> It would be better if you are given svn access.
I granted Cajus commit access.
This was the 139th entry in the commiters list.
Joey, I suggest we do some "cleaning" next year. There are certainly
people in this list who do not contribute anymore to d-i.
We have always had a very opened way o
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 287047 lvm2
Bug#287047: debian-installer: LVM, hangs while populating /dev if no disk in
the 2nd CDROM drive
Bug reassigned from package `lvmcfg' to `lvm2'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian
Christian Perrier wrote:
> I think we should correct this bug with the provided patch. I've
> testing it numerous times on my automated testing box and it is indeed
> the only way to safely preseed tasks when using non English languages.
>
> I still need a small "ok" from Joey for commiting the ch
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> reassign 287030 kernel
Bug#287030: [powerpc][rc2] Fails to boot newer Apple G5 PowerMac
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `kernel'.
> reassign 286761 kernel
Bug#28
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> reassign 285870 kernel-image-2.6.8-1-386
Bug#285870: F/U Bug#285859: Installation-Report on Dual P4 - kernel panic
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to
`kernel-image-
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> reassign 285890 grub-installer
Bug#285890: 'IR: Dell Precision 370'
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `grub-installer'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Dennis Stampfer wrote:
> on Saturday (build 20041018), I tried to load a preseed.cfg from floppy
> with d-i sarge netinstall:
>
> "linux preseed/file=/floppy/preseed.cfg"
Do you mean booting from a netinst CD, or was this netboot. At the
moment booting from floppy, CD, or USB stick supports loa
On Fri, Dec 24, 2004 at 12:52:16AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 09:04:27AM +0100, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
> > Just looked at the new version. It has changed in base-installer 1.14.
> > Ignore me ;-)
>
> It's moved to a different file (kernel/powerpc.sh), but the code is
> st
Dick Visser wrote:
> While working on a custom sarge installer, I realized that it would be
> much easier to have some possibility to add my custom module during the
> install process.
>
> I know that woody had this feature (driver disk), but I cannot seem to
> find it anymore in sarge?
Pretty mu
Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> It would be wonderful if you can make partman-prep to work both on ppc
> and hppa. The partman-palo package does not have testers and if there
> are only string differences between partman-palo and partman-prep then
> it is better to maintain only one package.
Actually I a
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Can you please move colo-installer/1.1 (udeb+source) to testing.
> Unlike the current version in testing, this version generates a config
> file for colo which is compatible with future versions of colo, and
> it's more reliable. (It also works with the colo currently in
Can you please move colo-installer/1.1 (udeb+source) to testing.
Unlike the current version in testing, this version generates a config
file for colo which is compatible with future versions of colo, and
it's more reliable. (It also works with the colo currently in
testing.)
--
Martin Michlmayr
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 09:04:27AM +0100, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 23. Dezember 2004 07:23 schrieb Sven Luther:
> > Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
> > > While looking for the way to set the correct subarch, I found that in
> > > base-installer's postinst, line 438 the CPU variable is filled
On Dec 23, 2004 at 06:34:55PM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> > > Current entity New entity Definition
> > > - --- manual "Debian Installer Manual"
> > How will it be used? You can forget 'Just look this up in &manual;' as
> > this is untranslatable to languages, in wh
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 287047 lvmcfg
Bug#287047: debian-installer: LVM, hangs while populating /dev if no disk in
the 2nd CDROM drive
Bug reassigned from package `lvm2' to `lvmcfg'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debi
reassign 287047 lvm2
thanks
Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote:
> I've tested the netinst image got on 20041220 for i386 and installed a lvm
> based
> system.
So the install worked, but the system failed or was slow to boot because
of this problem. So it seems to be a bug in the lvm tools, not the
in
Your message dated Fri, 24 Dec 2004 00:11:58 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#286901: Solved: Disks where broken
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> reassign 286897 discover1-data
Bug#286897: ISDN hardware detection
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `discover1-data'.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Ple
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> reassign 286901 grub-installer
Bug#286901: debian-installer: install-grub fails with RAID1
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `grub-installer'.
>
End of message, stoppi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 287047 lvm2
Bug#287047: debian-installer: LVM, hangs while populating /dev if no disk in
the 2nd CDROM drive
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `lvm2'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistanc
Your message dated Thu, 23 Dec 2004 17:58:28 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen t
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> severity 287019 important
Bug#287019: debian-installer: loads megaraid instead of megaraid2
Severity set to `important'.
