-assistant
m-a -t prepare
m-a a-i -t nvidia
dpkg -i nvidia-glx*deb
Thanks!
Dave
David Liontooth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
A git patch from 6 September 2005
(http://www.grmso.net:8090/commit/5dd42c262bd742fa3602180bbe5550b4828de8f3/)
removes the functions register_ioctl32_conversion
Alexandru Cardaniuc wrote:
Hi All!
Is KDE 3.4.2 transition over in SID? Can I safely dist-upgrade?
I had no problems with this upgrade -- massive and flawless.
Exceptions: lost pixie; avifile-player not installable. There may be a
few other packages that haven't made the transition, but I
Is there a story behind the conflict between packages depending on
libcurl3 vs libcurl3-gnutls?
# wajig install xine-ui
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
libcurl3-gnutls
Suggested packages:
libldap2-dev
The following
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 06:37:26PM +0200, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
In contrast, putting an Ubuntu (amd64 5.10 preview) CD in the drive and
And what kernel does that version of ubuntu use and when was it
released?
2.6.12...
Please compare
Hm, a bit off-topic for amd64, right?
Anyways, there is a pretty good German page for all xhtml and css tags
- unfortunately only the CSS part has been translated into English,
but maybe that can at least be of some help:
http://en.selfhtml.org/css/index.htm
~David
On 8/24/05, Nigel Ridley
and the CD should be mountable as device
/dev/scd0.
~David
Actually,
as usual, once I had hit send, I remembered: It's right on the rar
page, just hidden under extras: http://www.rarlabs.com/rar_add.htm
I think it's a static binary, compiled for 64bit.
~David
On 7/19/05, David Mohr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found a binary after plenty of searching
, at least with the
nv_sata controller it was just this small change:
/include/linux/libata.h: change
#undef ATA_ENABLE_ATAPI
to
#define ATA_ENABLE_ATAPI
After that your SATA Plextor will show up.
~David
www.google.com and type: how to respond to a question
Seriously, is telling someone to google an answer to their question
anywhere close to a useful response. It's not worth the space it
takes up in my inbox or the forums.
Anyway, iptables -L will tell you what your current firewall rules
are.
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, antongiulio05 wrote:
At start, notebook temperature was for thermal 1: 40 C and thermal 2: 47 C
(from 'acpi -V'). Running command above (and so 'gpg' process) my system
becomes unstable (auto key pressing etc.), and temperature is jumped to 55 C
for 1, and 88 C for 2 in
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, antongiulio05 wrote:
Yes:) However I'm running (how Gnu-Raiz suggests) prime 95 to stress
processor. Temperature is constant. And it doesn't show unstability. I'll continue test
for many hours again.
Heat problems can be intermittent. Heat is regulated by some of the
addresses the smtp and ssh server
are actually bound? Do you have a firewall (ok, nmap should've noticed
that, but good to check anyways)?
~David
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
3rd party software is nearly completly 32bit and our 32bit libs are
already in the wrong place for rpath then. We can move
/emul/ia32-libs/lib/* to /lib/i486-linux/ (same for usr/lib in all
cases) without changing anything.
We can also move
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Bob Proulx wrote:
I really don't like needing to change the package names to be uniquely
named. I think for multiarch to really work in Debian then dpkg needs
to have a split brain where the architecture specific packages are
tracked separately.
I think he just means for
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Hmm, I use Acrobat Reader, Mplayer and a bit of Wine on my
pure64. What problems do you have?
The only important thing that distinguishes mplayer from all the other
video players is its ability to use win32 codecs, and thus be actually
useful
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Getting the toolchain adapted is more important than some trivial mv
commands for libs.
You're right, of course, but I don't understand why we should avoid doing
them. With the new dirs in place and linked from the old locations,
package
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
1) We are not that compatible to begin with
In what way? We follow LSB and such.
Different baseline libraries, different _available_, _packaged_
libraries, different compiler versions, different directory structures
(for instance, important
Digesting about 8 things into a single response...
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
You only need dpkg support to utilize it. The design is such that the
debs shall remain compatible to older debian. You just don't get the
multiarch benefits. So apt/dpkg are not realy blocking
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Mplayer can play all the common files in 64bit directly except the mov
files of current movie trailers. Anything else mplayer needs w32codecs
for are rather uncommon in my experience.
