Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Maybe one issue: I now get LANG=nl_NL in /etc/environment; I think this used
to be [EMAIL PROTECTED]; was that changed ??
The way the locale is built. It is now language_COUNTRY, built from
the languagechooser choices.
Formerly, in all in one
Quoting Franz Amador ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I dunno. I had, at various times, installed two
versions of Mandrake and one of Red Hat, and none of
them moved my XP partition. It's been a while, but I
believe I initially partitioned the drive with Win98
in primary partition 1, WinXP in primary
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 07:43:36AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
The image is available from: (ETA 45m)
http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/install-images/sid-amd64-cdrom.iso
286a2279babf50bd09bf6427248e2efa 102871040 sid-amd64-cdrom.iso
This host seems to be unresponsive. Maybe its
Quoting Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I'm sorry but I can reproduce this bug with the last daily built CD
image (13-Jun-2004).
daily is not the same as sid_d-i ...
I think we have some terminology problem around here...and probably
some explanations are needed.
It took me time for
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
tags 250530 + l10n
thanks
I think the basic problem has been fixed now, but I still see some encoding
problems in the full country list in countrychooser (after choosing 'other'):
- most continents and countries are shown correctly
- two continents
Quoting Thorsten Schaefer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: base-config
Version: 2.23
Debian version: Debian Installer (testcandidate 1, also various daily builds
of beta 4 versions)
Hmm. I don't really see what's meant by various daily builds of
beta4. Beta4 is now over and not rebuilt.
Still
20040614 sid_d-i i386 netinst
1st stage is OK (choose french+Brazil)
After reboot, it seems that termwrap fails:
/bin/sh: line1: /dev/vc/1: No such file or directory
And then init respawns base-config over and over
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 06:37:39AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
My current understanding is:
-sid_d-i is built daily from the d-i packages uploaded to
unstable. Non d-i packages are also the unstable versions
-sarge_d-i is built daily (?) from the packages in testing (sarge)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 250530 -1
Bug#250530: nl_NL install: accented characters not shown correctly
Bug 250530 cloned as bug 254505.
reassign -1 iso-codes
Bug#254505: nl_NL install: accented characters not shown correctly
Bug reassigned from package `countrychooser'
clone 250530 -1
reassign -1 iso-codes
retitle -1 Reunion has wrong encoding in dutch translation
reassign 250530 countrychooser
retitle 250530 Wrong encoding for dutch translation
tags -1 pending
tags 250530 pending
thanks
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
tags 250530 + l10n
thanks
I
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
It looks like we have to throw out tc1 as not good enough for release.
The release critical problems include:
It seems to me that a kind of formal meeting on IRC would help all
of us in organising our work.
We maybe lack that kind of formal stuff (just an
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 01:14:49PM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
Reset (zap) the PRAM. Turn the power off, then turn it on with the
Command-Option-P-R keys (all of them) held down. Hold the keys
down til it bongs a couple of times, then release and it should
boot normally from floppy.
Rick
In http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004/06/msg01180.html Baptiste
Carvello wrote:
/etc/network/interfaces is empty
The same problem was reported in #243543 but was reported to have been
fixed already. Please check there to see if you think that the
circumstances are the same.
--
Thomas Hood
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version: 15-06-2004 02:30
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/tc1/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux sarge 2.4.26-1-386
Date: 15-06-2004 03:00.00
Method: Network install from ftp.nl.debian.org
Machine:
Your message dated Tue, 15 Jun 2004 14:27:01 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#254555: installation-reports
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hi,
At 15 Jun 04 07:31:49 GMT,
Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
It seems to me that a kind of formal meeting on IRC would help all
of us in organising our work.
We maybe lack that kind of formal stuff (just an idea en l'air).
As Joey leaves on Thursday, I'd
Christian Perrier wrote:
20040614 sid_d-i i386 netinst
1st stage is OK (choose french+Brazil)
After reboot, it seems that termwrap fails:
/bin/sh: line1: /dev/vc/1: No such file or directory
And then init respawns base-config over and over
I broke this in my changes to
Bastian Blank wrote:
Modified:
trunk/packages/libdebian-installer/src/system/devfs.c
Log:
Joey Hess likes to cry about wasted space but do it also.
A better way to save space with libdi is to move functions like this one
that are only used by one program in all of d-i out of the library
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
/bin/sh: line1: /dev/vc/1: No such file or directory
And then init respawns base-config over and over
I broke this in my changes to mapdevfs, uploading a fix now.
Which should make it in today's build, fine. Thus I'll be able to test
the 2nd
Christian Perrier wrote:
My current understanding is:
-sid_d-i is built daily from the d-i packages uploaded to
unstable. Non d-i packages are also the unstable versions
No, udebs are from unstable, but debs are from testing.
-sarge_d-i is built daily (?) from the packages in testing
Christian Perrier wrote:
It seems to me that a kind of formal meeting on IRC would help all
of us in organising our work.
We maybe lack that kind of formal stuff (just an idea en l'air).
