Hello,
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 01:19:57AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
No. You (leader@, auditor@) will need to do this on their own.
If you want to keep track of the money separately, you'd better keep
it marked Debconfn and give leader@, auditor@ authority over it as
well.
That is what
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 05:02:00AM -0500, Richard Darst wrote:
How do you all imagine the DebConf/Debian money separation would work
if accounts are merged?
The basic principle which is at stake here is that DebConf/Debian money
should *not* be separated.
There are two reasons for that: 1)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Velimir and I have been mailing each other back and forth, and I'm just
waiting for him to send the pictures you want to use for the header. If you
send them to me today or tomorrow, we can have the header stuff done this
weekend.
Hi,
I'm not
i guess i don't need to send anything then :)
Velimir
2011/2/18 Vedran Omeragic ved...@vedranomeragic.com:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Velimir and I have been mailing each other back and forth, and I'm just
waiting for him to send the pictures you want to use for the
2011/2/18 Vedran Omeragic ved...@vedranomeragic.com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Velimir and I have been mailing each other back and forth, and I'm just
waiting for him to send the pictures you want to use for the header. If
you
send them to me today or tomorrow, we can
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 06:28:38PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
To me this sounds more like it would would be helpful for you all if
the money would continue to be earmarked differently in the future but
that the Debian project leader and accountant should get a view to
that money as well.
Hi!
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 06:28:38PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
To me this sounds more like it would would be helpful for you all if
the money would continue to be earmarked differently in the future but
that the Debian project leader and accountant should get
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 09:24:24PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
I already wrote that it's no problem to enrich the leader account with
Debconf information.
Yes, and I got that, but as long as the accounts are separate, I don't
think it should be me asking for that, but rather the current
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
Current SPI setting allows for that, while current FFIS setting
(i.e. the split) does not. Obviously, I hope something like the above
will *never* happen, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't be worried about
similar scenarios.
Sorry, but... Why didn't you
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 09:47:50PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
That would solve the problems outlined in this thread, but it would
still be worse than the merge, for a very simple reason: either me or
the auditors, to know the actual total amount of reserves would need to
check two
Clint Adams wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 09:47:50PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
That would solve the problems outlined in this thread, but it would
still be worse than the merge, for a very simple reason: either me or
the auditors, to know the actual total amount of reserves would
Hey there,
Had some free time and made a little something. Two things are different
then in the current header:
- Height is 100px instead of 49px, but that height was also used on
debconf10.debconf.org
- Added city/country to the logo. It's a bit hard to read, but it's a
long word :)
Files
12 matches
Mail list logo