I find 64-bit unplayable real, wmv and mov files to be by far
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Go to snapshot.debian.net and fish out the right library versions
suse/rh uses, install them, install the same packages (inetd/xinetd)
suse/rh uses and voila. Compatibility.
Even if libraries were the only issue, aren't there times when the
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2005 at 11:46:12AM -0400, David Wood wrote:
Something else ugly... Just curious, why would this break:
mkdir /usr
mkdir /usr/lib
ln -s /usr/lib /usr/lib/i386-linux
It's recursive, but it appears functional...
Yes but now all
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Hugo Mills wrote:
It's pretty vague, since it doesn't deal with any of the problems
of actually implementing those (fairly high-level) suggestions in any
given package management system.
That doesn't seem to me like something that's wrong.
Are you saying something
-configurable WM for gnome?
Thanks!
~David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Adam Stiles wrote:
Binary compatibility is irrelevant at best {every Linux machine already has a
compiler installed} and harmful at worst {Windows has wide-scale binary
compatibility -- and rampant malware}. All that matters is _source_
compatibility: that the same
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
But you don't realy gain anything by multiarch for amd64. Only 3
things come to my mind: OpenOffice, Flash support and w32codecs +
32bit mplayer. And only OO is in Debian.
Maybe add wine to that list? (Disclaimer, haven't tried it lately)
I
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Hugo Mills wrote:
It caused considerable controversy when it was first suggested, and
continued to do so for some time. I suspect that the only reason it
isn't causing much controversy at the moment is because very few
people are doing anything on it right now, so it's not
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Hugo Mills wrote:
I guess I can only ask... what... on... earth... was the problem?
See below...
Actually, I don't see where you've said what was objectionable about
multiarch.
Well, let's say you want to install a 32-bit xine. That's written
in C, so you have to
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Hugo Mills wrote:
The whole set of problems with the package management.
I don't understand. As far as I could see the problem you raised was what
a (finished) multiarch solves.
As I think I said in my mail, I don't know enough about the
library-building side of it
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 03:04:56PM -0400, David Wood wrote:
I don't understand. As far as I could see the problem you raised was what
a (finished) multiarch solves.
Multiarch was never finished as far as I know.
I'm just trying to understand what
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Paul Brook wrote:
Until you have a coherent and generally acceptable plan for how to handle the
hard bits is there any point doing anything (other than as proof-of-concept)?
If you start migrating things before the long-term strategy has been agreed
you risk having to do
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Thomas Steffen wrote:
As programmer I have to say that it should be, if you apply the due
care. However, it will never really work unless you actually test and
debug it. BTW, gcc/gdb does not properly support 64bit on SPARC, just
as a side note on magically portable.
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
The main objection is to change locations of files in a way that is
incompatible with existing software on linux.
But it is not incompatible unless you remove the links - and then you are
no longer following the proposal.
Would they not work
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
No I am sure we will, we just won't claim it is a trivial change.A
It looks trivial to make the new directories and links and _start_.
No such claims about the rest. :)
Starting to make a pile of symlinks without a plan certainly doesn't
seem
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Thomas Steffen wrote:
The initiative has been taken by other distributions, and I don't see
a viable alternative to follow their approach. That means /usr/lib for
32bit libs and /usr/lib64 for the 64bit libs. Yes, it is ugly, but it
is close to inevitable.
1) We are not
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
There are not going to be any symlinks at all. There is no need
So, the posted documents are not correct on this (basic, major) point?
And why not have them? Obviously there is a need - to ease migration...
If I may venture a little further, the idea
I think the distros that support amd64 will tend to be roughly the same in
terms of FP performance. On x32, the only people I could see making a
plausible argument to superiority would be the Gentoo guys, and even that,
I'm sure people will argue. On amd64 I think there may be less of a
On Tue, 21 Jun 2005, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
There probably will be a new debian package for the new nvidia driver
soon, assuming it hasn't changed anything drastic.
Good question. Depending on a glibc from experimental might be considered
drastic. :/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 10:38 +, J.A. de Vries wrote:
I would appreciate that very much. I'd give me something to build on.
