web >clients. > >This can be handled easily by implementing something like >Perdition IMAP Proxy that has its o

Re: [Dbmail-dev] dbmail web interface

2005-08-01 Thread Aaron Stone
On Mon, Aug 1, 2005, Brandon Mercer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Kevin Baker wrote: > >>It is my understanding that the biggest issue with IMAP >>web interfaces is connection handling. Basically there is >>no connection pool for IMAP on most, at least PHP, web >>clients. >> >>This can be handled e

Re: [Dbmail-dev] dbmail web interface

2005-08-01 Thread Kevin Baker
I didn't catch the java api note... are you considering Apache James integration? James is a very interesting project, but w/o IMAP support.. seams like dbmail is a good fit to help out on a james implementation 'til they wrap up the imap support. It's been years so it might never happen for them.