jmt wrote:
Sorry for the disturbion but I would like to mention some things.
I have been thinking about if it was possible to set up some bug list as a
kind of quality assurance for commercial programs in Debian. Most
commercial programs I have seen are only said to be compatible with RedHat
Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
Hi again
Thank you Goswin and Alexander for nice ideas. I will do something into
these directions.
About the idea below. Debian and more or less Linux has now been banned
from my institution even if I have been able to solve a lot of peoples
problems with it.
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 00:17, Sam Varghese wrote:
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 06:19:44PM +0200 Francesco Pietra said:
On Monday 08 May 2006 18:34, A J Stiles wrote:
On Monday 08 May 2006 15:46, Francesco Pietra wrote:
However, there is scientific proprietary software from small
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 08:17:59AM +1000, Sam Varghese wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Do you really believe that a business is set up for any other purpose
than to make money?
Some are. Some are not. Making money is a constraint -- the business
that does not make
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 15:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 08:17:59AM +1000, Sam Varghese wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Do you really believe that a business is set up for any other purpose
than to make money?
Some are. Some are not. Making
On Friday 05 May 2006 06:53, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
Hi
Sorry for the disturbion but I would like to mention some things.
I have been thinking about if it was possible to set up some bug list as a
kind of quality assurance for commercial programs in Debian. Most
commercial programs I
Message-
From: A J Stiles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 1:17 AM
To: debian-amd64@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Commercial programs in Debian
On Friday 05 May 2006 06:53, Gudjon I. Gudjonsson wrote:
Hi
Sorry for the disturbion but I would like to mention some things
On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 09:16:33AM +0100, A J Stiles wrote:
This is a most un-Debian-like thing to be doing. Instead of running non-Free
software on Debian, we should be seeking to create real Free alternatives
I would sure like to see a FOSS tool with the power of Gamess or Gaussian, or
On Monday, 08.05.2006 at 03:27 -0500, Miller, Marc wrote:
The Debian way is to promote the availability of source code, but is
that more important than worldwide adoption in general? The focus
should be on capturing the audience first, and converting commercial
ISVs to the open source model
Hi again
Thank you Goswin and Alexander for nice ideas. I will do something into
these directions.
About the idea below. Debian and more or less Linux has now been banned
from my institution even if I have been able to solve a lot of peoples
problems with it.
Looking at a guy copying
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yes, I agree with RMS on this point. He has pointed out that using the
GPL (an not a license that permits a comercial entity to abscond with
the code) superior free (yes, in both senses) _software_ (o/s,
utilities, applications) makes for a better
Hi,
I'm agree with wour point of view. There is a lot of developpement to do on
free software. but remember licences are for close market and to have captive
user due to the data format, driver, no interoperative system
this is the goal for commercial.
Remember free will never tell that
On Monday 08 May 2006 17:19, A J Stiles wrote:
The problem is, purchasing decisions are being made by people unqualified
to make those decisions.
That's true. In my country the public administration - including the
university - is wasting public money (derived from taxation) in software that
On Monday 08 May 2006 15:46, Francesco Pietra wrote:
However, there is scientific proprietary software from small softwarehouses
that has decades of experience and development, is sold with accompanying
source code, and solves problems that debian is quite far from solving.
Again, don't ask me
On Monday 08 May 2006 18:34, A J Stiles wrote:
On Monday 08 May 2006 15:46, Francesco Pietra wrote:
However, there is scientific proprietary software from small
softwarehouses that has decades of experience and development, is sold
with accompanying source code, and solves problems that
Þann Föstudagur 5. maí 2006 08:32 skrifaði jmt:
Sorry for the disturbion but I would like to mention some things.
I have been thinking about if it was possible to set up some bug list as
a kind of quality assurance for commercial programs in Debian. Most
commercial programs I have seen
. maí 2006 08:32 skrifaði jmt:
Sorry for the disturbion but I would like to mention some things.
I have been thinking about if it was possible to set up some bug list
as a kind of quality assurance for commercial programs in Debian. Most
commercial programs I have seen are only said
things.
I have been thinking about if it was possible to set up some bug list
as a kind of quality assurance for commercial programs in Debian.
Most commercial programs I have seen are only said to be compatible
with RedHat and sometimes SuSe.
Mind that most commercial programs
to setup some documentation about how good different
commercial programs integrate with debian on:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-doc/
Since you are dealing with scientific/engineering applications,
debian-science might als be appropriate:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-science/
Last but not least
Gudjon I. Gudjonsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi
Sorry for the disturbion but I would like to mention some things.
I have been thinking about if it was possible to set up some bug list as a
kind of quality assurance for commercial programs in Debian. Most commercial
programs I have
Sorry for the disturbion but I would like to mention some things.
I have been thinking about if it was possible to set up some bug list as a
kind of quality assurance for commercial programs in Debian. Most
commercial programs I have seen are only said to be compatible with RedHat
Hi
Sorry for the disturbion but I would like to mention some things.
I have been thinking about if it was possible to set up some bug list as a
kind of quality assurance for commercial programs in Debian. Most commercial
programs I have seen are only said to be compatible with RedHat
22 matches
Mail list logo
