Bug#280558: Package: installation-reports

Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ uname -a: Linux nsmse68 2.6.8-1-386 #1 Tue Nov 8 22:45:28 CET 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date: originally 8. Nov Method: CD Boot (USB)

Bug#280020: sata on a dell poweredge 1800 not detected

On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 02:30:30PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: On Sun, 07 Nov 2004, Geert Stappers wrote: On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 07:21:01PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: snip/ Comments/Problems: Installer didn't recognize the SATA controller. append

d-i over ISDN line?

Hi, just a curious question: Can I use d-i (e.g. the netinst CD) with PPP over ISDN? Not that I really want to go through the pain of a 64 (or 56) kbit/s line, I just like to know :-) TIA! Cheers, WB -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Bug#280181: marked as done (netcfg-dhcp: Proceed without prompting in case of failure)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Nov 2004 11:32:19 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#280181: netcfg-dhcp: Proceed without prompting in case of failure has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#278116: Seems to be a bug with libparted

On Sun, Oct 31, 2004 at 10:25:56AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And this is the correct partition table With parted however, I got this: Disk geometry for /dev/hda: 0.000-9787.148 megabytes Disk label type: loop MinorStart End Filesystem Flags 1 0.000

Bug#279017: partconf: Does not change partition type

On Sun, Oct 31, 2004 at 08:54:34PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: There may be something else that contributes to this. If I change the type of an existing ext3 partition to 0xc, partman will still show this partition as EXT3. So it seems that partman does not look at the partition type, but at

local base-installer is ignored

Hi, inorder to workaround bug #254996 I've prepared a custom base-installer with a slightly modified postinst script. The custom version of package resides in the local component of the repository on the CD-ROM, that means it's Package entry is in:

Bug#280598: installation-report (failed)

Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: debian.org, test version i386 of 08 Nov 2004 Date: 09 nov 2004 Team Debian, Attempts to install i386/20041108/sarge-i386-netinst on a new Dell Dimension 8400 3.0GHz P4 with 4GB RAM and two SATA drives failed with a no partitionable media

Bug#280558: marked as done (Package: installation-reports)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Nov 2004 13:47:54 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#280558: Package: installation-reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is

Bug#280612: installation-reports

Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: Fill in date and from where you got the image uname -a: Linux valhalla 2.6.8-1-686 #1 Thu Oct 7 03:15:25 EDT 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date: 10 November, 2004 Method: i386-business card, expert26 mode, network installation

Bug#280614:

Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/i386/pre-rc2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso uname -a: The result of running uname -a on a shell prompt Date: Linux Method: from CD-ROM? Machine: Compaq Armada 1750 Laptop Processor: Pentium II

Bug#280612: installation-reports

I forgot to say i used the pre-rc2 businesscard of 09/30/2004. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#280627: Package: installation-reports

Package: installation-reports to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian-installer-version: sarge-i386-netinst.iso from 9-nov-2004 uname -a: Linux (none) 2.6.8-1-386 Date: 9-nov-2004 Method: Preseed file w/ network install in QEMU virtual machine. Machine: VM Processor: VM Memory: Root Device: VM Root

linux-kernel-di-hppa-2.6_0.3_hppa.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-5-32-di_0.3_hppa.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-hppa-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-5-32-di_0.3_hppa.udeb cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-5-64-di_0.3_hppa.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-hppa-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-5-64-di_0.3_hppa.udeb

Bug#280633: INSTALL REPORT

Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: Debian Sarge 3.1 Preview Release 2004 from Lehmanns uname -a: Linux racksrv09 2.6.8 #1 Sat Nov 6 15:22:37 UTC 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date: Sat Nov 6 14:00:00 UTC 2004 Method: Used Sarge CD to boot, partition drives and install

Processing of kbd-chooser_1.07_powerpc.changes

kbd-chooser_1.07_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: kbd-chooser_1.07.dsc kbd-chooser_1.07.tar.gz kbd-chooser_1.07_powerpc.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe.

kbd-chooser_1.07_powerpc.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: kbd-chooser_1.07.dsc to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_1.07.dsc kbd-chooser_1.07.tar.gz to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_1.07.tar.gz kbd-chooser_1.07_powerpc.udeb to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_1.07_powerpc.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for

Re: local base-installer is ignored

Free Ekanayaka wrote: How do you fix this? AFAIK anna does not look in local, only main. Though the changelog for version 0.008 makes me wonder if it did before. This would probably need to be fixed in both anna and the retreivers and the retreiver protocol, though it might be possible to just