My steps after building a new kernel package are:
1) back up /boot/grub/menu.lst
2) comment out or move aside /etc/ld.so.conf
3) run ldconfig
4) dpkg -i your new kernel
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, . wrote:
At last, I upgraded to sid, see my previous mail here ...
OK, I'm glad this apparently went smoothly for you. I was concerned
because it sounded like you installed with sarge and then used apt to
upgrade to sid; I've never done it, and although I think it
Version numbering for base-files and libc6 was changed. You need to force
yourself out of the .pure64 versions. This is covered on the mailing list
in the past but... documented anywhere else yet? Not sure.
i.e.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-amd64/2005/04/msg00242.html
Although now I'd say
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, . wrote:
TXH! But what sources.list should I use? I was using pure64, but it
wasn´t possible to do an update with that, so I came up to the following:
I don't have the machine in front of me, but I believe I'm using:
deb http://amd64.debian.net/debian/ sid main contrib
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, . wrote:
Yes, I was using testing before stable, but what has been testing has
apparently become sarge, and I suppose sarge is more stable than testing
(and sid) now.
It may just be safest to refer to sarge and sid, rather than
stable/testing/etc, since the latter are
Wish I had anything constructive to add other than, me too.
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, Graham Smith wrote:
I, as I am sure many of your do, suffer from the fam problem. Basically it
goes like this: I will be working away quite happily, I go to open a file and
fam hits 100% cpu load and never stops.
I have been using LVM with debian/amd64 since I first set up the box,
including the root FS - a relatively long time now. It is quite stable, I
can tell you that much. I myself use reiserfs, which you can, along with
LVM, resize online and so forth. It's not your only filesystem choice by
any
Does this work now? For many months, ondemand was a guaranteed OOPS within
a matter of hours (if not minutes); I've been using cpufreq-userspace and
the associated daemon.
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005, Rafael Rodríguez wrote:
With recent kernels, that's better done with 'ondemand' governor, which
Great news. I'll have to try it out. :)
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005, Rafael Rodríguez wrote:
Been using ondemand for months now (since 2.6.10 IIRC). No oopses related to
it. And haven't had to keep an eye on any daemon anymore :)
Rafael Rodríguez
El Martes, 14 de Junio de 2005 19:54, David Wood
Rupert Heesom wrote:
I've noticed 1 or 2 historical threads here on Azureus.
I'm trying to run the latest SF version 2.3.0.2, but it can't do much
without crashing, then refusing to load!
I'm using java jre1.5.0_03.
After downgrading to java 1.4.2, azureus runs fine -- ran for twenty hours.
Sadly, when measuring a filesystem's reputation, if (controlling as best
you can for hardware faults) 9 out of 10 people say it works great, never
had a problem, while one says it blew up on them, that's a _terrible_
filesystem.
I need to check, but I think, statistically, XFS is faring
Hi Tudiatya,
The MSI K8N Neo2, if that's the board you have, should be
using the nforce3 chipset, which has an nforce3 sata raid
and a silicon image 3512 sata raid.
If that's correct, I'd try this:
1. Undo the overclocking to get the installation done
2. If the sata raid still isn't
Tudiatya wrote:
if my CPU support
higher speeds, I won't let it go by default.
I wasn't arguing against overclocking, just turn it off for the sake of
getting an installation going.
You'll be loosing sympathy fast if you insist on creating unnecessary
installation problems. Once
you have
antonio giulio wrote:
The 2.6.10 kernel boot process takes over the modem, so that the slamr
driver gets the message that the modem is already in use by another
driver. To stop this from happening, the drivers/serial/8250_pci.c file
must be patched. A patch has been submitted to lkml by Sasha
antonio giulio wrote:
I tried to contact smartlink inc. but every mail-address seems down...
However, in Suse-ml I have found a new interesting post:
http://lists.suse.com/archive/suse-amd64/2005-Mar/0098.html
and it confirms possibility to get a slmodem working on debian amd64 too.
Giulio
I have this exact same problem. I've had it ever since I went to amd64,
for a long long time now. Don't know if it's an amd64 thing, a
particular-USB-chip thing, a debian/discover/hotplug thing, or a recent
Linux kernel thing altogether. Interestingly, though, Graham's motherboard
is
A J Stiles wrote:
On Friday 20 May 2005 13:39, Per Lundberg wrote:
On Sun, 2005-05-15 at 10:57 -0700, David Liontooth wrote:
Update: I now checked with lspci and this is the only ethernet card
being listed:
:03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd.: Unknown
device
Hi Per,
Per Lundberg wrote:
PL But this is the strange thing: one of the network adapters on
PL this motherboard are supposed to be based on this chip. I
PL cannot get it working with Linux, though.
