Hello,
I was wondering if anyone has the problem of random freezing up...
It's getting a bit annoying... whilst in Gnome, even if I'm not using
the PC (and whilst I'm using it), it completely freezes up and a hard
reboot is the only way out...
Configuration:
Gnome
Kernel 2.6.11 (with
Hello,
sorry for my english.
I have same problems, but not only on debian amd64, but on FreeBSD(i386,amd64)
and Debian i386 too. My problems was in video
card(GForce2 MX400) when i use nv driver system was freez(top from ssh console
says that X load 100%). When i started use nvidia drivers, it
That may be the problem then -- As of yet, I haven't been able to get my
nvidia driver working -- it doesn't want to load :( I can't rememebr the
exact debug, as I'm using vesa at the moment as I need to work on things
- it's very annoying having only one screen working though...
I have a
Anyone having difficulty updating from Alioth at the moment?
I haven't seen anything on the Debian Announcements list indicating it's
down.
Failed to fetch
http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64/dists/testing/main/binary-amd64/Packages.gz
Connection failed
Failed to fetch
Yep, I can't apt-get update or apt-get install anything right now...
just hangs on:
bathory4:~# apt-get update
0% [Connecting to debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org (192.25.206.28)]
:(
Pete wrote:
Anyone having difficulty updating from Alioth at the moment?
I haven't seen anything on the Debian
Hi Pete,
I have problems as well with alioth. 30 minutes ago apt-get update did
not even successfully connect to it :(
Regards,
Marko
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marko Kaiser wrote:
Hi Pete,
I have problems as well with alioth. 30 minutes ago apt-get update did
not even successfully connect to it :(
Regards,
Marko
Hi Marko and James,
That's exactly what I'm experiencing, glad it's just not me!
Anyone know what's going on and when it will be alive again?
Javier Kohen schrieb:
Hallo Alex,
El sb, 09-04-2005 a las 01:39 +0200, Alexander Nagel escribi:
When i use
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64 sarge main contrib non-free
redkeep:/home/alex# apt-get install -V libgtk2.0-dev
Paketlisten werden gelesen... Fertig
Abhngigkeitsbaum wird
Pete wrote:
Marko Kaiser wrote:
Hi Pete,
I have problems as well with alioth. 30 minutes ago apt-get update
did not even successfully connect to it :(
Regards,
Marko
Hi Marko and James,
That's exactly what I'm experiencing, glad it's just not me!
Anyone know what's going on and when it will be
Is it possible to go from a Sarge Pure64 installation to a 32-bit debian
installation remotely?
(I have KVM over IP access if that helps in the process any.. but no
CD-ROM on that server)
If its possible could someone please tell me the steps to do it or point
me to a url that covers it?
I have anASUS K8V SE DELUXE...gave up the ide
drives and boot from the SATA drives on the VIA chip VT8237. The
120GSeagate Baracuda's are striped. I tryed installingWIN XP
64 bit just to see ifi'd work but the the drivers on the mobo disk (i put
'em on floppy)are'nt compatible, so I assume
On Saturday 09 April 2005 12:10, Pete wrote:
Marko Kaiser wrote:
Hi Pete,
I have problems as well with alioth. 30 minutes ago apt-get update did
not even successfully connect to it :(
Regards,
Marko
Hi Marko and James,
That's exactly what I'm experiencing, glad it's just not me!
On Saturday 09 April 2005 15:29, Jeremy Gray wrote:
Is it possible to go from a Sarge Pure64 installation to a 32-bit debian
installation remotely?
(I have KVM over IP access if that helps in the process any.. but no
CD-ROM on that server)
If its possible could someone please tell me the
(snip)
Another thing that is a bit annoying, and that may be due to my own
lack of knowledge, is the boot utility (either grub or lilo) which
doesn't do what I would like it to.
I was usually starting another OS on /dev/sda1, with the Bios boot
device being the associated SATA
My apt-get update is now working fine...
I'm using sarge though..
Get:1 http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org sarge/main Packages [3206kB]
Get:2 http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org sarge/main Release [108B]
Get:3 http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org sarge/contrib Packages [45.6kB]
Get:4
---BeginMessage---
Alexander Nagel wrote:
Javier Kohen schrieb:
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 sarge main
contrib non-free
is mentioned in the FAQ so it's some kind official
and therefore these packages seems to be broken.
And the other adress:
deb
Hi.
I had the same problem, only running kde. It got so bad I pulled my video
card (gforce 5200 FX) and am using my radeon 7000 with no problems no for
about a week now.
I is (was) going to buy a new ati, now I'm beginning to wonder if it really
was a software problem.
amd64 3200
1 gig ram
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 12:53:17PM +0200, Alexander Nagel wrote:
That is clear.
But
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 sarge main
contrib non-free
is mentioned in the FAQ so it's some kind official
and therefore these packages seems to be broken.
