Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 08:13:42PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>
>>Perhaps I missed something, but why is amd64 still not
>>included into the "official" package pool?
>>
>>I am still in the NM process, but maybe I can help?
>
>
> It's a case of one architecture too many,
there is chatter on the ppc list (which im also fairly
active on) but obviously installing a ppc kernel would
be a Bad Idea (tm), atleast on machines other than my
ibook
ill look for 12 and see what happens
from the changelogs on kernel.org there is a lot of
stuff going on for amd64 and 64bit in
Corey Hickey wrote:
>Zaq Rizer wrote:
>
>
>>It shows the loading page for about a second, then immediately crashes
>>with a segfault. Information regarding the crash from the console is as
>>follows:
>>
>>++
>>found DLL in pak file: /Shared/Games/quake4/q4base/game100.pk4/gamex86.so
On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 12:36:29PM +1000, Dean Hamstead wrote:
> hence, has anyone got newer kernel debs than
> those the official deb repositories (2.6.11 is
> the lastest there, im after 2.6.12 or upto 14)
.12 has been in the archive for ages, but it's called
linux-image-2.6.12-*, rather than th
elina
SPZI-is our hot pick this week, you're getting
this email first before the company launches
a huge promotion this upcoming weekend because
you're a Premier Member on our list. So be
aware of this alert and we recommend this company
highly be sure to get in early. Our last pick
was up 80 perc
I hate you : )
AMD Athlon64 3000+, 512 Mb RAM, 27 Gb ATA133 HDD, nVidia GeForce 2 MX
64 MB AGP 4x, and a great 8x CDROM, with a wonderful ECS EliteGroup
nForce 2-A (nForce 2 chipset)
I hope to get a nvidia geforce 6600 256mb AGP 8x and a SATA150 80gb
HDD so I can Cedega my little life away : )
well everything else works bar ut2004. and you have a point about
putting up with it
i have a dfi-lanparty ut sli board (nf4)
and 6600gt 256mb pcie
dual sata wd raptors (36gb)
its worth going to k8 just to see what happens
Dean
lordSauron wrote:
I don't know... you might have to survive with
generic as k8 pagefaults when i try to use my cdrom
which is frustrating
Dean
lordSauron wrote:
are you running the -k8 or the -generic kernel? I know that the -k8
works perfectly on nForce 2 chipsets (well, the one found in the ECS
EliteGroup nForce 2-A board, anyways...)
--
To UNSUBSCR
ive exhausted nvidia support forums, its not a build
problem but a very odd problem with ut2004 and only
ut2004 (on both 32bit and 64bit)
so its time to update the kernel and see what
happens.
hence, has anyone got newer kernel debs than
those the official deb repositories (2.6.11 is
the lastes
I have always used (built) the proprietary nvidia drivers when
necessary. video or motherboard? There was an old problem with nvnet
(part of the nforce set that covers motherboard peripheral function )
that now appears resolved, in the sense that the proprietary drivers are
up to snuff.
has anyone got unofficial kernel debs ?
i could build my own but im just trying to
fix these damned nvidia drivers.
im looking for 2.6.14 or something
Dean
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Frederik,
Thanks much. I will test this. With the exception of some
disquieting kernel logs:
Oct 23 07:00:38 line kernel: APIC error on CPU0: 40(40)
Oct 23 07:00:38 line kernel: APIC error on CPU1: 40(40)
Oct 23 07:07:19 line kernel: APIC error on CPU0: 40(40)
Oct 23 07:07:19 line kernel
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 08:13:42PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Perhaps I missed something, but why is amd64 still not
> included into the "official" package pool?
>
> I am still in the NM process, but maybe I can help?
It's a case of one architecture too many, rather than a problem with
amd64 s
On Sat, Oct 22, 2005 at 09:07:47PM -0400, Nathan O. Siemers wrote:
>Unfortunately 2 hours is not enough time to say this is a stable
> configuration (24 hours is better), but encouraging. I have hit the
> system with high cpu, video, disk, and ieee load to test but sometime
> the clock star
Every now and then I have this little jumping icon on my screen with a entry
in the kicker calling itself "HTTP Cache Cleaner"
I have no clue as to what is producing it, I suspect something KDE.
Except irritably jumping up and down for a full 10 minutes this thing doesn't
seem to do anything
Le Lundi 24 Octobre 2005 23:27, Dominique Rousset a écrit :
> Le Lundi 24 Octobre 2005 23:00, Lennart Sorensen a écrit :
> Further investigations indicate an extra time step on AMD64 which result in
> one extra floating point value per record.
> The number of time steps is computed using floating p
Thomas Steffen wrote:
On 10/25/05, Adam Skutt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Concerning the tool chain: I noticed (on Solaris, both 32 and 64bit)
that you actually only need a few libraries and a few support files to
compile and run C applications using the OCI. In fact, this works a
lot better f
Jean-Christophe Montigny wrote:
Well, I am afraid I'm not quite postgresql-literate, and I live by the
(perhaps false) assumption that PostgreSQL and MySQL are more or less
the same :
That's a totally false assumption. You'd be better off thinking of
PostgreSQL as "Oracle-lite" as that's wha
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
I posted a few patches to the BTS adding the multiarch dirs to the
toolchain without breaking existing practices. Once those are added we
can start patching packages to use those new dirs.