> tags 287019 d-i
Bug#287019: debian-installer: loads megaraid
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> reassign 258500 kernel
Bug#258500: Installer fails to recognise SiI3112 hw RAID array
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `kernel'.
>
End of message, stopping processing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.8.5
> reassign 286939 kernel
Bug#286939: Medley driver claims "No usable RAID sets found", which is wrong!
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `kernel'.
>
End of message, stop
Your message dated Thu, 23 Dec 2004 17:42:23 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#287021: debian-installer: Full build (d-i+udebs) fails
using checkout of RC2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dea
I don't think that you can get preseeding to do all the steps needed to
set up lvm. You might take a look at the partman-auto-lvm udeb in svn,
it's not yet been uploaded to the archive though.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Daniel Dickinson wrote:
> This failed with a fatal error saying that there were modules in more
> than one udeb. On this list I was told that this was a kernel version
> problem that was fixed, but if the rc2 tag is to mean getting a working
> d-i rc2 then the packages need to match what was us
Hi Eric,
I've been looking at the partman logs attached to the other bugs merged
with this one and could not notice any similarities. Could you please
submit a clean partman log? Just boot the installer, start partman, go all
the way to the main partitioning screen (which displays the whole disk
First of all, thanks for the message.
> Just one thing, the version of parted in sarge is 1.6.11 + some
> backported
> patches, and the version in experimental is 1.6.20, so in no way is the
> version in knoppix newer than the debian version, unless there is a
> mistake
> here somewhere.
Secondl
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal
Hi,
I've tested the netinst image got on 20041220 for i386 and installed a lvm based
system.
I've 2 CDROM drives: /dev/hdc which is a burner with the D-I CD mounted in and
/dev/hdd which is a CDROM reader.
If there is no disk in /dev/hdd then the insta
severity 289986 wishlist
retitle 289986 Please provide separate tasks for different desktop environments
thanks
There are numerous reasons for which the desktop task installs both
environments. Joey Hess would explain them far better than me, but I'm
pretty sure that this will certainly not change
Quoting Helge Kreutzmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> severity 286986 wishlist
> thanks
>
> Please read
> http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities
I should have read further...:-)
Anyway, this bug will be wishlist twice...:-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
I'll be away for a few days with no net access. The few of you who
will be around, please take a good care of this nice installer...:-)
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Quoting Anton Zinoviev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 04:51:10PM +0100, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
> >
> > The partman-prep thingie is running here. Maybe someone with svn access
> > can put it in?
>
> It would be better if you are given svn access.
Just give an alioth account and y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Dickinson wrote:
|>> from d-i-rc2
|>>
|>> ./scripts/buildscript
|>
|> This is only a convenience script for developers. It puts the generated
|> udebs in installer/build/localudebs/, where they should _not_ go for
|> a production build. The produ
I’m trying to do a netinstall with current Debian (Sarge)
on my new Dell SC420 server. Here’s my drive config:
2 SATA 10k RPM WD Raptor 36gig drives connected to onboard
raid configd as raid 1.
Promise S150 SX4-M Raid 5 controller
3 SATA WD 200gig drives configd as a raid 5.
I’m load
Package: cdebconf
Severity: normal
Version: 0.73, 0.72
If I run anna or main-menu from d-i console 2, they segfault. It used to
be possible to speak debconf protocol to them raw, so this segfault is
annoying. The crash happens because deconfclient_new does this:
client->out = fdopen(3, "a
Package: installation-reports
Severity: important
Debian-installer-version: RC2 Netinst, also 20041219 Business Card ISO
uname -a:
Date: Dec 20, 2004
Method: Tried CD and hard disk boot
Machine: Apple Dual 2.0 Ghz G5 Power Mac
Processor: Dual PowerPC G5 2.0 Ghz
Memory: 512 MB
Root Device:
Root
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 06:22:16PM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> reassign 286534 partman
> severity 286534 critical
> retitle 286534 [MERGED] Finds no partition table on disk with unaligned
> partitions
> merge 242114 286534
> thanks
>
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 10:25:50AM -0500, Eric Carlsen wro
Ok, all I can say is "sorry":
I did not expect that the 2 new disks where broken.
The one more, the other less.