Update: I now checked with lspci and this is the only ethernet card being
listed:
understand what you did, and I don't want to guess wrong and hose my
whole system.
Do I want base-files 3.1.2-0.0.0.3.pure64? Or just 3.1.2?
Do I want libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.pure64? or 2.3.2.ds1-21?
What is the safest way to handle this transition?
-David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
what it's like to be in your shoes and
do a lot of work for nothing and have to answer stupid questions all the
time. You're wrong. I know what it's like. But do you know what it feels
like to try to use pure64 right now?
Regards,
-David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
pure64 users there are, but maybe even I won't be
the last person to ask this?
Regards,
-David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linking error -- earlier messages suggest this is binutils-related:
LD .tmp_vmlinux1
ld: BFD 2.15 assertion fail ../../bfd/linker.c:619
KSYM.tmp_kallsyms1.S
AS .tmp_kallsyms1.o
LD .tmp_vmlinux2
ld: BFD 2.15 assertion fail ../../bfd/linker.c:619
KSYM
David Liontooth wrote:
Jonathan Schaeffer wrote:
Hi,
From the repository
http://mirror.switch.ch/ftp/mirror/debian-amd64/debian-pure64,
I installed the nvu package which made a formidable segmentation fault:b
Can anyone reproduce this ?
Yes. More recent versions have been released
Javier Kohen wrote:
El sb, 30-04-2005 a las 12:05 -0700, David Liontooth escribi:
Yes. More recent versions have been released for x86; are there build
problems preventing these appearing in amd64?
The update 0.99+1.0pre-1 is now available, but it still segfaults:
/usr/lib/nvu
Chris Wakefield wrote:
Greetings all.
I just experienced a spontaneous shutdown. I was just loading debian.org in
Konqueror 3.4.0 when my machine stopped as if I hit the reset switch:
(I know what you're thinking, I kicked the reset with my knee :^) .. but
no, it's protected from that.)
,...}, whichever you need.
Good luck,
David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Michal Hajek wrote:
Hello list,
I have GA-K8NS Pro-939 motherboard, rev. 1002 and I am trying to install debian
amd64 on it.
The system includes 1 ata cdrom drive and 1 sata hard drive (Seagate
Barracuda 7200.7, 120gb, model ST3120827AS, firmware 3.42).
Unlike the author of the message
this.
Reply (to the list or privately) if you need more information.
Greetings,
David Hartveld
Max wrote:
Craig,
Leave question marks in the corresponding fields. Hopefully somebody
will fill them up later.
Max
Craig Puetz wrote:
I am using an ASUS K8V-X mb and have working sound
On a board with two sata raid cards, I get a truncated dmesg.
I believe this is due to the size of msgbuf -- how is this set?
Dave
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeremy Gray wrote:
I have a tyan s2880 motherboard with dual broadcom NICs on it.
When I upgraded to the latest kernel,
(kernel-image-2.6.11-9-amd64-k8-smp) I lost the NIC because I guess
tg3 support wasn't included.
Does it work yet? Is there somewhere to track this so we know when it
will
James Titcumb wrote:
I would ask on the nVidia Linux Forum
http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?s=forumid=14
They don't seem to be very responsive, unlike here :)
That said, if you're trying to troubleshoot, why not use the nv
driver? It's
excellent for 2D work.
I would use nv
James Titcumb wrote:
Hello all,
I've managed to set up nvidia drivers before on this amd64 machine,
but since I've upgraded to my new kernel 2.6.11 with realtime-lsm,
nvidia module doesn't want to work.
Says something about interupt requests in the below listed
XFree86.0.log, and I'm not too
Lennart Sorensen wrote:
My problem is when I install the nvidia-glx driver (and hence
nvidia-kernel-source) and compiler it, X seems to start, but simply
turns off the monitor (bad signal sent to screen so it turns off).