Re: d-i over ISDN line?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: just a curious question: Can I use d-i (e.g. the netinst CD) with PPP over ISDN? Not that I really want to go through the pain of No. -- ciao, Marco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of kbd-chooser_1.08_i386.changes

kbd-chooser_1.08_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: kbd-chooser_1.08.dsc kbd-chooser_1.08.tar.gz kbd-chooser_1.08_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe.

kbd-chooser_1.08_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: kbd-chooser_1.08.dsc to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_1.08.dsc kbd-chooser_1.08.tar.gz to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_1.08.tar.gz kbd-chooser_1.08_i386.udeb to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_1.08_i386.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your

Bug#280627: Package: installation-reports

Kees van den Broek wrote: * I'd like to define the language in the preseed file, not manually and also not on the boot prompt. So would we all. Bug #276001 is the best approach at it I've seen, but will only work if the installation media is changed to include a preseed file, not for network

Bug#280633: INSTALL REPORT

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Debian-installer-version: Debian Sarge 3.1 Preview Release 2004 from Lehmanns I'm sorry, from where? What version? Is Lehmanns some store, or is he your next door neighbor? Booting was OK, selection of language should be different. Why can't I just say LC_ALL=C ?

Bug#280612: installation-reports

Stephan wrote: Debian-installer-version: Fill in date and from where you got the image *ahem* The above is not part of the installation report just to look pretty. We need the version of the installer you used to do anything with your installation report. During the installation process i had

enviar

quiero que me mandes el delay hack ami correo que es [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#270674: discover1: Deletes /media/cdrom0

Package: discover1 Version:1.7.3 Severity: important The symlinks are still not being created for me even with this new version (1.7.3). I did a apt-get update then apt-get remove --purge discover1 and then re installed it with apt-get install discover1. Then I ran dpkg-reconfigure to

Bug#252000: problem unchanged w/newest d-i

Just responding to the request for further info... I did try the latest release of sarge netinst in October, 2004 on an IBM NetVista exactly like the one described in the original bug report. I got exactly the same results: The PC boots off the CD, but when the install process gets to the point

Re: Old world mac boot floppies

Thanks again for the help. I'm up and running. The CMOS battery fixed my boot problems, and I did have to use the quik quirk settings for my powerpc 6400 (load-base=10, output-device=ttya). I also was also able to boot the 2.4 debian installer floppies from daily builds. It's been an

Processing of netcfg_1.07_i386.changes

netcfg_1.07_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: netcfg_1.07.dsc netcfg_1.07.tar.gz netcfg_1.07_i386.udeb netcfg-dhcp_1.07_i386.udeb netcfg-static_1.07_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Re: Old world mac boot floppies

On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 01:35:04PM -0700, Wade Berrier wrote: Thanks again for the help. I'm up and running. The CMOS battery fixed my boot problems, and I did have to use the quik quirk settings for my powerpc 6400 (load-base=10, output-device=ttya). I also was also able to boot the

Bug#275920: marked as done (debian-installer: wireless lan (wlan) settings are discarded at first boot)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Nov 2004 16:47:06 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#270304: fixed in netcfg 1.07 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

netcfg_1.07_i386.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: netcfg-dhcp_1.07_i386.udeb to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-dhcp_1.07_i386.udeb netcfg-static_1.07_i386.udeb to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_1.07_i386.udeb netcfg_1.07.dsc to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_1.07.dsc netcfg_1.07.tar.gz to pool/main/n/netcfg/netcfg_1.07.tar.gz

Bug#280185: marked as done (installation-reports: [i386] [20041105] d-i ignores encryption keys of wireless network interfaces.)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Nov 2004 16:47:06 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#270304: fixed in netcfg 1.07 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

Bug#270304: marked as done (netcfg: netcfg/wireless_wep template contains falsehood)

Your message dated Wed, 10 Nov 2004 16:47:06 -0500 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#270304: fixed in netcfg 1.07 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your

free miboot on OldWorld Mac

On Aug 11, 2004, at 3:44 PM, Sven Luther wrote: On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 03:12:49PM -0400, Rick_Thomas wrote: Here are a few practical suggestions: Has anyone looked at inside Macintosh or some of the other early Mac technical docs? I wonder if this code is, maybe, described there? The real

Bug#280612: installation-reports

* Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [101104, 13:31]: *ahem* The above is not part of the installation report just to look pretty. We need the version of the installer you used to do anything with your installation report. yes i know, i used the pre-rc2 businesscard Could you dump the actual