Now, with another new disk in debian installer did create the RAID1,
intsll grub and since then tries to recover the other disk
Sorry again, and pls close the bug report.
Thanks
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
severity 287021 wishlist
thanks
Daniel F. Dickinson wrote:
Package: debian-installer
Severity: serious
Justification: 4 (Autobuilding)
Rationale: rc2 is an official release candidate of the debian-installer,
therefore checking out rc2 should successfully autobuild d-i rc2,
in
severity 287021 wishlist
thanks
Daniel F. Dickinson wrote:
> Package: debian-installer
> Severity: serious
> Justification: 4 (Autobuilding)
>
> Rationale: rc2 is an official release candidate of the debian-installer,
> therefore checking out rc2 should successfully autobuild d-i rc2,
> includi
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 287021 wishlist
Bug#287021: debian-installer: Full build (d-i+udebs) fails using checkout of RC2
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrato
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geert Stappers) writes:
> On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 09:55:01PM +0100, Felix Natter wrote:
>
>> This is the output of lspci:
>
>> :00:0e.0 Network controller: AVM Audiovisuelles MKTG & Computer System
>> GmbH A1 ISDN [Fritz] (rev 02)
>
> And what is the output of
>
>
Package: debian-installer
Severity: serious
Justification: 4 (Autobuilding)
Rationale: rc2 is an official release candidate of the debian-installer,
therefore checking out rc2 should successfully autobuild d-i rc2,
including required udebs (since d-i without appropriate udebs is
useless). This
Package: debian-installer
Version: N/A; reported 2004-12-23
Severity: normal
This is on a dell poweredge 2850
No problem installing with megaraid, but that leaves no traces of the
raid under /proc/megaraid
adding megaraid2 to /etc/mkinitrd/modules, and recreating initrd.img
fixes the problem. May
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 11:14:42AM -0500, Jurij Smakov wrote:
>
> This does not make any sense to me. For one thing, silo-installer runs
> after the base install.
I mean that silo-installer can contain your finish.d hooks. Ofcourse
they will be run by partman before the base install. In silo-in
Hi,
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
reassign 286265 silo-installer
thanks
Silo-installer already includes finish.d hooks so it is better for this
patch to be applied there and not in partman-target.
This does not make any sense to me. For one thing, silo-installer runs
after the base in
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> forwarded 286534 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#286534: [MERGED] Finds no partition table on disk with unaligned partitions
Noted your statement that Bug has been forwarded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> merge 242114 286534
Bug#242114: [MERGED] Finds no partition tabl
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 04:51:10PM +0100, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
>
> The partman-prep thingie is running here. Maybe someone with svn access
> can put it in?
It would be better if you are given svn access.
> But wait - I may have a real hppa machine for testing. Just asking...
Good but not nece
Am Donnerstag, 23. Dezember 2004 17:38 schrieb Anton Zinoviev:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 07:15:37PM +0100, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
> > I've prepared a partman-prep package which should add support for PPC
> > PReP boot partitions to the installer. The package has been forked from
> > partman-palo.
>
On (23/12/04 16:51), Lechevalier Olivier wrote:
> Package: installation-reports
>
> Debian-installer-version: sarge
> http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/rc2/sarge-i
> 386-netinst.iso
> uname -a: Linux nagios 2.4.27-1-386 #1 Fri Sep 3 06:24:46 UTC 2004 i686
> GNU/Linux
> D
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: sarge
http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/i386/rc2/sarge-i
386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux nagios 2.4.27-1-386 #1 Fri Sep 3 06:24:46 UTC 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: 22/12/2004
Method: net-inst http proxy
Machine: Ibm Xseri
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 10:49:26AM +0100, jens persson wrote:
>
> 1 1 10 lvm method{ format } .
>
> This works as far as the partition map have the correct sizes but the
> lvm partition gets the wrong type (ext[23]). It also gives a warning
> about that the last partition isn't format
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 286534 partman
Bug#286534: [D-I RC2 i386] Installer fails to read partition table
Bug reassigned from package `libparted1.6-0' to `partman'.
> severity 286534 critical
Bug#286534: [D-I RC2 i386] Installer fails to read partition table
Severity
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 07:15:37PM +0100, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
>
> I've prepared a partman-prep package which should add support for PPC PReP
> boot partitions to the installer. The package has been forked from
> partman-palo.
