On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 04:41:19PM -0400, Geo Carncross wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 12:59 -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 08:02:02PM -0400, Geo Carncross wrote:
> > > > The point is, security and data intergrity *is* very important. But
> > > > it shouldn't be the focusp
On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 16:53 -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> Of course, it goes without saying that DBMail should be coded to reduce
> the likelyhood of any possibility of an attack.
Totally. And not to rain on this parade, but as I don't have enough
spare cycles right now to read and fully digest th
The following issue has been REOPENED.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/view.php?id=370
==
Reported By:ryo
Assigned To:
===
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/view.php?id=370
==
Reported By:ryo
Assigned To:
=
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/view.php?id=370
==
Reported By:ryo
Assigned To:
=
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/view.php?id=368
==
Reported By:rhstone
Assigned To:
=
The following issue has been UPDATED.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/view.php?id=363
==
Reported By:ryo
Assigned To:
The following issue has been REOPENED.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/view.php?id=363
==
Reported By:ryo
Assigned To:
===
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/view.php?id=363
==
Reported By:ryo
Assigned To:
=
On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 16:53 -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> One possibility would be to have the database handle all authentication
> and requests via stored procs, and restricting the dbmail database
> account to only having access to those stored procs. Or you could use
> per-user authentication to
On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 16:31 -0700, Aaron Stone wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-06-21 at 16:53 -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
>
> > Of course, it goes without saying that DBMail should be coded to reduce
> > the likelyhood of any possibility of an attack.
>
> Totally. And not to rain on this parade, but as I do
Hello!
Today i discovered another strange bug.
Since i have started with dbmail i'm running it under solaris running with
sparc processors. Today i wanted to test dbmail on intel based solaris box.
And i discovered new problems. It's really strange.
Below you will find the output from the sparc
The following issue has been SUBMITTED.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/view.php?id=371
==
Reported By:blake
Assigned To:
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/view.php?id=371
==
Reported By:blake
Assigned To:
===
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/view.php?id=371
==
Reported By:blake
Assigned To:
===
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/view.php?id=371
==
Reported By:blake
Assigned To:
===
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
==
http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/view.php?id=371
==
Reported By:blake
Assigned To:
===
17 matches
Mail list logo