I hope if it's a formal meeting that there are some known topics for us
to discuss. This could be a good
Your message dated Tue, 15 Jun 2004 20:13:35 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line PCMCIA freezes install
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Baptiste Carvello wrote:
tc1: A few changes, but only to make it worse: after choosing none of
the above, I get a proposition to provide a driver floppy, and when I
anser no, I get cycled back to the previous question. The only way to
get to the menu is pressing the ESC key.
Please file a
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I hope if it's a formal meeting that there are some known topics for us
to discuss. This could be a good idea, at least it can't hurt to try it.
Basically, I think your dropping tc1 mail could be a start. Just get
all the points one by one and assign
Apal wrote:
:00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM USB (Hub #1) (rev 01)
:00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM USB (Hub #2) (rev 01)
:00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM USB (Hub #3) (rev 01)
:00:1d.0 Class 0c03: 8086:2482 (rev 01)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
tags 254448 d-i
Bug#254448: Debian Installer on IBM ThinkPad X23
There were no tags set.
Tags added: d-i
reassign 254448 discover1-data
Bug#254448: Debian Installer on IBM ThinkPad
- Forwarded message from Apal [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Apal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 20:05:01 +0200
To: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#254448: Debian Installer on IBM ThinkPad X23
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207)
Joey Hess a écrit :
libdebian-installer_0.29_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libdebian-installer_0.29.dsc
libdebian-installer_0.29.tar.gz
libdebian-installer4_0.29_i386.deb
libdebian-installer4-dev_0.29_i386.deb
libdebian-installer4-udeb_0.29_i386.udeb
libdebian-installer_0.26.1.really.0.22_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libdebian-installer_0.26.1.really.0.22.dsc
libdebian-installer_0.26.1.really.0.22.tar.gz
libdebian-installer4_0.26.1.really.0.22_i386.deb
Accepted:
libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.29_i386.udeb
to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.29_i386.udeb
libdebian-installer-extra4_0.29_i386.deb
to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4_0.29_i386.deb
Accepted:
libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.26.1.really.0.22_i386.udeb
to
pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.26.1.really.0.22_i386.udeb
libdebian-installer-extra4_0.26.1.really.0.22_i386.deb
to
Hmm. I don't really see what's meant by various daily builds of
beta4. Beta4 is now over and not rebuilt.
Still we have these imprecisions around all build versions.
Sorry for not being exact enough, i meant beta 4 of the debian
installer and various daily builds that came afterwards.
Joey Hess a crit:
Apal wrote:
:00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM USB (Hub #1) (rev 01)
:00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM USB (Hub #2) (rev 01)
:00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801CA/CAM USB (Hub #3) (rev 01)
:00:1d.0 Class 0c03:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 08:40:06PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I hope if it's a formal meeting that there are some known topics for us
to discuss. This could be a good idea, at least it can't hurt to try it.
Basically, I think your dropping tc1
Oh? So you didn't have the DHCP problem when you used tc1?
No, it worked just fine now.
Seems I said to early that it is working fine now. With the daily
build from June 14th that I downloaded and tested today, the issue is
there again (for the REM56G-100). I checked syslog and the same
Il Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 08:40:06PM +0200, Christian Perrier ha scritto:
[...]
I currently propose Saturday June 19th, 16:00 UTC as a first
possibility. #debian-boot channel, of course.
Folks, please confirm wheher you can attend this meeting.
(Joey already counted as not attending)
1)
Alessandro Polverini wrote:
reading the changelog of d-i I saw you switched back to the old logo
because the current one confused some users (!?).
It's hard to belive, isn't it? It seems that more than one user saw the
white lines dividing the top and bottom of the logo, and the cut in half
Hi again,
After Joey Hess ask me to load the usb-uhci module, i tried to detect
the usb cdrom drive again, and it works !
Perhaps the installator should try to load these 3 modules before
detecting cd :)
Thanks for your support !
I will send an installation reports again after this try. Bye !
I tried again :
Only the normal install (kernel 2.4) is able to load the usb-uhci
module, to detect my drive.
The linux26 install can't load this module. My drive is not recognized.
Is it possible to fix the linux26 install ?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 08:40:06PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
I currently propose Saturday June 19th, 16:00 UTC as a first
possibility. #debian-boot channel, of course.
Folks, please confirm wheher you can attend this meeting.
(Joey already counted as not attending)
I can't make
Your message dated Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:02:05 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#253361: fixed in netcfg 0.69
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:02:05 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#253099: fixed in netcfg 0.69
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Hi Folks,
I'm new to Debian.
Just tried the sarge netinst.iso and am unable to get DHCP working during
install. I skipped the network setup and installed the base system. I
suppose I can try to setup DHCP again. I know my Internet is correct as I
have had SuSE detect it and XP.
.
