On 5/24/19 2:46 AM, Muhammad Mashhood wrote:
> Thank you for informative reply and posting this concern on the forum. I am
> also interested in thermoelastic problem and new use of deal.ii.
> My question is that other than the tutorial steps 26 & 18 or 20,21 & 22, is
> there pre-developed
Thanks for sharing the observations Chinedu. So far I am keeping the source
term off for a while i.e. not needed currently. I am sharing the result and
description in the attachment.
On Tuesday, May 28, 2019 at 8:15:14 AM UTC+2, Chinedu Nwaigwe wrote:
>
> Wolfang is right. Negligible values
Hi Prof. Wolfgang! Thank you for the response. Indeed the solution is quite
reasonable and validated with analytical solution if diffusivity is kept
bigger.
Actually in my case I am using the metals and metallic alloys where the
thermal diffusivity are of the range of 1e-5 to 1e-4 m^2/s (I
I would like to follow up on the announcement of this release by publicly
saying again how much we appreciate the many contributions from those who
have sent it code, bug reports, fixed grammar and typos, or have helped in
any other way. Many thanks!
The ChangeLog lists at least the following
Version 9.1.0 of deal.II, the object-oriented finite element library
awarded the
J. H. Wilkinson Prize for Numerical Software, has been released. It is
available for free under an Open Source license from the deal.II homepage at
https://www.dealii.org/
The major changes of
Wolfang is right. Negligible values of diffusion or thermal coefficients
lead to a compete change in the physics of the problem. In that case if
there are source terms the solution might become negative and if there is
no source it will become steady. Things might get worse if advection term
is
