As I said, an IRI is basically a URI that may contain non-ASCII
characters. Also, every valid URI is also a valid IRI, but not vice
versa. http://dbpedia.org/resource/München is an IRI, but not a valid
URI, because "ü" is not an ASCII character. The corresponding URI is
http://dbpedia.org/resource/
On 30 April 2014 20:26, Dario Garcia Gasulla wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my name is Dario Garcia and within the context of my PhD research in AI
> I'm analyzing how pagelinks evolve in DBpedia. When trying to download
> the oldest versions found a couple of issues. The information given for
> the three oldes
"URI reference" was another name for IRI. An IRI is basically a URI
that may contain non-ASCII characters.
See the (outdated) RDF 1.0 spec:
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-rdf-concepts-20040210/#section-Graph-URIref
If I'm not mistaken, the term "URI reference" was used in RDF 1.0
because the RFC
***My apologies for receiving multiple postings***
Call for Papers - The International Conference on Digital Information,
Networking, and Wireless Communication (DINWC2014)
VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, Czech Republic
June 24-26, 2014
Event website: ht