It would be wonderful if you can make partman-prep to work both on
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 02:02:15AM +0100, Nikolai Prokoschenko wrote:
> On Dec 20, 2004 at 10:08:20PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
>
> > Current entity New entity Definition
>
> > - --- manual "Debian Installer Manual"
>
> How will it be used? You can forget 'Just look
severity 286986 wishlist
thanks
Please read
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities
While it may not be nice, a simple confusion does not violate Debian
policy. Please include the relevant clause if you report serious bugs.
Greetings
Helge
--
Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> severity 286986 wishlist
Bug#286986: Calling GNOME and KDE "Default Desktop" is confusing
Severity set to `wishlist'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator
reassign 286265 silo-installer
thanks
Silo-installer already includes finish.d hooks so it is better for this
patch to be applied there and not in partman-target.
Anton Zinoviev
> On Saturday 18 December 2004 23:35, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> >
> > I've cooked up a little patch, implementing a finish
On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 02:14:47PM -0800, John Reiser wrote:
>
> The name of the first IDE interface (the one for hda and hdb)
> is "ide0". I'm willing to overlook capitalization, but the
> digit '0' is important.
The name is ide0 in the context of the /proc directory of Linux.
However in the n
reassign partman-auto
thanks
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 02:14:09PM -0800, Paul Telford wrote:
>
> After reading over all the documentation and examples I can find and
> running numerous test installs, it does not seem to be possible to
> create an expert-recipe for use in a preseed file which only p
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 08:13:46AM -0500, John Koskie wrote:
> Try the net install disk...I have a 2.0 GHz dual G5 desk top and it
> works on that. I used "expert-power4". However, my machine is a few
> months old, and you may have a newer cpu. As evidence, I tried the
> install disk on a new imac
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> reassign 286265 silo-installer
Bug#286265: Partman hook for various checks on sparc
Bug reassigned from package `partman-target' to `silo-installer'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking sys
|--==> Andreas Kuckartz writes:
AK> I tested the installation process an an Acer laptop using a CDROM
containing
AK> DeMuDi 1.2.1-rc1. I select the German language.
AK> A few observations:
AK> 1. My PCMCIA network device is not installed. I have seen a message that
module
AK> pcmcia_
Package: tasksel
Version: 2.18
Severity: serious
debian does NOT have a default desktop. i can't find the written
details for it though.
however there is:
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-desktop/
i would prefer separate entries:
gnome
kde
gnustep
since all of the gui toolkits have rather differe
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 09:43:09AM +0100, Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 23. Dezember 2004 07:23 schrieben Sie:
>
> [...]
>
> > In any case partman-prep should be installed on all of the IBM machines :
> > all prep (even ppcbug i think), IBM chrps and the newer pseries and what
> > not.
Accepted:
localechooser_0.03.dsc
to pool/main/l/localechooser/localechooser_0.03.dsc
localechooser_0.03.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/localechooser/localechooser_0.03.tar.gz
localechooser_0.03_all.udeb
to pool/main/l/localechooser/localechooser_0.03_all.udeb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.
Your message dated Thu, 23 Dec 2004 04:32:22 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#286848: fixed in localechooser 0.03
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Il giorno mer, 22-12-2004 alle 20:13 +0100, Frans Pop ha scritto:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wednesday 22 December 2004 11:02, Stefano Canepa wrote:
> > yesterday I installed my Sony Vaio PCG-FX801 stage 1 finished
> > correctly but I had two little problem in instal
localechooser_0.03_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
localechooser_0.03.dsc
localechooser_0.03.tar.gz
localechooser_0.03_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
On Thu, 2004-12-23 at 03:40, Adrian Chow wrote:
> I have the same problem with the newly bought Proliant.
>
> Any help I can give?
>
> adrian
Just install lilo, there are a lot of workarounds mentioned
on the lists and wiki, all for different kind of bugs and I
got none of them working, and beli
Your message dated Thu, 23 Dec 2004 08:47:33 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#286832: Sparc: missing characters
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now y
tags 286848 pending
thanks
Quoting Kurt Roeckx ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Package: localechooser
> Version: 0.02
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> The package is failing to build in a clean chroot because of
> missing build dependencies. It's missing atleast locales and
> iso-codes. With those 2 ex
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> tags 286848 pending
Bug#286848: localechooser: FTBFS: missing build dependencies
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(admin
75 matches
Mail list logo