Switching to the text console works fine. I can start and stop X just
fine,
Paul Reilly wrote:
Is anyone using debian 64 on a Tyan Tiger K8S (S2850G2NR) ?
Are there any issues with running debian on this board?
Looking at the specs it appears everything should be ok
but I'd like to hear first hand from anyone who uses it.
I'm just about to buy one of these with an Opteron
Zafod Biblbrox wrote:
| Hi all,
|
| I'm trying to do a net boot on a nforce3 chipset (uses sata_nv module)
with
| Seagate 160GB SATA drive, but the drive is not recognized:
Yesterday I used the debian installer on a gigabit board that also has
the nforce3 chipset,
and sata_nv wasn't available on
of the kernel. These appear to be nVidia's SATA RAID chips,
part of the nforce3 250 chipset; Debian-Installer didn't find them but I
imagine adding the SATA_NV driver will solve this problem.
Sorry to waste your time; I'll let the D-I people know.
Dave
David Liontooth wrote:
On a Gigabyte K8NS
The system is running fine.
Using the latest debian sarge netinstall I encountered two problems:
1. SATA_NV (of the nforce3 250 chipset) was not detected, the driver
not loaded, and the drives on it not detected. SATA_SIL saved the
day until I discovered what had happened.
2. nforcedeth loaded and
to be pretty
negligable right now. ~5Gb/day is probably close.
David
--
David J. Coulson
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: http://www.davidcoulson.net/
phone: (216) 920-3100 / (216) 258-4942
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
The Gigabyte K8NS Ultra-939 has the following hardware, for the
mainboard list:
https://alioth.debian.org/docman/view.php/30192/27/mainboards.html
ATA: NFORCE3-250
ATA RAID: GigaRAID ATA 133 RAID
Serial ATA: sil 3512 (sata_sil) and nforce3 250 (sata_nv)
Network: Marvell Yukon 88E8001 (sk98lin)
Doubletwist wrote:
Corey Hickey wrote:
|
|
| Were you using pure64 or gcc-3.4? I was using gcc-3.4 and I had pretty
| much the same problem. Here's how it went. Most of this happened
yesterday.
|
No, I'm using pure64. But I just ran an update and was able to install
enigmail, so I guess the change
On a Gigabyte K8NS mobo, I have three Seagate 200GB SATA
drives on a Silicon Image 3512 SATA Controller. One of them
works great. From dmesg it looks like the other two don't get
detected. This is on kernel.org's 2.6.12-rc1 amd64 -- I get the
same results on Debian's 2.6.8-10-amd64-k8.
libata
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
In my experience installing nvidia drivers is done the same way on x86
and amd64 using nvidia-kernel-source package. No difference I can tell
at least.
Am I the only one, or does the module-assistant break with the newest
nvidia drivers in the
Javier Kohen wrote:
From all the data you provided I conclude that the problem lies in the
video driver. I also estimate the likeness of my conclusion being wrong
to be very high.
I'm afraid that we are not magicians, we just try to help each other
when we can. Have you tried a 32-bit system? Does
Wesley J Landaker wrote:
On Saturday, 26 March 2005 11:28, David Liontooth wrote:
I agree, this sounds a lot like a video driver problem. I
don't even think the likelihood of this being wrong is
particularly high g
Well, I thought the same thing, but I was mostly just trying to figure
out
Wesley J Landaker wrote:
On Saturday, 19 March 2005 15:25, Wesley J Landaker wrote:
Hi folks,
On my amd64 machine, I'm having issues where for certain
applications, fonts and/or pixmaps will randomly disappear.
Has anyone heard of this before?
I guess I am the only one seeing this
dr.bob wrote:
ok, all this, while quite interesting, is not really helpful towards the problem
at hand. So let me rephrase the question: is there a way that works, to do
a netinstall on a server box that has only BCM5700 NICs? Ubuntulinux
perhaps? I happen not to have another Xeon box handy to
Pete wrote:
Hi all,
I've finally got vmware gsx 3.1 installed and running except for one
issue which I can't seem to find a result on with a Google search.
When running vmware-console, it works and logs in to the localhost
fine, but when I go to set a new virtual machine up, the pull down
Hi Chris,
To try to isolate the problem (I have no clue and others may have better
suggestions), I would start just X, without running a desktop manager.