(my system
Your message dated Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:02:05 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#248147: fixed in netcfg 0.69
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:02:05 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#247734: fixed in netcfg 0.69
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:02:05 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#253086: fixed in netcfg 0.69
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
netcfg_0.69_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
netcfg_0.69.dsc
netcfg_0.69.tar.gz
netcfg_0.69_i386.udeb
netcfg-dhcp_0.69_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_0.69_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Accepted:
netcfg-dhcp_0.69_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-dhcp_0.69_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_0.69_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_0.69_i386.udeb
netcfg_0.69.dsc
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.69.dsc
netcfg_0.69.tar.gz
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.69.tar.gz
* Ganesh Sittampalam [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-14 17:34]:
At one point the installer mentioned PCMCIA (I think in the context of
removing PCMCIA support, but I forget). At no point did it mention that
you are unlikely to need it if you don't have a laptop (or that you are
very likely to if
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 254411 -1 -2
Bug#254411: (no subject)
Bug 254411 cloned as bugs 254629-254630.
reassign -1 lvmcfg
Bug#254629: (no subject)
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `lvmcfg'.
reassign -2 lvmcfg
Bug#254630: (no subject)
Bug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 254411 newt
Bug#254411: (no subject)
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `newt'.
retitle 254411 Passwords don't result in * or so echoed
Bug#254411: (no subject)
Changed Bug title.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please
reassign 254411 newt
retitle 254411 Passwords don't result in * or so echoed
thanks
* Ganesh Sittampalam [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-14 17:34]:
When entering passwords to set up accounts, you don't get *s as you
type. This is actually fairly standard for Linux, of course, but
users tend to
clone 254411 -1 -2
reassign -1 lvmcfg
reassign -2 lvmcfg
retitle -1 doesn't tell how to switch to the third console
retitle -2 doesn't give good error when bogus LV name is used
severity -1 minor
severity -2 minor
thanks
* Ganesh Sittampalam [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-06-14 17:34]:
Something
Hi,
I also have interest to participate on meeting (specially about the install manual
translation topic). I agreed
with being on Saturday - 19 June - if possible (for most people is the best time to
participate, because is a
non work hour).
Folks, please confirm wheher you can attend this
Package: debian-installer
Version: http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/2004-06-14/floppy/
After booting and displaying the low memory warning, d-i loops
forever displaying the following two lines:
Unknown localized field:
Description-C.UTF-8:
I used the boot.img and root.img floppy
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: sarge beta4
uname -a: Linux pluto 2.4.26-1-386 #2 Sat May 1 16:31:24 EST 2004 i486 GNU/Linux
Date: 14 Jun 2004 20:00
Method: floppy boot (boot.img, root.img, cd-drivers.img, net-drivers.img)
then network install from
Tried a woody install tiny iso and DHCP setup worked.
Hi Folks,
I'm new to Debian.
Just tried the sarge netinst.iso and am unable to get DHCP working during
install. I skipped the network setup and installed the base system. I
suppose I can try to setup DHCP again. I know my Internet is
v2.0
1.,
2.
3.(,)
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
:http://www.3d173.com/swim/
mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel:0415-6988442
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Apal wrote:
I tried again :
Only the normal install (kernel 2.4) is able to load the usb-uhci
module, to detect my drive.
The linux26 install can't load this module. My drive is not recognized.
Is it possible to fix the linux26 install ?
The module for the 2.6 kernel is called uhci-hcd. Of
Matt Kraai wrote:
Package: debian-installer
Version: http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/2004-06-14/floppy/
After booting and displaying the low memory warning, d-i loops
forever displaying the following two lines:
Unknown localized field:
Description-C.UTF-8:
I used the
usb-discover_0.17_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
usb-discover_0.17.dsc
usb-discover_0.17.tar.gz
usb-discover_0.17_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Accepted:
usb-discover_0.17.dsc
to pool/main/u/usb-discover/usb-discover_0.17.dsc
usb-discover_0.17.tar.gz
to pool/main/u/usb-discover/usb-discover_0.17.tar.gz
usb-discover_0.17_all.udeb
to pool/main/u/usb-discover/usb-discover_0.17_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for
usb-discover_0.17_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
usb-discover_0.17.dsc
usb-discover_0.17.tar.gz
usb-discover_0.17_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Rejected: usb-discover_0.17_i386.changes: a file with this name already exists in the
Accepted directory.
Rejected: usb-discover_0.17.dsc file already exists in the Accepted directory.
Rejected: usb-discover_0.17_all.udeb file already exists in the Accepted directory.
Rejected:
Hi all,
The mailing list web page says i should introduce myself. So here goes:
Name: Paul Gear
Age:32 (and feeling every minute of it)
Location:
Brisbane, Australia
Why i am here:
Trying to convert from Red Hat/Fedora to sarge
Using Linux since:
kernel 0.97
netcfg_0.70_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
netcfg_0.70.dsc
netcfg_0.70.tar.gz
netcfg_0.70_i386.udeb
netcfg-dhcp_0.70_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_0.70_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Accepted:
netcfg-dhcp_0.70_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-dhcp_0.70_i386.udeb
netcfg-static_0.70_i386.udeb
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_0.70_i386.udeb
netcfg_0.70.dsc
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.70.dsc
netcfg_0.70.tar.gz
to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_0.70.tar.gz
67 matches
Mail list logo
