Re: dpkg-architecture issues/vmware

2005-08-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 12:35:07AM +0100, Simon Guerrero wrote: Hi Around the same time, I noticed something odd about dpkg. dpkg-architecture (at version 1.13.1.11 of dpkg) gives: Where did you get that version of dpkg? In sarge it's 1.10.28 in sid it's 1.13.11 and in etch is should be

Re: dpkg-architecture issues/vmware

2005-08-26 Thread simon
I did have 1.10.28 from sarge, but I upgraded gcc to build a package earlier. I will change the link to point to the right one. I got dpkg from amd64.debian.net unstable, I think. But I may be wrong. Thanks for your help. Also - forgive the newbie question - but can someone tell me how to

Re: dpkg-architecture issues/vmware

2005-08-26 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 03:41:50AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I did have 1.10.28 from sarge, but I upgraded gcc to build a package earlier. I will change the link to point to the right one. I got dpkg from amd64.debian.net unstable, I think. But I may be wrong. Downgrading dpkg will

dpkg-architecture issues/vmware

2005-08-25 Thread Simon Guerrero
Hi I've managed to get nvidia drivers and madwifi working on my amd64 box, but something's gone wrong while I've been installing vmware 30-day demo. I can't get the bridged networking to work, and I've tried a couple of the vmware-any-any patches. Around the same time, I noticed something

Re: dpkg-architecture issues/vmware

2005-08-25 Thread Jamie Jones
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 00:35 +0100, Simon Guerrero wrote: Hi I've managed to get nvidia drivers and madwifi working on my amd64 box, but something's gone wrong while I've been installing vmware 30-day demo. I installed vmware 5 in ubuntu hoary amd64 (yes, it's not sarge, but it is amd64),