I don't want to start and maintain a second amd64 archive (and extra
patches)
Lennart Sorensen wrote:>
Other than live replication and failover and such, I can't think of
anything that I know oracle can do that postgresql can't. Of course I
haven't really used oracle so I imagine there is something (besides cost
you a lot of cash).
It has a whole ton of OLAP and other ana
Thomas Steffen wrote:
I tried that, but gave up pretty soon. The basic problem is that
Oracle is compiled for a hybrid system, that has 32bit libraries in
/lib and 64bit libraries in /lib64. Only a few components are actually
64bit, while most GUI tools (including the installer, IIRC) are in
fact
On 10/25/05, Adam Skutt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> More than anything, it's builtin JRE is 32-bits, and it's very hard to
> get it to use anything else.
Yep, that is probably the reason. If you can make a standard 32bit JRE
work, then installing Oracle seems quite possible.
> Note in all cases,
Hi,
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
So that is 'Why no mysql', how about 'why no postgresql' part of the
original question?
Well, I am afraid I'm not quite postgresql-literate, and I live by the
(perhaps false) assumption that PostgreSQL and MySQL are more or less
the same : open source database pro
I installed it by sourceforge :D and now is running okay :DOn 10/20/05, debianista.deb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:nop still not working ;P I don't know why ;( same bug segmentation fault
$ java -version
java version "1.4.2-02"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build Blackdown-1.4
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 08:16:08PM +0200, Jean-Christophe Montigny wrote:
> Adam Stiles wrote:
> >The proper way to fix it would be to recompile the whole package from
> >source so it works with your existing installation. But that probably is
> >not an option for you ;)
> >
> >So let's ask a d
Hi,
Adam Stiles wrote:
The proper way to fix it would be to recompile the whole package from source
so it works with your existing installation. But that probably is not an
option for you ;)
So let's ask a different question instead.
What do you need Oracle for that you can't do using Post
Hi folks,
Perhaps I missed something, but why is amd64 still not
included into the "official" package pool?
I am still in the NM process, but maybe I can help?
Regards
Harri
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Am Tuesday, 25. October 2005 02:31 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[snip]
> Because the kernel address space has to hold more than just RAM (in
> particular, it also has to hold memory-mapped PCI devices like
> video cards), if you have 1G of physical memory, the kernel will by
> default only use 896M o
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 03:46:15PM +0200, FrekoDing wrote:
> there are mistakes...
>
> case "$type" in
> L) ln -s $arg1 /dev/$name ;;
> D) mkdir -p /dev/$name ;;
> M) mknod --mode=660 /dev/$name $arg1 ;;
> O) chown $arg1 /dev/$name ;;
> G) chgrp $arg1 /dev/$name ;;
>
On Tuesday 25 October 2005 16:51, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 04:46:28PM +0200, Milan Melichercik wrote:
> > We will have (in our company) 2 pcs. of exactly the same model U
> > mentioned. So probably I can later reffer - when they arrive...
> > BTW: I have Epox MB at home (so
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 04:46:28PM +0200, Milan Melichercik wrote:
> We will have (in our company) 2 pcs. of exactly the same model U mentioned.
> So
> probably I can later reffer - when they arrive...
> BTW: I have Epox MB at home (sock. A with nForce2) and no problem (and my
> friends have sim
Rob Sims ecrivait le 30.09.2005 22:54:
And in /etc/init.d/udev changed the case statement in make_extra_nodes:
case "$type" in
L) ln -s $arg1 /dev/$name ;;
D) mkdir -p /dev/$name ;;
M) mknod --mode=600 /dev/$name $arg1 ;;
O) chown /dev/$name $arg
On Tuesday 25 October 2005 16:36, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 09:47:08AM +0200, Michael Dominok wrote:
> > I'm subscribed to this List for about 2 Months now but failed to find a
> > single Post, amongst the many that deal with Hardware-Problems, that
> > concerns the EPoX 9NP
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 12:09:19AM -0400, John Baab wrote:
> I seem to be having some problems with my optical drives, I cannot remember
> when the last time is that I used them successfully though. My current setup
> includes 2 optical drives:
> Lite-On LDW-811S (primary)(dvdrw)
> Lite-On LTR-5232
I was able to track down the problem. It was a problem with my router.
Clyde
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 11:29:15AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> hjalmar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Sory if this is a copy of the one sent. Have been reworking my mail setup
> > and was not sure if it came t
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 09:47:08AM +0200, Michael Dominok wrote:
> I'm subscribed to this List for about 2 Months now but failed to find a
> single Post, amongst the many that deal with Hardware-Problems, that
> concerns the EPoX 9NPA+ Ultra, or similar, Mainboard.
