Hello Mitko,
i think it is Curran's test-query and aims all properties, and not
only dbpedia-onto prop's which are defined in the dataset, but anyway
i think we take it only as a test-query to understand how the engine
works, would i say... Baran.
On Tue, 24 May 2011 19:16:13 +0200, Kingsley Idehen
kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
On 5/24/11 1:08 PM, Curran Kelleher wrote:
Greetings,
The problem remains, the following query doesn't execute on the public
DBPedia endpoint
On Thu, 26 May 2011 22:09:02 +0200, Kingsley Idehen
kide...@openlinksw.com wrote:
On 5/26/11 3:36 PM, baran_H wrote:
LIMIT doesn't simply the Distinct computation. It simply limits the
resultset size.
Dear K. Idehen,
i see
On 5/26/11 5:35 PM, baran_H wrote:
Without 'distinct' it does work:
select ?property where {
?s ?property ?o.
} limit 1
Why might this be?
So you are asserting that for a given data space hosting N named graphs
(named collections of triples) :
select ?property where {
?s
Hi Kingsley,
Specifically, each solution that binds the same variables to the same RDF
terms as another solution is eliminated from the solution set. This sounds
like a first encounter would be added to the result set, and any subsequent
encounters would simply not be added to the result set.
Hi Sarasi,
I've performed that query with limit 1000, and it worked on one of our
local endpoints, and it ended within 3 minutes.
So I guess that the maximum time allowed for a query on the official
endpoint is relatively low, but the query itself is executable with limit.
Hope that helps.
--
On 5/24/11 8:30 AM, Mohamed Morsey wrote:
Hi Sarasi,
I've performed that query with limit 1000, and it worked on one of our
local endpoints, and it ended within 3 minutes.
So I guess that the maximum time allowed for a query on the official
endpoint is relatively low, but the query itself is
On 5/24/11 1:08 PM, Curran Kelleher wrote:
Greetings,
The problem remains, the following query doesn't execute on the public
DBPedia endpoint
http://dbpedia.org/snorql/?query=select+distinct+%3Fproperty+where+%7B%0D%0A+%3Fs+%3Fproperty+%3Fo.%0D%0A%7D+limit+1,
even with a limit:
select
Hi Kingsley,
Thanks for your clarification, but I don't understand why 'first encounter
!= distinct'. I was thinking that DISTINCT just causes duplicate solutions
to be excluded from the result set, just like DISTINCT in SQL. The SPARQL
reference states
On 5/24/11 3:33 PM, Curran Kelleher wrote:
Hi Kingsley,
Thanks for your clarification, but I don't understand why 'first
encounter != distinct'. I was thinking that DISTINCT just causes
duplicate solutions to be excluded from the result set, just like
DISTINCT in SQL.
Yes, but you are
Hi,
I want to extract all properties from the DBpedia data set and I tried the
following query but it did not work. I even tried to limit the results but
still it did not work as well.
select distinct ?property where {
?s ?property ?o .
}
I have the properties defined in the DBpedia
Hi,
the properties in the namespace http://dbpedia.org/ontology will all be
included in the dbpedia ontology.
The others can be found here:
http://wiki.dbpedia.org/Downloads36
http://downloads.dbpedia.org/3.6/en/infobox_property_definitions_en.nt.bz2
The query you mentioned:
Il 23/05/2011 17:44, Sarasi Lalithsena ha scritto:
Hi,
I want to extract all properties from the DBpedia data set and I tried
the following query but it did not work. I even tried to limit the
results but still it did not work as well.
select distinct ?property where {
?s ?property
13 matches
Mail list logo
