2/12/70

2005-01-20 Thread Mark Sherrick
ton & Jr. Wells, Tea Party, Boston 2/12/70, the encore of Fleetwood Mac's set. Also, the 45 AUD tape excerpt from the 2/13/70 Early Show sometimes circulates mislabeled '2/12/70 Ungano's;' for more on this tape see 2/13/70a." SBD:MR>PCM>?>Dat>SSSB>EAC>

2/12/70

2003-11-30 Thread Jim Powell
I take it that Mafco meant the Deadlists entry is incorrect in saying they did not play Ungano's on 2/12/70, but I too would appreciate a clarification on this point. Whichever is the case, it is plain that the tapes circulating mislabled "2/12/70" are no such thing. > > D

Re: 2/12/70

2003-11-29 Thread Dave S
Hi Marco - I was wondering what you meant when you said that 2/12/70 is the incorrect date. Do you mean that the Dead played at your father's nightclub on another occasion - or that the info about them not playing there at all on 2/12/70 was incorrect? Do you know if this was a one

Re: 2/12/70

2003-11-26 Thread alligator69
So what was the date of the show? - Original Message - From: Marco Ungano/ADC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 9:07 pm Subject: 2/12/70 > > Gentlemen, > > Regarding the above date dead show. > > Absolutely incorrect. My father was Nick Unga

2/12/70

2003-11-26 Thread Marco Ungano/ADC
Gentlemen, Regarding the above date dead show. Absolutely incorrect. My father was Nick Ungano, owner of Ungano's night club. Jerry and the boys, went to Ungano's in between shows at the Filmmore. My father worked for Bill Graham as a promoter and booking agent. Both my father and mother wer

Re: 2/13/70a mislabeled 2/12/70

2003-01-26 Thread Charlie Miller
One of the main reasons this is still going on is due to the fact that gdlive.com has it on their server listed as 2/12/70...cm - Original Message - From: Tim Anderson To: Jim Powell ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2003 1:51 PM Subject: Re: 2/13/70a mislabeled 2/12/70

Re: 2/13/70a mislabeled 2/12/70

2003-01-26 Thread Tim Anderson
--- Jim Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tim Anderson & Serafin & Bear are of course free to > create as much > confusion as they want, but I really think the rest > of us have spent ample > time on this question. Jim: I don't believe I was sticking my nose in this controversy beyond pointi

2/13/70a mislabeled 2/12/70

2003-01-26 Thread Jim Powell
Part of the 2/13/70 Early Show has been in circulation mislabeled "2/12/70" for more than 20 years. We proved that it was mislabeled back in the mid 80s. We proved it again a few years ago. Everyone is familiar with Bear's notions about 2/13-14/70. All the evidence proves him

Re: 2/12/70

2003-01-25 Thread Tim Anderson
Jim, maybe you should put a bit in the 2.13.70a entry about the ongoing 2.12.70 controversy. It seems that some people (like Serafin) are siding with Bear's statements that the Fillmore early shows never happened. Hence the ongoing circulation of the "2.12.70" date. No one ever seems to notice, ho

2/12/70

2003-01-25 Thread Marcus Thunich
I'm curious about this too. Jay Serafin seeded this show and goes on in detail provided by his "Marin County Source" about this show here: http://db.etree.org/shninfo_detail.php?shnid=5932 Anyone ever talked to Jay about this? Marcus *** MCSE, MCP,

Re: 2-12-70

2003-01-24 Thread rich plumb
It's listed there. Along with an explanation that it's a bogus date and location. What you actually have is 2-13-70 early. rich --- Donald Bruschi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have a CD Labeled Ungano's NiteClub 2-12-70. The > Songs are: Cold Rain & Snow, Beat

2-12-70

2003-01-24 Thread Donald Bruschi
I have a CD Labeled Ungano's NiteClub 2-12-70. The Songs are: Cold Rain & Snow, Beat It On Down The Line (5 beats), Good Lovin'-> Drums-> Good Lovin', Mama Tried-> Black Peter, Hard To Handle, Saint Stephen-> Not Fade Away, Casey Jones. Is this incorrect? Why is