There is no
On Saturday 09 April 2005 01:03 pm, A.E.Lawrence wrote:
Can someone clarify this please? The FAQ, the AMD64 and the archive
structure document (alioth seems to be down just now, so I haven't got
the URIs) all differ just enough to be confusing :-)
I find broken package dependencies in
Hello all,
I've managed to set up nvidia drivers before on this amd64 machine, but
since I've upgraded to my new kernel 2.6.11 with realtime-lsm, nvidia
module doesn't want to work.
Says something about interupt requests in the below listed
XFree86.0.log, and I'm not too sure where to go with
Hello,
If and when I get my nvidia module working properly, I'll report back if
I get any more crashes ;)
James
Chris Wakefield wrote:
Hi.
I had the same problem, only running kde. It got so bad I pulled my video
card (gforce 5200 FX) and am using my radeon 7000 with no problems no for
about
Hello,
is this bug reproducible only if the highly experimental gcc-3.4/gcc-4.0
branch is used, as stated in the quoted mysql-bts bugs, or does this
happen using a standard debian-pure64 (gcc-3.3 based) installation too?
A quote from mysql bug #3483:
I've tried 4.0.23, 4.1.9, 4.1.10 on two
James Titcumb wrote:
Hello all,
I've managed to set up nvidia drivers before on this amd64 machine,
but since I've upgraded to my new kernel 2.6.11 with realtime-lsm,
nvidia module doesn't want to work.
Says something about interupt requests in the below listed
XFree86.0.log, and I'm not too
Frederik Schueler wrote:
Hello,
is this bug reproducible only if the highly experimental gcc-3.4/gcc-4.0
branch is used, as stated in the quoted mysql-bts bugs, or does this
happen using a standard debian-pure64 (gcc-3.3 based) installation too?
A quote from mysql bug #3483:
I've tried
Trying to upgrade my kernel image from debian-pure64 -- an image I
pulled from there for another system recently was not found. When I
look, there are many kernel images of many architctures, but none for
amd64. Disturbing.
Don
Don Hayward at pomobuli.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Mike Reinehr wrote:
The correct archives to be using are:
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 sid main contrib
non-free
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 sarge main contrib
non-free
Thanks for that confirmation. But I am getting dependency problems which
On Saturday 09 April 2005 02:54 pm, A.E.Lawrence wrote:
Mike Reinehr wrote:
The correct archives to be using are:
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 sid main contrib
non-free deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 sarge
main contrib non-free
I have a dual boot system with a 32bit kernel and a 64bit kernel
version 2.6.10, and I have a big XFS partition for my data on the SATA
hard disk. After running the 32bit kernel, I cannot mount my XFS
partition with the 64bit kernel. When I try, I get the following error
messages:
Apr 9 18:43:01
Kurt Roeckx schrieb:
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 12:53:17PM +0200, Alexander Nagel wrote:
That is clear.
But
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 sarge main
contrib non-free
is mentioned in the FAQ so it's some kind official
and therefore these packages seems to be broken.
There
On Saturday 09 April 2005 16:32, James Titcumb wrote:
My apt-get update is now working fine...
I'm using sarge though..
Get:1 http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org sarge/main Packages [3206kB]
Get:2 http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org sarge/main Release [108B]
Get:3
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 10:18:40PM +0200, Alexander Nagel wrote:
If libgtk2.0-dev can't be installed, I think it's because one of
the packages you've installed, and that you need to remove one of
those package to be able to install it. Did you install anything
that's not part of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
from my various experiences with XFS :
it sucks when you change kernel version and even more when you change
from architecture.
I was running it on a bi-opteron box with 64 bits kernel on 32 bits
userland. I got tons of problems with their tools
Mike Reinehr wrote:
On Saturday 09 April 2005 02:54 pm, A.E.Lawrence wrote:
Mike Reinehr wrote:
The correct archives to be using are:
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 sid main contrib
non-free deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 sarge
main contrib
Can you run:
LC_ALL=POSIX apt-get -o Debug::pkgProblemResolver=true install
libgtk2.0-dev
redkeep:/home/alex# LC_ALL=POSIX apt-get -o
Debug::pkgProblemResolver=true install libgtk2.0-dev
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Starting
Starting 2
Investigating zlib1g-dev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Steffen wrote:
Any comments? Is there a place where multiarch is actively discussed?
Or is there even an example distribution that does something similar?
At my university, they run what looks like a working multiarch
implementation on an
On Saturday 09 April 2005 04:31 pm, A.E.Lawrence wrote:
I didn't see the resolutions in those earlier postings :-) But perhaps
they went silent when things cleared.
But this:-
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libc6-dev:
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 10:31:33PM +0100, A.E.Lawrence wrote:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libc6-dev: Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-20) but
2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.pure64 is to be installed
Please downgrade your libc6 to the 2.3.2.ds1-20 version. This
might require a few
Alex Perry wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If nothing else an opteron runs the i386 version of debian faster
thananything else, and if you need 64bit support, it can do that too (I
believe sarge does have amd64-libs and an amd64 kernel that can be used
on i386 sarge to run 64bit programs when
38 matches
Mail list logo