I have never even heard of the b
On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 07:56:35AM -0400, Bas van Besouw wrote:
> Ken,
> Most laptops should be fine. As far as I have seen, and experienced, the
> biggest problem are wireless cards.. And then only in 64bit mode, which I
> believe you want to use. Make sure the wireless card is in the hardware
>
On Sunday 23 October 2005 18:42, Faheem Mitha wrote:
> Dear People,
>
> I am (unfortunately) trying to install Oracle Database 10g on Debian
> AMD64. I know this is routinely done on i386, but I'm having some
> problems.
>
> The errors I get appear below, when I try to bring up the installer screen
Jean-Jacques de Jong schrieb:
>>The home directories are not moved.
>>
> Yes they are, I experienced it (at least with 32 bit Sarge). It happens when
> you
> choose to install over your old / partition without reformatting - the
> installer
> then lets you choose an option keeping the data. I
On 10/23/05, Faheem Mitha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am (unfortunately) trying to install Oracle Database 10g on Debian
> AMD64. I know this is routinely done on i386, but I'm having some
> problems.
I tried that, but gave up pretty soon. The basic problem is that
Oracle is compiled for a hybr
Ken,
Most laptops should be fine. As far as I have seen, and experienced, the biggest problem are wireless cards.. And then only in 64bit mode, which I believe you want to use. Make sure the wireless card is in the hardware compattibility list. If not, then there are some other options like ndisw
GH wrote:
Jean-Jacques de Jong schrieb:
I noticed that you can install Debian over another distribution when
using existing partitions. Apparently the home directories are then
moved into / while all other directories are erased. However, does the
installer do this also with /usr/
Hi,
I have the same problem during install of debian
amd64:
> [!!] Install the base
system> Base system installation error> The debootstrap program
exited with an error (return value 2).>> (next
page...)>> Failed to install the base system> The b
I have the same problem.
Question: how to solve it?
Kristof;
On Monday 24 October 2005 21:32, Dominique Rousset wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I've been a silent subscriber to this list for the past 3+ months, and now,
> I am coming with my question...
>
> I am benchmarking a fortran code of my own (simulation of seismic wave
> propagation)
> whose output is a
On Tuesday, 25.10.2005 at 11:36 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> The recommended (and only user friendly) way to build a 64bit kernel
> is a 64bit userland.
>
> For i386 users that means installing the existing 64bit kernel, create
> a 64bit chroot and compile the kernel in there.
>
> That w
Max <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Paul Brook wrote:
>
Is it because I have a 32-bit i686 userspace and this is
considered cross-compiling or something??
>>> From old version of FAQ:
>>>
>>> ===
>>>
>>> *Crosscompiling a 64bit kernel on a 32bit host*
>>
>> Most of this is obsolete. The
"Matthew A. Nicholson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Are there any new updates on multiarch or is it still just a purposal?
> I say we organize a team to get multiarch working and stop sitting on
> our hands.
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe".
hjalmar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sory if this is a copy of the one sent. Have been reworking my mail setup
> and was not sure if it came through. My problem below:
>
>
>> I have just ran aptitude update and got the following result
>>
>> Hit http://bach.hpc2n.umu.se unstable/non-free Package
Jean-Jacques de Jong schrieb:
> I noticed that you can install Debian over another distribution when
> using existing partitions. Apparently the home directories are then
> moved into / while all other directories are erased. However, does the
> installer do this also with /usr/local? On the machi
Ken Bloom schrieb:
> I say start with Len's installer (the tinyplanet.ca one) because it's
> got a newer kernel. If you use it, things are more likely to work the
> first time.
THX! I´ve tried the Sarge one on the testing maschine, and it seems to
work well except for that it doesn´t detect the o
Hi
I'm now worried as I nearly understand this!!
I need to play more guitar!!
Many thanks for a well written mail.
cheers
Bob
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This seems to come up every now and then, so let me explain.
None of this is new information, butt can be a bit confusing.
First, i386 memo
Hi, I know I should have submitted this question to the laptop list, but I guess this is the most appropriate place to post it. I wish to buy a laptop that features and AMD64 processor and a nice 17inch view. Does anyone have any recommendations? I'll really appreciate your input. Thanks,
Regar
On Monday, 24.10.2005 at 23:01 +0100, Paul Brook wrote:
> On Monday 24 October 2005 22:35, Max wrote:
> > Dave Ewart wrote:
> > > Is it because I have a 32-bit i686 userspace and this is
> > > considered cross-compiling or something??
> >
> > From old version of FAQ:
> >
> > ===
> >
> > *Crosscom
Hi Folks,
I'm subscribed to this List for about 2 Months now but failed to find a
single Post, amongst the many that deal with Hardware-Problems, that
concerns the EPoX 9NPA+ Ultra, or similar, Mainboard.
That makes me become suspicious. Am i the only one using this Board and
if so why? What doe
55 matches
Mail list logo