Just type X at the command prompt -- that is to say, don't run gdm at
boot, or kill it and log in without running X-windows, then type X.
I had been looking for a while for an FTP GUI that handles AUTH-TLS
without much luck -- KBear doesn't (and nobody is working on it), and
while GFTP supposedly does, the Debian version doesn't and I wasn't able
to build it.
Kasablanca (http://kasablanca.berlios.de/download.html) builds without
Max wrote:
dchroot: Child exited non-zero.
dchroot: Operation failed.
What could be wrong?
It looks like a hospital invervention went horribly wrong, and I can
only hope the child will recover from this.
During surgery, the child for some reason was too excited, the doctor's
knife may have
T.J. Zeeman wrote:
Hi,
This morning I tried to do an apt-get update and got several errors on
package files from Alioth:
If you need a mirror:
http://mirror.ohiolinux.net/pub/mirror/debian-alioth/
David
--
David J. Coulson
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: http://www.davidcoulson.net/
phone: (216
daniele ge wrote:
hello,sorry for my orrible english
i am returned to debian after 2 year that i used gentoo
i found debian now very very good, i have installed it on my laptop and
all things is good, but i have a little problem on my desktop that for
me is impossible to solve, it is a week that i
Joshua Moore wrote:
FYI, I've heard several people have been having trouble getting the
onboard ethernet on the Abit AV8 board to work. I just tried the new
Hoary version of Ubuntu for AMD64. It appears that it detects the
onboard ethernet. As for the speed, I don't know much about how to
http://mirror.ohiolinux.net/pub/mirrors/alioth-amd64/
I'm syncing against alioth every 6hrs at the moment. Anyone using the
old debian-amd64 URL will still work, but it links into the alioth-amd64
pure64 directory.
Enjoy! :)
David
--
David J. Coulson
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: http
Hi Ozz,
Just a brief suggestion -- you do of course need to load the module first.
Adding it to /etc/modules just tells the OS to load it on boot -- it won't
load it while you're up and running just by listing it there.
modconf is one way to load modules, and the fact that you don't see it
in
Brian R. Whitecotton wrote:
David,
I have tried exactly what alsa.opensrc.org has suggested and still alsaconf
finds no pci sound devices. alsa-base and alsa-utils are installed,
modules.conf and modutils shows all pertinent entries, modinfo soundcore
shows soundcore is present and loadable
Dr Gavin Seddon wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to install a test ver of vmware. It complains my gcc ver
isnot the one that built the kernel. So I looked on faq and found I
need the any-any patch. I downloaded it but it won' install. Has
anyone installed vmware that can help?
Thanks
gs.
If you use
Brian,
This all looks like build and installation issues not specific to
amd64, and very much alsa-specific. For what it's worth, here's
my experience with an earlier version of the 1.0.8 source:
mkdir alsa cd alsa
cvs -d ':pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/alsa' login
cvs -z3 -d
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 11:47:31AM -, Simon Marlow wrote:
$ cat bug.c
register void * R1 __asm__(%r13);
extern void g(void);
static void f(void) {
R1 = g;
goto *R1;
}
$ gcc -S -O bug.c
$
And take a look at the generated assembly for the function f:
f:
.LFB2:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 04:59:38PM -, Simon Marlow wrote:
The mystery as to why this doesn't affect us on x86 is solved: on x86 we
generate slightly different C code, including a dummy function call:
extern void g(void);
static void f(void) {
R1 = g;
dummy();
goto *R1;
}
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 07:01:16PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Also, it should be a movq $g, %rax instead of movl.
The default x86_64 model on gcc is -mcmodel=small, which assumes that all
symbols are within the first 2GB. If you compile it with -mcmodel=medium
it'll generate:
movabsq $g,
in the log file /var/log/XFree86.0.log.
Please report problems to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Make sure you have loaded the nvidia kernel module by hand (i.e. #
modprobe nvidia, or put it in /etc/modules), it won't load automatically.
Greetings, David
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Brian R. Whitecotton wrote:
Hi All,
I have one more hardware issue that I am hoping someone can help me with.
arch 2.6.8-10-amd64-k8
soundcard soundblaster audigyls
alsa is installed but does not recognize the card (no PCI cards found)
101 - 200 of 268 matches
Mail list logo