Re: Old world mac boot floppies

On Nov 10, 2004, at 5:25 PM, Sven Luther wrote: On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 01:35:04PM -0700, Wade Berrier wrote: I did have one idea: if you can boot a coff image from an hfs partition, couldn't you have an hfs /boot partition on the harddrive and boot directly from open firmware? If I understand

Bug#280020: sata on a dell poweredge 1800 not detected

On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 11:58:07AM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 02:30:30PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: On Sun, 07 Nov 2004, Geert Stappers wrote: On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 07:21:01PM +0100, Peter Palfrader wrote: snip/ Comments/Problems: Installer

Processing of linux-kernel-di-hppa-2.6_0.4_hppa.changes

linux-kernel-di-hppa-2.6_0.4_hppa.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-kernel-di-hppa-2.6_0.4.dsc linux-kernel-di-hppa-2.6_0.4.tar.gz kernel-image-2.6.8-1-32-di_0.4_hppa.udeb nic-modules-2.6.8-1-32-di_0.4_hppa.udeb ppp-modules-2.6.8-1-32-di_0.4_hppa.udeb

linux-kernel-di-hppa-2.6_0.4_hppa.changes is NEW

(new) cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-1-32-di_0.4_hppa.udeb standard debian-installer CDROM support This package contains core CDROM support for the Linux kernel. (new) cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-1-64-di_0.4_hppa.udeb standard debian-installer CDROM support This package contains core CDROM support for

Processing of rootskel_1.08_hppa.changes

rootskel_1.08_hppa.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: rootskel_1.08.dsc rootskel_1.08.tar.gz rootskel_1.08_hppa.udeb rootskel-bootfloppy_1.08_hppa.udeb rootskel-locale_1.08_hppa.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#279213: marked as done (No 2nd stage after installation with netinst CD using network-console)

Your message dated Thu, 11 Nov 2004 00:40:06 +0100 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line #279213: No 2nd stage after installation with netinst CD using network-console has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

rootskel_1.08_hppa.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: rootskel-bootfloppy_1.08_hppa.udeb to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-bootfloppy_1.08_hppa.udeb rootskel-locale_1.08_hppa.udeb to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-locale_1.08_hppa.udeb rootskel_1.08.dsc to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.08.dsc rootskel_1.08.tar.gz to

linux-kernel-di-hppa-2.6_0.4_hppa.changes ACCEPTED

Accepted: cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-1-32-di_0.4_hppa.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-hppa-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-1-32-di_0.4_hppa.udeb cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-1-64-di_0.4_hppa.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-hppa-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.8-1-64-di_0.4_hppa.udeb

Re: d-i over ISDN line?

On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:24:50 +0100, W. Borgert wrote: just a curious question: Can I use d-i (e.g. the netinst CD) with PPP over ISDN? Not that I really want to go through the pain of a 64 (or 56) kbit/s line, I just like to know :-) TIA! No, I don't think so. And it's also a bit late in the

Bug#270674: discover1: Deletes /media/cdrom0

On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 02:16:15PM -0500, Ralph Crongeyer wrote: No CD/DVD drives found. Could you send full output of 'discover -d all' on both kernels? I'm tired of seeing this bug so I'm teetering between removing the feature versus coming up with a fix. How do you actually use the

partman-auto limitations on sparc

On sparc, partman-auto can only partition existing free space, it's not capable of repartitioning a whole disk. Indeed, it does not even present that as an option, and if it's preseeded to partition a whole disk anyway, we see why: /bin/perform_recipe: IN: NEW_PARTITION

Re: local base-installer is ignored

|--== Joey Hess writes: How do you fix this? JH AFAIK anna does not look in local, only main. Though the changelog for JH version 0.008 makes me wonder if it did before. This would probably need JH to be fixed in both anna and the retreivers and the retreiver protocol, JH though it

Re: local base-installer is ignored

[Joey Hess] AFAIK anna does not look in local, only main. Though the changelog for version 0.008 makes me wonder if it did before. Anna used to fetch udeb sfrom the 'local' component. Debian Edu used it to fetch all special udebs before we managed to get them into the Debian archive

Bug#280703: Package: installation-reports

Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: Minimal-Network-Install-CD from Debian.org http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sid_d-i/i386/pre-rc2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso uname -a: Linux dell 2.6.8-1-686 #1 Thu Oct 7 03:15:25 EDT 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date: see